The Fulcrum

Friday, September 24, 2004

T.S.A. - Totally Screwed-up Agency 

I just found this via Wayward Winds - maybe most of you have seen this already - and it's very disturbing:

For the past month, Kathryn Harrington has stared down the possibility of a criminal trial, a $10,000 fine and the stigma of being deemed a security risk at Tampa International Airport.

The reason? She had a bookmark with her as she passed through airport security screening.
It was one of those leather bookmarks that is weighted on each end to help hold open a paperback book while you read it. Ms. Harrington had apparently carried it through several airports' security screenings and had never had a problem with it. But in Tampa, FL she was arrested and taken away in hand-cuffs.

That these small minded bureaucrats arrested this woman - rather than tell her she couldn't take it on board - is bad enough. But the reason they could act this way is even more disturbing:

According to the TSA's official prohibited items list, anyone who brings any banned item to a screening checkpoint, even accidentally, may be criminally or civilly prosecuted. Even items that are not specifically listed, but could be considered dangerous, are illegal.
So if you make a mistake and bring something you shouldn't they don't just take it from you and offer to mail it back anymore? They can arrest you? And even if you read up on the list - is it posted on-line somewhere? - and you bring something that's not on the list but that some bozo rent-a-cop with a new badge thinks might be dangerous, they can still arrest you?

WTF?


Jeff Danziger 

If you haven't seen his cartoon today on Slate or in your local paper, go now.

Here.


More Draft Hints? 

On the front page of the Army Times' web site today is this headline:

Myers: Call-ups expected after election


That particular story is blocked except to subscribers, but it lends further credence that the military manning levels are currently inadequate for the current OPTEMPO. The Guard is nearly tapped out and will likely be unable to meet their recruiting goals. The Reserve and Ready Reserve have already had multiple, targeted call-ups. So where do the services get the people they need?

And notice, because Army Times is not "mainstream," perhaps Gen. Myers didn't feel the need to filter out that part about not doing it until "after [the] election."

Anyone out there with a subscription to Army Times want to let us know what this article has to say?


BushCo. Hints at Draft? 

Somewhere this morning I read that the National Guard, for the first time since 1994, will miss its recruiting goals by around 5,000. At the same time we see the following in the WSJ:

Pentagon plans call for a temporary increase in U.S. troop levels in Iraq early next year that would coincide with elections there in January and could be used to bolster the newly elected Iraqi government.

The personnel surge, part of a long-planned force rotation, will occur from January to April as new units rotate into the country and those finishing their tours prepare to return home. An Army official said as many as three additional Army brigades -- about 15,000 troops -- could be in Iraq around the time of the elections and thereafter. Plans call for the U.S. to return to the current level of 138,000 troops by the end of April.
Three brigades basically comprise the majority of a Division and the Army just doesn't have Divisions it can toss around like a spare chess piece. And you can't just add 15,000 troops to a combat area and expect the current logistical and personnel system to keep working - they need more of those folks, too.

So, while having all these soldiers in Iraq at the same time will be "relatively easy," because they just hold up part of a rotation of troops home, what happens to those soldiers when they rejoin their units in the States or in Europe? Will they come right back to Iraq when their units come back in a year or so? What about their time with family? What about their time to train and re-equip to be ready to go back into the meat grinder? What about resting?

No, there's only one way to keep troop levels high enough to keep up this OPTEMPO (Operational Tempo), and it's spelled D R A F T.


Unintentional Irony? 

On the front page of today's Wall Street Journal on-line:



That occasional "popping" sound you hear is a Republican's head finally exploding from the cognitive dissonance.


Thursday, September 23, 2004

Bush's Whole World Consists of Iraq 

How else to explain this:

Standing beside Iraq's interim leader, President Bush contended Thursday that insurgents could "plot and plan attacks elsewhere, in America and other free nations," if the United States pulled out.
There's nowhere else in the whole world for terrorists to "plot and plan?" Does he think that just because American HMMWVs are rolling through the Green Zone that al Zarqawi is huddled, shaking in some dank cellar in Najaf, afraid to "plot and plan?"


...And The Poor Get Poorer 

Republican should just make their party motto "Fuck the Poor."

Oh, wait... it already is.

Congressional negotiators beat back efforts yesterday to expand and preserve tax refunds for poor families, even as they added $13 billion in corporate tax breaks to a package of middle-class tax cuts that could come to a vote in the Senate today.
Thanks to BlondeSense for the heads-up on this.


Democracy on the March in Afghanistan, Too 

If you thought that our attempts at exporting democracy were a shambles only in Iraq, think again. Via AMERICAblog (are you reading them yet?) we find that the US is attempting to force candidates other than Hamid Karzai out of the race.

That's real democracy, no? From the LA Times:

Mohammed Mohaqiq says he was getting ready to make his run for the Afghan presidency when U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad dropped by his campaign office and proposed a deal.

Mohaqiq was still determined to run for president — though, he said, the U.S. ambassador wouldn't give up trying to elbow him out of the race.
"He left, and then called my most loyal men, and the most educated people in my party or campaign, to the presidential palace and told them to make me — or request me — to resign the nomination. And he told my men to ask me what I need in return."


Striking Matches in a Powderkeg 

BushCo. makes another attempt at sparking Armageddon and invoking the rapture. What else could explain this latest stupid, tone deaf move in the Middle East?

Iran has said it will react "most severely" to any Israeli action against its nuclear facilities, issuing the warning after Israel said the United States was selling it 500 bunker buster bombs.

Israeli military officials said Tuesday that the Jewish state will receive nearly 5,000 smart bombs, including the 500 one-ton bombs that can destroy two-yard-thick (two-meter-thick) concrete walls.


The Rich Get Richer... 

I've posted before about how BushCo.'s tax cuts have preferentially benefited the already well off - see here. Today's Wall Street Journal brings further proof that while the vast majority of Americans are still worried about keeping their jobs, their homes and maybe buying some back-to-school clothes, the rich have a different concern: what to do with that spare $100,000:

Luxury German car maker Porsche AG Wednesday said sales and earnings rose in fiscal 2004, as gains from the Cayenne sports utility vehicle more than offset heavy declines in the core 911 and Boxster sports cars.
It must be nice...


Financing Health Care 

Actually the story in today's Wall Street Journal made no mention of health care. But it was the first thing that came to mind when I read it.

Eighty-two of the country's largest profitable corporations paid no federal income tax for at least one year of the Bush administration's first three years, a study found.

The study by Citizens for Tax Justice, a liberal-leaning think tank in Washington, and the affiliated Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, examined 275 Fortune 500 corporations with total cumulative profits of $1.1 trillion in 2001, 2002 and 2003. One-third paid no federal income taxes in at least one of those years, and many received refunds of taxes paid in prior years.
It's easy to see why 1) the federal deficit is rising out of control and 2) the middle class is being squeezed for every penny. Also of interest, since I'm very aware of what tax bracket I pay in was this:

The think tank's 1988 survey of large corporations found the overall effective tax rate was 26.5%; a survey of companies in 1996-98 found the rate dropped to 21.7%. The latest survey showed the effective rate fell to 17.2% in 2001-03.
Talk about tax relief! I'd love to be in the 17% bracket!

Now just imagine that the IRS got serious about ensuring that corporations paid their taxes, about closing loop holes. Imagine that Congress had the gonadal fortitude to pass legislation ensuring they paid taxes on foreign profits. Imagine what could be done with that money. It wouldn't fund universal health care, but it would make a serious dent in the bill. It could provide room to give the poor and the middle class a serious respite from rising effective tax rates.

Imagine.

But don't hold your breath.


Wednesday, September 22, 2004

Democracy is on the March 

If this is democracy, it's no wonder BushCo. has no qualms about destroying our civil rights:

Clashes also erupted after sunset Wednesday in the central city of Samarra, where U.S. forces had earlier claimed success against militants waging a 17-month insurgency, police said.


A Request To My Readers 

I rarely ask anything of my few readers other than to leave a comment now and then, but I received a request to blog about something that intersects with several of my interests. I got an e-mail from International Planned Parenthood, an organization I make sure my United Way donations go to, about the unavailability of abortion for women in the armed services. Here's their pitch, and a link to a petition, I hope you'll consider signing it.

Did you know that the military won't cover the cost of abortion, even if the servicewoman has been raped? But the military does cover the cost of cosmetic surgery, including breast implants, nose jobs, and liposuction!

A ban on military abortions forces soldiers who become pregnant while serving overseas to seek abortions at private clinics and to pay for the procedure themselves, making it difficult and costly to end a pregnancy. Worse yet, the ban leaves women serving in countries where abortion is illegal - like Iraq and Afghanistan - nowhere to turn, effectively depriving them of freedom of choice.

Click here to sign a petition asking your members of Congress to lift the ban.
Thank you.


Distract, Dissemble, Deflect 

The three Ds of the Republican election playbook.

Well I'm not buying them. I haven't touched on the CBS-Memo thing and I wasn't going to. But I will make this one exception. Rude Pundit - he is rude, but he is smart - has only one post on the subject. Like myself, he wasn't going to bother; the whole thing's a distraction, a chance to dissemble or deflect the questions entirely. Go read his whole post, but let me quote this:

Bottom line on this sideshow: Would those who say that Dan Rather should not be trusted, now that he seems to have used forged memos in a portion of a single report, ever say the same thing about George Bush when he led us to war based on "misleading" information about WMDs, including, well, forged documents? Howzabout a trade? We won't trust Rather anymore if you don't trust Bush. Deal? No? Then go fuck yourself with your memos.
Damn straight.


An Invisible Minority 

I don't look like a "minority." In fact, other than being a very Anglo looking third generation Hispanic-American (I don't speak much Spanish, I have no accent, I'm not very dark skinned and I have green eyes), I look very much like a "white" male. This past weekend, however, I found out that I am, indeed, a true minority.

I live in the very small town of Marion, NY about 25 miles outside of Rochester. My wife and I found a wonderful home that sits on top of a ridge overlooking a beautiful valley full of trees, a small stream and lots of deer, foxes, woodchucks and hawks. It's a little bit of paradise that we retreat to at the end of a long day at work.

The "minority" part? Despite being in one of the "bluest" of states, I found out that I'm one of "maybe two" Democrats in the entire town. In fact, talking with a local Democratic Assemblyman, I found out that I'm one of very few Democrats in the whole county.

Damn. It's a good thing there are so many Democrats in New York City...


Petty, Vindictive Bastards 

Not content to merely trample protesters' First Amendment rights during the RNC, New York City law enforcement agencies, likely goaded on by Republican Mayor Bloomberg (whose strings were probably being pulled by the national Republican machinery) also felt it necessary to confiscate protesters' bicycles. Over 300 of them. Some of them were of innocent bystanders. Some of them were apparently legally chained up and not in use.

The matter of the seized bicycles has been a little-noticed footnote to the ongoing legal disputes over mass arrests during the demonstrations, with complaints that innocent people were swept up in them and many were detained for long periods in violation of court orders.

[snip]

To retrieve a bicycle, the owner must present the property voucher, given at the time of arrest, at the district attorney's office and obtain a release form to show to the property clerk in Brooklyn. Bicycles played a significant role during the Republicans' visit. On Aug. 27, the Friday before the convention, about 5,000 bicyclists shouting "No more Bush!" hurtled past Madison Square Garden. Later that night, more than 250 of them were arrested after a protest ride that ended in the East Village. Many of the arrests were made outside St. Mark's-in-the-Bowery Church on Second Avenue, and most were on charges of disorderly conduct or obstructing traffic. Many bicyclists said they were arrested even though they had broken no traffic laws.


The Day the Movies Changed 

Do you remember 1977?

For me, 1977 was the year that the movies changed. And today, I am reliving a small piece of that excitement.



The original Star Wars Trilogy will arrive on my doorstep today and I'll begin the journey back to when I was 16, waiting to see a new movie that was supposedly like nothing we'd ever seen before. And it was. And movies have never been the same. (Truthfully, neither have I!)


Tuesday, September 21, 2004

Bush Breaches Your Privacy 

If you flew on an American aircarrier in June of this year, you may want to call the airline:

The Transportation Security Administration proposed an order that would compel 77 airlines to provide names, addresses and other information collected through carriers' reservation systems for domestic travel during the month.

All passenger records will be compared with a newly concentrated security watch list, compiled by federal law enforcement, intelligence and security agencies.
This "security watch list" is probably the same one that caused the diversion of a flight today because Cat Stevens was on board.

I kid you not.


Bush Killed Jack Hensley 

Does Bush awake at night, the sweat dripping from his forehead, a scream dying in his throat, dreaming of the blood on his hands? Or does he sleep the sleep of the arrogant?

A posting on an Islamic Web site claimed Tuesday that an al-Qaida-linked group has slain a second American hostage in Iraq and threatened to kill a third hostage.

The claim that Jack Hensley, a civilian contractor, had been killed could not be verified immediately.


Bush is a Fabulist 

Fabulist. He lies, but he may (or may not) believe his own lies. So says Richard Cohen in today's Washington Post. And I agree:

Who'd like to be the last man to die for that? I'm looking for a show of hands. But more than that, I'm looking for someone to raise questions that go to the heart of this matter of life and death. In this sense, Iraq is fast becoming Vietnam -- only the stakes are higher. (Vietnam had no oil.) It is also Vietnam in the way the presidential campaign is handling it. Once again the GOP is playing the odious patriotism card to silence dissent. As for Bush, he talks about Iraq with the same loopy unreality as he does his National Guard service. He's a fabulist.
And in the same vein, Tony Auth's editorial cartoon in the Post puts it all into perspective. Fabulist, indeed.



Bush Still Lying About Iraq 

While this quote, from the New York Times, is from Condoleeza Rice, you can be sure that nothing passes her lips that hasn't been vetted by Bush and his brain, Karl Rove.

She [Rice] said ``there's no evidence'' that Iraq is falling into a state of civil war and said things are better than three months ago even though the Iraqi people ``are facing a very tough and daring insurgency.''
And the same can be said of Colin Powell (how low the once great general has fallen):

Secretary of State Colin Powell, interviewed Tuesday on ABC's ``Good Morning America,'' called the situation ``a difficult struggle'' but said ``to say we can't deal with it, this sort of attitude that we're on the verge of defeat is absolutely wrong.''
What f***ing universe are these two living in? Cause it's not the same universe where this is happening:

Deadline looms for American, British captives in Iraq
American contractor beheaded in Iraq
Iraq bombs cause civilian deaths
Iraq: busload of corpses discovered
Camp Pendleton Marine killed in Iraq
Ex-Michigan man killed by homemade explosive in Iraq
Senior Sunni clerics assassinated in Iraq
Had enough?


Bush Allows Iran to Build Nukes 

By bogging down the majority of our military power in Iraq (and to a much lesser extent Afghanistan), and linking so much of our policy in the remainder of the Middle East to Israel, Bush has ensured that we do not have the means to enforce demands that Iran discontinue its nuclear program.

Gholamreza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, told reporters in Vienna Iran had begun converting 37 tonnes of raw uranium into material which is fuel for nuclear centrifuges -- the machines that enrich uranium.

One nuclear expert has said that, if enriched, that would be enough material for five nuclear weapons.
Are you safer now than you were four years ago?


Bush Killed Eugene Armstrong 

Just as surely as if he'd grasped the knife in his own hands and sawed through Armstrong's neck; George W. Bush killed Eugene Armstrong.


Monday, September 20, 2004

Where Are All the Bill Moyers? 

Via Altercation, I found this wonderful speech given by Bill Moyers on the duties and the state of modern journalism.

Ed Wasserman, among others, has looked closely at the impact on journalism of this growing conglomeration of ownership. He recently wrote: "You would think that having a mightier media would strengthen their ability to assert their independence, to chart their own course, to behave in an adversarial way toward the state." Instead "they fold in a stiff breeze" - as Viacom, one of the richest media companies in the history of thought, did when it “couldn’t even go ahead and run a dim-witted movie” on Ronald Reagan because the current president’s political arm objected to anything that would interfere with the ludicrous drive to canonize Reagan and put him on Mount Rushmore. Wasserman acknowledges, as I do, that there is some world-class journalism being done all over the country today, but he went on to speak of "a palpable sense of decline, of rot, of a loss of spine, determination, gutlessness" that pervades our craft. Journalism and the news business, he concludes, aren’t playing well together. Media owners have businesses to run, and "these media-owning corporations have enormous interests of their own that impinge on an ever-widening swath of public policy" - hugely important things, ranging from campaign finance reform (who ends up with those millions of dollars spent on advertising?) to broadcast deregulation and antitrust policy, to virtually everything related to the Internet, intellectual property, globalization and free trade, even to minimum wage, affirmative action and environmental policy. "This doesn’t mean media shill mindlessly for their owners, any more than their reporters are stealth operatives for pet causes," but it does mean that in this era, when its broader and broader economic entanglements make media more dependent on state largesse, "the news business finds itself at war with journalism."
It's incredible. It's important.

Read it.

Now.


Quagmire Update 

Could this be the first shot in a Iraqi civil war?

Gunmen killed a Sunni Muslim cleric as he entered a mosque in Baghdad to perform noon prayers Monday, the second slaying of a cleric from the influential Association of Muslim Scholars in as many days, the group said.


No Blonde Jokes, Please 

If you haven't found BlondeSense yet, you're missing a true gem of the blogosphere. Three women with some serious political commentary, humor and snark, they also throw in a little feminist commentary, posts on everyday life and some damn fine Photoshop work.

BlondeSense, Patricia and Jaye will keep you informed, entertained and coming back. Go check them out. It's an every day read for me.


Louisiana Burnishes its Image 

Although you could hardly expect anything else, Louisiana voters overwhelmingly approved an amendment to their state constitution banning gay marriage.

With 95% of precincts reporting, the amendment won approval with 79% of the vote and support for it was evident statewide. Only in New Orleans, home to a politically strong gay community, did the race appear to be close, and even there the amendment was passing by a small margin.

"It's gratifying to see the people of Louisiana had an opportunity, as distinguished from judges, having the final say on the issue of whether traditional marriage will continue to be the fundamental institution in our state," said Darrell White, a retired state judge and consultant for Louisiana Family Forum, which pushed hard for the amendment.
Like most of these amendments, the gay community and civil rights activists will challenge the amendment on procedural and constitutional grounds. But the damage has been done; Louisiana has confirmed outsiders' impression of the state as backwards and bigoted.


The Shifting Sands 

It seems that BushCo. has decided that Iraq being the central front in the War on Terror is not working out so good. So, as they often have, they are working to lower expectations so that almost regardless of the outcome, they can tout it as a success. Witness this bit from this morning's Wall Street Journal (subscription):

President Bush is moving to control the Iraq debate with a weeklong effort that signals U.S. resolve to see through that country's chaotic experiment in democracy while tapping the power of incumbency for his re-election campaign.
Two things of note; 'experiment' connotes that the Iraqis are conducting this on their own. Seems to me that it's more our experiment in preemptive war. Also, 'chaotic experiment' makes it seem as though perhaps the Iraqis just aren't cleaning up after themselves in the lab.

Somehow chaotic experiment doesn't capture the horror and bloodshed of over a thousand dead American soldiers, thousands of injured soldiers, tens of thousands of dead Iraqis and a country that is slipping closer and closer to civil war. It's an experiment, alright. One that's in the process of blowing up in Bush's face.

But the effort continues of lowering expectations. One gets the feeling that by the time November 2 rolls around, if Iraq hasn't torn itself to pieces in civil war, Bush will consider it a "key victory in the War on Terror."


The End of the Weekend 

It was a beautiful, late summer weekend. The mornings were cool, the days were warm. And the evenings...



Stuff

Politics
Move On


Previous Posts

Google

Web The Fulcrum
Free Google Page Rank Checker

TTLB Ecosystem

Bloggers Parliament
Bloggers Parliament

Issues and Google Bombs
visit LIBERAL FORUM

Shopping

Directories

Site Stuff

Creative Commons License

The Fulcrum Archives

Refering Sites

Who Links to Me