The Fulcrum

Saturday, February 14, 2004

Is That Really All of Them? 

Via Dohiyi Mir and CNN:

Hundreds of pages of President Bush's Vietnam-era military files were released to the media Friday amid questions about whether he completed his required service in the Air National Guard.

About 400 pages of what officials have been able to find of his military records -- from 1968 to 1973 -- were released early in the evening.
The article never says, nor does anyone from the administration, that this comprises his entire military records jacket. CNN also says that the records are very repetitive; something that - at least in my case and other sets of military records I've seen - is not usually true.

Of course this was done at the nadir of the media coverage week; a Friday afternoon. And there has been no detailed analysis done yet. So it remains to be seen just how much this release explicates the questions that have been raised. We should, however, as NTodd says; give "credit, where credit is due."


Friday, February 13, 2004

No. 

The headline is to answer this question from my post below:

"Is there no limit to the depths this maladministration will stoop?"

Apparently, there is not.

A story in today's New York Times has Ashcroft defending his subpoena of women's medical records from several hospitals.

The department has subpoenaed at least six hospitals, in New York City, Philadelphia, Chicago and Ann Arbor, Mich., to obtain medical histories for women who have had abortions in the last three years performed by the doctors now suing the government. A federal judge in Chicago has thrown out a subpoena against Northwestern University Medical Center because he said it was a "significant intrusion" on patient privacy, and hospital administrators in other cities are contesting the demand as well.
There are obvious signs of retribution here; the records subpoenaed are only from those doctors suing the government. There are also signs that Ashcroft sees himself - and his band of merry men - as omniscient:

Mr. Ashcroft told reporters that "if the central issue in the case, an issue raised by those who brought the case, is medical necessity, we need to look at medical records to find out if indeed there was medical necessity." He refused to say whether he had personally signed off on the subpoenas for the records.
Is anyone in the Department of Justice qualified to determine what is medically necessary? And if there are questions, how will they resolve them? They can't maintain the women's privacy - as promised - and then subpoena them or their doctors to ask pointed questions about something that should be strictly between a person and their doctors. And of course, see the last sentence, Ashcroft won't even accept responsibility for his actions: "He refused to say whether he had personally signed off on the subpoenas for the records."

This is, on the face, a clear instance of intimidation; of the doctors, the medical facilities where they practice and the women involved. It is spiteful, hateful and intrusive. And it is entirely in character.

Women make up more than 50% of the citizens of the US. If a single woman votes for BushCo in November they are fools.


George W(ho)? 

Via Hesiod over at Counterspin Central, comes this story from the Memphis Flyer. Seems that two pilots from the Alabama Air National Guard unit that aWol supposedly served in while away from his Texas unit don't remember him.

This story confirms a lot of things I've been saying in comment threads on multiple blogs: pilots are a very small part of aviation units - numbers-wise. And they hang out together, drink together; there's a lot of truth behind the bar scenes in "Top Gun." None of these two pilots remembers anyone showing up from out of state. One of them remembers looking for him:

Recalls Memphian Mintz, now 63: “I remember that I heard someone was coming to drill with us from Texas. And it was implied that it was somebody with political influence. I was a young bachelor then. I was looking for somebody to prowl around with.” But, says Mintz, that “somebody” -- better known to the world now as the president of the United States -- never showed up at Dannelly in 1972. Nor in 1973, nor at any time that Mintz, a FedEx pilot now and an Eastern Airlines pilot then, when he was a reserve first lieutenant at Dannelly, can remember.

“And I was looking for him,” repeated Mintz, who said that he assumed that Bush “changed his mind and went somewhere else” to do his substitute drill. It was not “somewhere else,” however, but the 187th Air National Guard Tactical squadron at Dannelly to which the young Texas flyer had requested transfer from his regular Texas unit – the reason being Bush’s wish to work in Alabama on the ultimately unsuccessful U.S. Senate campaign of family friend Winton "Red" Blount.

Bold emphasis is mine.
He never showed up.


Friday Dog Blogging 

The long, cold winter we've had here in New York has been rough on all of us. It's been so cold for so long that I'm starting to wish that I could hibernate. During most of the year and in the winter when it's not so cold, Baylea gets to go out and play most afternoons when we get home from work. When it's in the single digits, even she doesn't enjoy being outside. And I can't really say I blame her.

While I can't hibernate, Baylea has no such compunction. So this Friday's dog blogging at the Fulcrum has Baylea doing one of the things she does best: sleeping!



Thursday, February 12, 2004

The Case of the Disappearing Dental Records 

Dental records?!? I swear I saw aWol's dental records from 1972 or 1973 on Good Morning America this morning. The White House claims that these prove Shrubby was at his Alabama Guard duties during a disputed period. If they are real, if they are his, what they prove is that he went to the dentist. That's all.

But the odd thing is, I've been around all the news sites, including ABC's, and there is no mention of the dental records.

Maybe it's too early for them to have updated their sites? But it was nearly an hour ago that I saw the preznit's teeth, full of the black marks and Xs indicating he has really bad teeth, by the way. So where is this story now? It's ridiculous. All the records that should be available - assuming the stories of record "cleansing" prior to aWol's Gubernatorial campaign are false - and the best they can do is a dental exam sheet?

They are in really big trouble on this one.

UPDATE: ABC has finally put the story up on their web site, but not on the front page. It's buried about 1/3 of the way down their Politics page. And the headline is that the dentist who apparently signed the form doesn't remember Bush. He also says that doesn't mean he wasn't there. Still to be cleared up is why Bush saw a dentist in Alabama when previous statements would have put him in Houston at the time.

The White House is starting to take a harder line; trying to repeat the mantra that what's been released should clear everything up. I still hold to my assertion: "They are in really big trouble on this one."


Wednesday, February 11, 2004

"A Texas C***sman" in Alabama 

Via Blah3, James Ridgeway at the Village Voice apparently found someone who would talk about Bush's time in Alabama when he was supposed to be working on a family friend's campaign and reporting to the Alabama Air National Guard. What this person has to say isn't very flattering:

In Alabama, where George W. Bush supposedly was slaving away on Winton "Red" Blount's 1972 U.S. Senate campaign in lieu of National Guard duty, he is remembered by a Blount son as a smartass "cuntsman" from Texas.
The other people who spoke apparently weren't any more impressed than Blount's son - except apparently a gaggle of southern belle debutantes also working on the campaign who thought Bush Jr. was "dreamy."

The article doesn't have much to say about whether or not Bush ever made it his drills on the weekends, just that he bragged about how much he'd drunk the nights before. But if they can find someone who remembers him at campaign headquarters, it shouldn't be that hard to find someone who remembers him on base.

Unless he was never there...



Ashcroft Seeking Release of Women's Medical Records 

Is there no limit to the depths this maladminstration will stoop?

Seems that John "The Crisco Kid" Ashcroft is seeking the release of medical records for patients, from several hospitals, of women who have or may have had a certain late-term abortion procedure. Fortunately a District Judge in Illinois has blocked the first request from a hospital in Chicago. But the Attorney General has made requests to several hospitals.

Read about this at Roger Ailes, who got it from TAPped.

This is a horrible intrusion into the most private of our records for likely the most heinous of reasons. Read it. Then, if medical privacy is at all important to you, do something about this. Write to your local paper - most especially if you are in or near Chicago. Write to your congressman. Talk to your doctor.


A Personal Exploration of Service 

Over at the Liberal Coalition, I've posted a rather longish, personal exploration of service and commitment and how that colors my opinions of Shrubby's A.W.O.L. conundrum. Here's an excerpt:

All this is to say that someone who goes through such training and who says that they "supported X war" that was happening when they became a pilot would not - under any circumstances - do anything to imperil their flight status and they would do anything they could to put their training to use in a war they believed in.

Does this sound like the current resident at 1600 Pennsylvania? He is on record as saying that he didn't want to "go to Canada or shoot out his eardrum with a shotgun," and yet he can still say with a straight face that he supported the Vietnam War.

Continue reading "Get Me a Flight Surgeon."
After reading the rest of my post, I hope you'll explore some of the other bloggers who are members of the Liberal Coalition: there are some wonderful writers in that blogroll.


Tuesday, February 10, 2004

Bush is Outsourced! [UPDATED] 

Via Hesiod from the Seattle Times, who seems to think Bush has finally stepped in it so badly that it's nearly unrecoverable for our Unelectable, Miserable Failure of a pRezint.

Seems that aWol, the compassionate conservative that he is believes that... well, check this out:

"The movement of American factory jobs and white-collar work to other countries is part of a positive transformation that will enrich the U.S. economy over time, even if it causes short-term pain and dislocation, the Bush administration said yesterday.

The embrace of foreign "outsourcing," an accelerating trend that has contributed to U.S. job losses in recent years and has become an issue in the 2004 elections, is contained in the president's annual report to Congress on the U.S. economy.

"Outsourcing is just a new way of doing international trade," said N. Gregory Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisors, which prepared the report. "More things are tradable than were tradable in the past. And that's a good thing."
Emphasis mine.
This from a politician and an economist for whom there is no chance of their jobs being "outsourced." And in fact, probably true for both of them, these are people who have never had to work hard a day in their lives to get to where they are. Theirs have been lives of privilege, of leisure, of unearned success.

Shorter BushCo to American workers: "F*** you! I got mine!"

UPDATE: I thought that regular reader Bob James' comments to this post were relevant, so I'd like to share part of them. I hope he doesn't mind.

It is so far removed from the realities of the situation that it's hard to formulate a response. And I'm so sick of hearing about how it's going to cause "short-term pain". What the hell do those pukes know about short-term pain? I'm hearing from colleagues who routinely add up the pros and cons of eating a bullet because they're stuck packing boxes for $6.50/hr instead of the $55K/year job they once held, and kissed goodbye to India. No one who's suffering this fate sees the pain as short-term, nor even as trivial as "pain". "Soul-killing anguish" barely covers it.
As I wrote above, these are people who don't know what it's like to live paycheck-to-paycheck; or at least what it means to have a budget that you have to stick to. Every problem they've had is trivial. Anyway, I thought Bob's remarks were important.


Monday, February 09, 2004

Media Decontaminated of Ricin 

If you read my previous post about the discovery of ricin in a capitol mail room, you'll know that I had a strange feeling about the whole incident. Well recent news has done nothing to relieve that odd feeling.

The major news outlets have been all but silent on the story; the odd circumstances under which the powder was found, the strangely subdued reactions by BushCo and most of all the oddly ineffective manner in which the toxin was delivered: to the only medical doctor in Congress.

In an article in The Hill ("The newspaper for and about the US Congress), the Capitol Police spokeswoman said the following:

Mail delivery to the Capitol complex is still suspended indefinitely, Capitol Police spokeswoman Contricia Sellers-Ford said yesterday.
But more interesting than that, Capitol Police haven't even decided what they are going to do to start investigating this.

Although police have confiscated all unopened mail from congressional offices, Sellers-Ford said the department still hasn't "pinpointed” its testing procedures or decided if mail will be returned.

The police notice said that mail removed during cleanup was “wrapped in protective packaging, catalogued and sealed inside protective containers and will be cleaned,” adding that “every effort is being made to safely return mail.”

Sellers-Ford said “nothing has tested positive.”
That odd feeling in the back of my mind is not going away.


New in the Blogroll 

Mac-a-ro-nies. I've read her blog before, and have been remiss in not getting her onto my blogroll; don't you be remiss in not reading some of the best written commentary on a small blog. My only complaint is that she has no commenting system set up. (The fact that she uses a Mac also prejudices me towards her!)

I highly recommend this post on "gay marriage." This is time well spent.

I know I don't always post about adding people to my blogroll. If you read my blog and think you fit in with the other folks there, leave me a comment or an e-mail. I'll be glad to add you in. If you're a regular reader and commenter, and you're not there, I promise it's only because of an unintentional oversight. Let me know.


Ipecac for the Mind 

I didn't want, to; but I made myself. I read the entire transcript of Preznit aWol's interview on Meet the Press. While I was reading, I kept wanting to skim over just about everything Bush said. Reading his remarks is nearly as bad as listening to them. Has there ever been a more illiterate sounding president?

Lots of folks have done a great job dissecting this whole thing, especially I have to recommend the folks over at Corente, and NTodd over at Dohiyi Mir. But go visit most any of your favorite bloggers - there is plenty of really great reaction and analysis out there.

I just want to list a few of my reactions:

1. I didn't bother to count, but there had to be a dozen references to 9/11 in various guises regardless of whether there was reason to link the topic being discussed with the terrorist attacks of 2001. This has been a staple in every public utterance by aWol.

2. I know I mentioned it in my remarks above, but reading his remarks is like reading the ramblings of a 10 year old. His noun-verb agreement problems make me cringe. His remarks bounce erratically from point to point and topic to topic all within what should be a short, easy answer.

3. Bush's verbal "placeholders" and acknowledgments of statements would have gotten me - and most likely him - slapped as a kid. They consisted of "Yeah" and "Uh-huh" and other figurative verbal tics that are impolite at best and uneducated at worst in "polite conversation." Coming from a supposedly well educated man occupying the most powerful seat in the world, they are atrocious. They are not the sign of a common man, aWol is anything but common in his patrician and very privileged rearing and education.

4. He outright lied in several places. This point is well covered in lots of analysis of the interview, and I won't lay out the specifics here, it's been done better on other blogs (see above).
That's more than enough. I could go on, but, really, what's the point. The interview is done, there are some rumblings on the Right that this was a disaster for aWol, but the press has not really shown an interest in holding Shrubby to the same standards as they've held other presidents and the current crop of Democratic candidates. So what's the point?

This is really starting to get me down.


What I Didn't' Miss This Weekend 

Another weekend is in the history books. Amazing how quickly they go by, isn't it?

It was a great weekend; some of which I blogged about: CATS downtown on Saturday and a wine tasting afternoon on Sunday. We didn't get any snow this weekend and we actually saw the sun both days - or at least that's what I think that bright ball in the sky was... it's been so long. I watched the Grammys last night. It was actually quite enjoyable, but then I'm a huge music fan and no matter how often I say that I'll just watch the red carpet show, I always get sucked in. And I always love it. Finally, a movie recommendation: for a night when you want a semi-light, funny, family kind of movie that's just odd enough to be different, I highly recommend "Secondhand Lions." Robert Duval, Michael Cain and Haley Joel Osment; all three are excellent. Rent it, you won't be disappointed.

So, I did miss a few things in the literal sense, but honestly, after paying such close attention to politics and news lately, I really didn't miss taking this past weekend completely off. I did read the papers, I can't help that - it's a very old habit. But I didn't watch aWol's interview, although I will read the transcripts today. I didn't watch any news shows, I did very little blog reading - sorry all of you.

Of course that's all to say that I have some catching up to do. I haven't done a Liberal Coalition blog about in a while, there are a couple of subjects I'd really like to write about and of course, there's this thing called "work."

So I guess I'd better get at it. It's a new week!


Sunday, February 08, 2004

Languid Sunday 

Sometimes, there's just nothing like a lazy Sunday to end the week - to end the weekend.

This morning we slept in a little late and didn't get out of bed until after 8:30. Then it was hot, light, homemade pancakes to start the day; lots of butter and real maple syrup. Well, real syrup for me, my wife doesn't like real maple so it's Mrs. Butterworth for her. Coffee, tea and, for me, a quick blog entry.

Then we're off to a nearby winery that's having a celebration of their ice wines. There will be sleigh rides through the vineyards, ice wine, chocolate, desserts of all kinds, live music and some friends. It should be a wonderful day. It could be warmer... right now it's only 21 degrees. But there's a light snow, a little sunshine and it should be absolutely beautiful. I think I'll be taking my camera - and if I get any good shots, I'll post a couple.

So, whatever it is that makes your Sunday relaxing and enjoyable and gets you recharged for another week, I hope you get it in spades today.

Sometimes, life is just perfect!


Stuff

Politics
Move On


Previous Posts

Google

Web The Fulcrum
Free Google Page Rank Checker

TTLB Ecosystem

Bloggers Parliament
Bloggers Parliament

Issues and Google Bombs
visit LIBERAL FORUM

Shopping

Directories

Site Stuff

Creative Commons License

The Fulcrum Archives

Refering Sites

Who Links to Me