The Fulcrum
Friday, July 16, 2004
And Now For Something Completely Different
Via Scooter comes The Cat With Hands.
A very distrubing movie that is very, very good.
A very distrubing movie that is very, very good.
BushCo. Transparency
You'll never see that headline anywhere; but I thought it might grab your attention.
It's the same sort of transparency we've seen in Cheney's energy commission and the Dynamic Duo's "meeting" with the 9/11 Commission. Their disdain for accountability and transparency seems to have no bounds:
It's the same sort of transparency we've seen in Cheney's energy commission and the Dynamic Duo's "meeting" with the 9/11 Commission. Their disdain for accountability and transparency seems to have no bounds:
The Bush administration is withholding information from U.N.-sanctioned auditors examining more than $1 billion in contracts awarded to Halliburton Co. and other companies in Iraq without competitive bidding, the head of the international auditing board said Thursday.I suppose this kind of reticence is not so surprising from BushCo., but the sheer scope of misdeeds uncovered boggle the mind.
The audit, which covers May 2003 to December 2003, asserts that the coalition's management of Iraq's oil was plagued by "inadequate" bookkeeping and accounting systems, high turnover among coalition finance officials and a disregard for procedures designed to ensure competitive bidding for contracts. KPMG is planning to produce a second audit that covers the coalition's management of the program through June 2004.If there were any justice in the world anymore, Bush, Cheney and a boat-load of their evil minions would be doing the perp-walk on CNN right now.
[snip]
KPMG outlined a series of other shortcomings, including the coalition's failure to install meters on Iraq's Persian Gulf export loading platforms, making it impossible to determine how much oil Iraq was exporting. KPMG said that it was unable to verify independently the value of crude oil Iraq bartered for Syrian electricity.
Kerry Resolve
In an interesting move yesterday, John Kerry laid out some guidelines on when he would feel it appropriate to bring our troops home from Iraq. The guidelines themselves - basically we broke it now we need to fix it, were not the interesting part. From this morning's Wall Street Journal (subscription):
Mr. Kerry's remarks, two weeks before he accepts the nomination of a Democratic Party with deep misgivings about the war, indicate the Massachusetts senator isn't preparing to spell out a timetable for rapid withdrawal of the roughly 140,000 U.S. troops now in Iraq. To the contrary, he suggested that Mr. Bush was more likely to do so, saying "I've heard [it] said by many people" that the White House might be gearing up to withdraw troops before the November election.I've heard all sorts of rumors about things that BushCo. might do to ensure their re-election; everything from dumping Dick "F*** Yourself" Cheney to a "July Surprise" capture or killing of bin Laden. But this is one I hadn't heard of. Despite all their promises to the Iraqis and, indeed, to Americans not to "cut and run," I have to say that upon hearing it, I really did think it would not be beyond them. Apparently so did Kerry:
"I'm prepared for any political move" on Iraq, Mr. Kerry said. "I'd put nothing past them."
[snip]
"I don't trust this administration's definition of where they're going or what they're going to do," he said. "They've already shifted everything. They shifted the reason for the war. They're capable of shifting anything."
Thursday, July 15, 2004
”Who's the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him?”
Thank you, Obi Wan Kenobi.
If you haven't been making sure to watch for the occasional columns of Barbara Ehrenreich in the New York Times, you really should. Today, she's brilliant in a piece titled "All Together Now." Her thesis is that our government and many of us have been the perpetrators and the victims of groupthink.
Ehrenreich, however, is right to remind us:
If you haven't been making sure to watch for the occasional columns of Barbara Ehrenreich in the New York Times, you really should. Today, she's brilliant in a piece titled "All Together Now." Her thesis is that our government and many of us have been the perpetrators and the victims of groupthink.
This is a surprise? Groupthink has become as American as apple pie and prisoner abuse; in fact, it's hard to find any thinking these days that doesn't qualify for the prefix "group." Our standardized-test-driven schools reward the right answer, not the unsettling question. Our corporate culture prides itself on individualism, but it's the "team player" with the fixed smile who gets to be employee of the month. In our political culture, the most crushing rebuke is to call someone "out of step with the American people." Zip your lips, is the universal message, and get with the program.It's about time someone with a national podium made judicious use of irony and snark. It is long past due and well deserved. We all know - at some level - the danger of groupthink, especially when it invades the halls of power and those who advise the powerful.
Ehrenreich, however, is right to remind us:
This nation was not founded by habitual groupthinkers. But it stands a fair chance of being destroyed by them.
Florida - Again?
In the recount debacle of 2000, I was ashamed to admit that I'm a Florida native. Once again, my home staters are making me nervous. Today's New York Times has an interesting - and scary - story on problems that continue to plague their voting systems. Seems the roll of felons to be purged was only the beginning:
Three years after Gov. Jeb Bush announced a new voting system that he called "a model for the rest of the nation," Florida is grappling with some of the same problems that threw the 2000 presidential election into chaos, as well as new ones that critics say could cause even more confusion this November.The pResident's brother, Jeb, has had four years to clean up this mess. A mess that nearly threw the entire country into a Constitutional crisis. Despite all this time and several millions of dollars spent in the effort, it appears that not only have they not fixed what was wrong, the things they've done - like electronic voting machines - have only made it worse.
A recent analysis by The Sun-Sentinel found that touch-screen machines in South Florida failed to record votes eight times more often than optical-scan machines in the March presidential primary.
Why Health Care Reform Fails
If you've ever wondered why all efforts at true health care reform fails, you need only look as far as the next quarterly report of earnings from one of the big HMO/Insurance companies. Results for UnitedHealth Group were in this morning's Wall Street Journal:
Now that a completely Republican controlled government has finished raising the status of the corporation above that of individuals, there is no way that true health care reform can ever pass through Congress. Unless of course we can vote back a little balance into the equation - and then continue to let all of our lawmakers know that universal access to health care is important to us all.
– UnitedHealth Group Inc. Thursday said its net income rose 36% in the second quarter, and raised its forecast for full-year earnings.All of the other HMO/Insurance companies are doing just as well and as in many businesses that are thriving, the bigger ones are buying up the smaller ones in an attempt to "rationalize" supply and demand. These same companies regularly make the list of top contributors to politicians - especially those with a strong business bent or those on key committees that could affect the health care industry.
[snip]
"We expect strong results from our businesses in the second half of this year," said UnitedHealth Chairman and CEO William W. McGuire, M.D.
Now that a completely Republican controlled government has finished raising the status of the corporation above that of individuals, there is no way that true health care reform can ever pass through Congress. Unless of course we can vote back a little balance into the equation - and then continue to let all of our lawmakers know that universal access to health care is important to us all.
Wednesday, July 14, 2004
Sometimes You Have to Relax
The news is exasperating - no matter where you get it from. Work is exhausting (sometimes) - no matter what you do. The world keeps spinning - no matter how much you might want it to stop.
So every now and again, you need to stop, take some deep breaths and enjoy what is beautiful in the world. This past weekend, I took an hour and drove up to the shore of Lake Ontario - just a short 10 minute ride - and took some photos. Below is one of my favorites. If you stare at it long enough and imagine you can hear the small ripples splashing up on the rocks; if you imagine that you can hear the seagulls squawking overhead; if you can imagine the slight evening on-shore breeze hopefully you'll relax a little, too.
Enjoy!
So every now and again, you need to stop, take some deep breaths and enjoy what is beautiful in the world. This past weekend, I took an hour and drove up to the shore of Lake Ontario - just a short 10 minute ride - and took some photos. Below is one of my favorites. If you stare at it long enough and imagine you can hear the small ripples splashing up on the rocks; if you imagine that you can hear the seagulls squawking overhead; if you can imagine the slight evening on-shore breeze hopefully you'll relax a little, too.
Enjoy!
Ooh - That's Gonna Leave a Mark...
John Kerry's campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill, opens a seriously large can of 'whup-ass' on Bush's campaign manager.
From Kerry's DBunker via Atrios:
You still here? Go!!
From Kerry's DBunker via Atrios:
July 13, 2004Go read the rest. This is what we've been waiting for! She hammers Bush-Cheney on the issues and the obfuscations, then closes with some of the best, most sublime snark ever seen.
Ken Mehlman
Campaign Manager
BUSH-CHENEY '04, Inc.
Dear Ken:
Over the past several months, allies of the President have questioned John Kerry’s patriotism while your staff has criticized his service in Vietnam. Republicans and their allies have gone so far as to launch attacks against his wife and your campaign has run $80 million in negative ads that have been called baseless, misleading and unfair by several independent observers.
You still here? Go!!
Bush's EPA Sabotaging NASA?
Okay, not really, but it makes you wonder.
NASA's $785 million Aura mission to study Earth's atmosphere was stranded on its California launch pad again today, the third launch date this week missed because of technical problems.
[snip]
The bus-sized Aura, built for NASA by Northrop Grumman Corp., is designed to monitor the health of the depleted layer of ozone gases in the stratosphere that protect Earth from solar radiation. It will also track pollutants in the atmosphere to see where they travel and how they interact, NASA said.
McCain Slaps Down Bush
The headline might be a little bit of hyperbole, but not by much. Seems fellow Republican John McCain doesn't agree with the Sock Puppet-in-Chief that gay marriage is an apocalyptic threat to American life. And he had the nerve to say so in public!
"The constitutional amendment we're debating today strikes me as antithetical in every way to the core philosophy of Republicans," McCain said. "It usurps from the states a fundamental authority they have always possessed and imposes a federal remedy for a problem that most states do not believe confronts them."McCain then provided a little bit of a history and civics lesson to BushCo., which has been greatly in need of such for a long time:
"The founders wisely made certain that the Constitution is difficult to amend and, as a practical political matter, can't be done without overwhelming public approval. And thank God for that," he said.As an aside; I really think that the Dems can take advantage of this failed attempt at amending the Constitution. It would be so easy to portray the Rethugs as close-minded and mean spirited in the only attempt in history to restrict the rights of Americans through the Constitution. It just doesn't get any uglier than that.
The Tax Man Cometh
It still amazes me that the news in the Wall Street Journal is so good while the editorial pages remain completely out of touch.
In today's edition, they report that, in large part because of BushCo.'s tax cuts, property taxes are on the rise all over the country. In fact, they are rising so fast in some areas that there have been so-called "voter revolts," where voters have forced the passage of caps and restrictions on further increases. John Kerry has labeled this phenomenon the "Middle Class Squeeze."
I'm feeling the "Squeeze!"
In today's edition, they report that, in large part because of BushCo.'s tax cuts, property taxes are on the rise all over the country. In fact, they are rising so fast in some areas that there have been so-called "voter revolts," where voters have forced the passage of caps and restrictions on further increases. John Kerry has labeled this phenomenon the "Middle Class Squeeze."
In many parts of the country in recent years, strapped local governments have imposed big increases in property-tax rates, as well as in home assessments, to fill budget shortfalls. In response, voters have organized efforts to repeal or slow property-tax boosts in states from Virginia to Oregon, in some cases with the support of frustrated local officials.On the editorial pages of the Journal, though, you can still find paeans to the Shrub's tax cuts for the rich with no mention of the "Squeeze." Regardless of the Journal, I know that this is indeed happening. Just last week I got a letter from the Tax Assessor's Office: my assessment - and therefore my taxes - were going up this year.
[snip]
For many homeowners, the increases have eaten into benefits they gained from President Bush's cuts in federal income taxes. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Economy.com Inc., a research firm in West Chester, Pa., estimates that nearly a fifth of the income-tax benefit Americans are receiving from federal tax cuts this year is going to pay for higher property taxes. Mr. Zandi says he expects property taxes to continue rising "very rapidly."
I'm feeling the "Squeeze!"
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
Garanimals Threat System
Yet another "no kidding" moment from our fearless leaders in Congress:
The federal government's color-coded threat system is too vague and confusing to help many local and state law enforcement officials prepare for possible terrorist attacks, Congressional investigators said Monday in a report that prompted leading members of Congress to call for an overhaul.Well we all knew that! Hell, the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI can't even come to an agreement about when there's really a new threat and what it means. But this has to be the - unintentionally - funniest sentence in this article in the NYT:
"I'm afraid if we don't make improvements in the system," Mr. Turner said, "the public's going to lose trust and confidence in that system and won't pay any attention to it anymore.""Going to lose trust?" "Won't pay any attention...anymore?" Please. When was the last time they even changed the color when announcing a new threat? In fact, when was the last time anyone really paid any attention to this system?
Where are we now, anyway? Are we at Threat Level Bert or Ernie?
UPDATE: Corrected "Garanimals" name and added graphics.
The Afghan Crystal Ball
If Bush wants to be judged on his accomplishments, let's take a look at what ought to be his primary concern: the real central front in the War on Terror. Afghanistan. I think that current events there not only provide a clear indication of BushCo.'s abilities, but also are a peek into the future of Iraq.
From this morning's Wall Street Journal (subscription):
From this morning's Wall Street Journal (subscription):
Afghanistan plans to hold its first democratic election in a few months. But in this highland village, a jumble of mud forts set amid terraced orchards and fields of ripe wheat, no one has registered to vote.While claiming that "Americans are safer" at every chance, Bush is ignoring the very country, the very militant group - the Taliban - that harbored bin Laden and helped train his followers. This is the aftermath of a war that was justified; imagine how little attention the aftermath of a bogus war based on bogus intelligence is getting. Iraq will become Afghanistan in a year - only worse.
Arapat, a farmer with the gilded skullcap and jet-black beard of a Pashtun tribesman, explained that some 60 Taliban insurgents had been to Shelem Kele just three days earlier. "We are all afraid. All the countryside here is under the control of the Taliban," whispered Mr. Arapat, who like many Afghans uses only one name.
Minutes later, the valley echoed with explosions as U.S. Army helicopters lobbed missiles into a mountainside. The same week, a Taliban unit operating just a few miles away executed 16 Afghans found to carry voter-registration cards.
Forest Catch-22
Proving that they haven't forgotten about the "plunder" part of "pillage and plunder:"
UPDATE: Edited for clarity and added the last bit of snark.
The Bush administration, shelving a Clinton-era decision that put 58.5 million acres of national forests off-limits to development, announced a new rule Monday that will allow the nation's governors to help decide whether roadless areas in their own states should be opened to logging or other commercial activity.This decision ensured that at least parts of remaining primal forests would be protected from development. Without roads, there can be no logging or development. BushCo., who never met an environmental rule that they couldn't hate, of course, had to remove this one impediment to industry. And in a final bit of irony and - for the trees - ignominy - if governors want to protect the forests, they have to ask. Ask whom?
Under the new rule, governors who want to protect pristine areas will have to petition the Forest Service to keep them off-limits to development. The Forest Service will make the final decision about what areas would remain roadless.That's the same Forest Service who decided to drop the old protection rules. I wonder who they'll side with?
UPDATE: Edited for clarity and added the last bit of snark.
Monday, July 12, 2004
Them
A graphic accompanying a news item on a local news program this evening caught my eye. The story was about - what else - terrorism and the New York Lieutenant Governor being in Rochester to talk about a "tough new anti-terrorism law." Unfortunately the graphic wasn't reproduced on their web site with the story.
It consisted of the word "TERRORISM" in large, capital type in front of a pair of eyes set in an ominously dark face peeking out from amongst the white folds of what could only be a vaguely "Arab" headdress.
I'm not sure what to say about the easy assumption that such a graphic should include such a person. But I think it says something very sad about where our newly begun endless War on Terror. Readers?
It consisted of the word "TERRORISM" in large, capital type in front of a pair of eyes set in an ominously dark face peeking out from amongst the white folds of what could only be a vaguely "Arab" headdress.
I'm not sure what to say about the easy assumption that such a graphic should include such a person. But I think it says something very sad about where our newly begun endless War on Terror. Readers?
The Terrorists Have Won
We might as well bring our soldiers home; pack up their rifles and artillery pieces, send back the ships and aircraft. Lock the borders. And will the last democrat (small 'd') out please turn off the lights?
Elections were held through out the Civil War without disruption. Not a single election was delayed or cancelled during either of the two World Wars. And yet Emperor Shrubby feels that just the threat of a terrorist attack is reason to plan on how to completely subborn our entire democracy so that he can ensure his re-election.
I'm not sure what the constitutional requirements are in such a situation; I'm not even sure there are any provisions for such a case. My guess is that aWol will have one of his White House lawyers draw up a "non-binding" legal opinion that states in case of a terrorist attack, the pResident can have himself crowned as Caesar.
U.S. counterterrorism officials are looking at an emergency proposal on the legal steps needed to postpone the presidential election in case of such an attack, Newsweek reported on Sunday.It's been on all the news sites, newspapers, and TV news shows. But it's reported in the same tone of voice as Brittney's latest marriage instead of with the outrage it deserves.
Elections were held through out the Civil War without disruption. Not a single election was delayed or cancelled during either of the two World Wars. And yet Emperor Shrubby feels that just the threat of a terrorist attack is reason to plan on how to completely subborn our entire democracy so that he can ensure his re-election.
I'm not sure what the constitutional requirements are in such a situation; I'm not even sure there are any provisions for such a case. My guess is that aWol will have one of his White House lawyers draw up a "non-binding" legal opinion that states in case of a terrorist attack, the pResident can have himself crowned as Caesar.