The Fulcrum

Saturday, March 27, 2004

Homophobic Bigots 

In case you were wondering; The Defense of Marriage Coalition are still an evil coven of Homophobic Bigots!


Friday, March 26, 2004

Frist, Hastert - Blowhards 

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist says that Richard Clarke may have lied while briefing Congress in the past. Odd that this didn't become an issue before Clarke's 9/11 commission testimony but after his book was published, no?

But the real kicker here is House Speaker Denny Hastert. When you read the following quote, I want you to think about Dick Cheney's refusal to give up information on who his energy panel talked to when forming public energy policy; I want you to think about Shrubby refusing to testify publicly and under oath to the 9/11 panel. Think about Condi Rice refusing to speak under oath to that same panel while still blabbing to every news camera that stands still long enough.

"We need to lean forward in making as much information available to the public as possible,'' Hastert, a Republican who represents Chicago-area suburbs and farms, said in a written statement."
Let me repeat that:

"We need to lean forward in making as much information available to the public as possible,''


Is there another word for this beside unmitigated gall?

What an ass.


Return to Friday Dog Blogging 

I haven't been very successful in making sure that every Friday is Dog Blogging day on The Fulcrum, but - hey - I'm not getting paid for this!



Here's Baylea protecting all of her favorite toys while also laying in her favorite bed. Yes, she has many more than just one toy and she has two beds; one in our bedroom and one in the living room for when we are watching TV. When I die, I want to come back as a dog in my house. Forget about that, I'd just like to live as well as my wife's dog does...


Homo Arachnidae 

Providing a short break from serious blogging is the news out today that Spider-Man 2 will debut on June 30.

I grew up reading about Spidey's adventures in Marvel comics and watching the Saturday morning cartoon. I still know the words to the cartoon's theme song. I drew Spider-Man and all of his villains; I'm pretty sure there was at least one Halloween growing up when I dressed up as Spidey. Needless to say, I was thrilled to find out that a live-action Spider-Man was going to be released in 2002. The movie did not disappoint- neither me nor the public; it did over $400 million in the US.

The next installment brings back the primary cast of Tobey McGuire and Kirsten Dunst and Sam Raimi will direct again. All three are said to have signed up for a third episode as well.

And the villain this time?

All three [actors and director] appeared at a screening of the trailer for "Spider-Man 2" as well as a lengthy action scene in which Spider-Man has a showdown on a train with the film's villain, Dr. Octopus.

Theater owners cheered wildly after seeing the clip and several said later that the film will be the biggest hit of the year.
Pass the popcorn!


International Insecurity 

It's not that BushCo. were ever all that interested in happenings around the world - except in Iraq - at the best of times. But while being bombarded from all sides by former administration members turned critics and the 9/11 commission, I have to wonder how much attention anyone at the White House (or The Pentagon for that matter, what with all the distractions they are dealing with right now) is paying to Taiwan and China.

Seems that a long-simmering cross-straights fracas is heating up in the wake of contentious and close elections. China is making some rather frightening remarks and nobody in Shrubby's administration has said a word about it. From Reuters:

China, in its strongest statement yet on the political crisis convulsing Taiwan since its controversial election, warned on Friday it would not stand idly by if the situation on the island spirals out of control.

"We will not sit by watching should the post-election situation in Taiwan get out of control, leading to social turmoil, endangering the lives and property of our flesh-and-blood brothers and affecting stability across the Taiwan strait," Beijing's policy-making Taiwan Affairs Office said in a statement.
Reading "official remarks" out of China is an art more than a science, but seemingly subtle statements can carry rather ominous meanings. "Not sit[ting] idly by" sounds perilously close to "we will intervene" to me in Beijing-speak. It's no secret that mainland-China has been looking for a good excuse to "reunite" China for years, yet there was not wide-spread reporting on who might be behind the "assassination attempt" on the current and re-elected President Chen Shui-bian. It would seem to have been the perfect "Sarajevo incident" regardless of the outcome for China to use to step in to "help" out their "flesh-and-blood brothers."

Shortly after the vote, Beijing condemned Chen for holding the island's first referendum in tandem with the presidential vote, but said only that it was closely monitoring post-election developments. On Tuesday, the Foreign Ministry stressed that no matter who won, Taiwan belonged to China.
The repercussions, should China intervene in Taiwan, are immense. Distracted by other matters and a quagmire in the Middle East, would BushCo. honor our military commitments to Taiwan? If we did, where would the troops come from. If we refuse to draw down troops from Iraq to help Taiwan, would we send in units too small to be of real help? Would China use non-conventional weapons if the US were to "interfere?" What then? Would BushCo., ever eager to try out the latest and greatest weapons systems, retaliate? With what type weapons?

The potential for this situation to spiral out of control is high. The amount of attention being paid to it by the current squatters in the White House is miniscule as judged by public remarks and the amount of energy being spent on launching ad hominem attacks on Richard Clarke.

Feeling warm and fuzzy yet?


Homeland Insecurity 

BushCo. have stated - numerous times - how committed they are to "homeland security." And they flog that commitment everywhere they go; they've attempted to use that commitment as a cudgel during the 9/11 hearings and all the extra-curricular press conferences on the periphery of those hearings as well.

Gives you that warm, fuzzy feeling, doesn't it?

According to the arch-liberal Wall Street Journal, you shouldn't feel too secure:

The year-old Department of Homeland Security is declaring a hiring freeze at two of its front-line units because of a potential $1.2 billion budget shortfall.

[snip]

The Homeland Security department, headed by former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge, was created last March by shifting personnel from 22 agencies. However, the budgets from the agencies' 15 pay systems weren't moved until last October, the start of the 2004 fiscal year. The 15 pay systems have been cut down to three that speak different languages, use different budgeting principles and budget codes, a senior department official said.

[snip]

Although other Homeland Security officials said the discussions have also included the possibility of furloughs, Mr. Murphy said Mr. Hutchinson didn't talk about furloughs at all.

The worst border problems in the country at the moment are in Arizona. Robert C. Bonner, the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, last month described the border security situation in Arizona, as a "complete mess."
Officials aren't even sure if the budget shortfall is real - the computer systems are so fouled up that there is a possibility that there is no budget shortfall.

But nobody's sure.

Still feeling all warm and fuzzy?


Thursday, March 25, 2004

Fundamentalists Stymie AIDS Prevention 

If you read the headline to this post and immediately though of a bunch of Southern Baptist bible-thumpers protesting AIDS prevention education you could be forgiven. We've all read about just such occurrences in the US.

But no, in yet more proof that fundamentalists of all types are cut from the same, tattered, soiled cloth, I'm talking about Islamic fundies in Indonesia. Despite the World Health Organization designating Indonesia as more of a potential AIDS hotspot than either China or Thailand, the mullahs are censoring any attempts at frank discussions of preventive measures - most especially condom use.

It's the same story(Wall Street Journal - subscription) you'd likely hear from our friends the Southern Baptists:

But when leaders of some of this country's Islamic fundamentalist groups hear about her tactics, they react with outrage. By urging people to protect themselves with condoms, they say, Ms. Arifin is promoting sinful behavior.

"This is not how to solve the root of this problem," says Neno Warisman, a popular singer of Muslim songs and former television star. A candidate for Parliament from the Prosperous Justice Party, which campaigns for Islamic causes, she says efforts to stop the disease's spread should focus instead on improving people's morality.
Sound familiar? There's more:

For two years Family Health International, a U.S. group that runs health-care projects in developing countries, has struggled to get a hard-hitting AIDS campaign onto Indonesian national TV. When a commercial depicting men patronizing prostitutes was broadcast briefly in 2002, the Indonesian Mujahiddin Council, an organization of fundamentalist Muslin clerics, sent a letter to TV stations claiming the advertisement could provoke the wrath of Allah. The stations immediately pulled the ad, even though Indonesian censors and the Health Ministry earlier had cleared it.
Even the description of the spineless media sounds familiar. And in case you think I'm stretching the comparison, even the Wall Street Journal makes the explicit comparison:

The resistance the Indonesian activists now face comes amid similar clashes elsewhere in the world. Over the past 20 years, blunt messages from AIDS-prevention campaigns have drawn fire from religious and socially conservative groups. In the U.S., some AIDS activists have complained of problems getting public-service announcements broadcast, because TV-station managers feared upsetting their audience.
Yet more proof of why religion has no place in the development of public policy. Can you see the path to theocracy that BushCo and his base supporters in the Religious-Whacko-Right want to lead us down?


Wednesday, March 24, 2004

Gay Marriage IS a Civil Rights Issue 

Not that most of us on the left needed a reminder - but many others did. Now they have it, writ very large.

Via Lambert at Corrente: Coretta Scott King

The widow of Martin Luther King Jr. called gay marriage a civil rights issue, denouncing a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban it.

Constitutional amendments should be used to expand freedom, not restrict it, Coretta Scott King said Tuesday.


It's a Blog Eat Blog World 

Many of you may know Steve Bates - The Yellow Doggerel Democrat - as a wonderfully astute poli-blogger; and that he is. But he used the word "doggerel" for a reason: the man can also write doggerel with the best of them.

If you'd like to see a little of yourself in one of his verses, go check out his latest. Just a snippet (hope you don't mind, Steve):

Not paying my bills,
Or wiping up spills,
Forget about walking the dog;
Not cooking my breakfast,
Or writing that check fast:
I've got to be posting my blog!


Up is Down; Part CMMVX 

First, the money quotes:

[A] report, issued Tuesday by the trustees who monitor the fiscal health of Medicare and Social Security, concluded that the fund that pays hospital bills in the health insurance program will run out of money by 2019, seven years sooner than they predicted a year ago.

The report says that the new law is a significant factor, because it will steer more money to private health plans and increase payments for health care in rural areas.
That, from the trustees' report to Congress. Seems pretty clear-cut, no? But in the Republican down-is-up world, that report is actually nothing to worry about. Think I'm kidding?

One of the GOP authors of the Medicare law swiftly defended it Tuesday. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., said the trustees' report "validates the reasons Republicans had in reforming Medicare and enacting a prescription drug benefit last year. The overall future health of Medicare depends on these reforms and our future action."
Whaaaa...?

Go read the rest of the story at The Oregonian.


Pledge of Allegiance 

I hope that the Supremes agree to hear the Pledge case - despite the fact that the complainants may lack standing. Or rather I should say that I hope they find a way to allow legal standing despite some controversy. And I hope, in what can be the only truly constitutionally sound finding, that they disallow the words "under god."

I think a reporter in today's San Francisco Chronicle got the reasons exactly right:

As a legal matter, the required outcome is plain: A principled application of constitutional law calls for the words to be stricken. As a political matter, however, the case is more complex: It pairs patriotism with religious faith, matters that inflame passions when they arise in isolation and are downright incendiary when they coalesce. But it is precisely because the pledge pairs religion and politics that the phrase must be removed.
We see every day the results of religion and patriotism being paired so closely: read any news report from the Middle East. The non-establishment clause has provided a wall between church and state that has served us well. Even though those who practice minority religions have historically been denigrated by the Judeo-Christian majority, they have not been persecuted as they might have been in other countries with lesser protections.

Something that is never reported in the stories about this case is that the words were not added to the original pledge until 1954 in the wave of political hysteria over "godless communism." There can be no reliance on preserving the original here. I hope the SCOTUS agrees to hear this case, I hope they rule by the constitution; then this can all go away and they can concentrate on more important things - like whether Nino "the Duck Hunter" Scalia should recuse himself from an upcoming hearing of the case of a close friend...


Wal*Mart Hasn't Disappeared 

Even though politics is heating up and the news from NASA about Mars is exciting, I haven't forgotten to keep my eye on the nemesis of retailing. Wal*Mart recently headed the Forbes' List of the top 500 companies by revenue, driven in large part by the lackluster economy forcing people to do more and more of their shopping at the discounter. Such notoriety and its continued desire to expand has forced the company to break with its past and become a serious contender in the money game that is Washington lobbying. (All quotes below from today's Wall Street Journal.)

In Washington, Wal-Mart has five lobbyists on its payroll, and a bench of hired guns led by Thomas Hale Boggs Jr., one of Capitol Hill's best-known lawyer-lobbyists. The company's political action committee was the biggest corporate donor to federal parties and candidates in 2003, with more than $1 million in contributions -- up from $182,000 during the 1997-98 election cycle, according to Federal Election Commission disclosure reports. Wal-Mart's PAC ranks as the second-largest in Washington, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan organization that tracks political giving.
Unlike most other lobbyists, who typically spread their money around pretty evenly between the two parties, Wal*Mart is focused on those who are most business friendly - read that as anti-labor and free trade.

Unlike most corporations, which contribute to both parties in rough proportion to Congress's partisan split, about 85% of Wal-Mart's checks go to Republicans. And recently Mr. Allen was named a "Pioneer" by the Bush campaign, meaning he has raised at least $100,000 by getting friends and colleagues to make contributions of up to $2,000 each.

The partisan giving is a nod to Wal-Mart's hostile relationship with organized labor and its dependence on free-trade agreements. Wal-Mart defends its lopsided support, saying it's supporting pro-business candidates.
I've written previously about Wal*Marts distaste for organized labor and their famously unfair labor practices, wages and dismal benefits packages. But of course none of that has made an impact on the retail - yet. And they are determined to get into other services - and wreck those sectors like they've nearly wrecked retailing and are in the process of doing to the grocery sector (they are nominally the cause of the recent California grocery strikes). Their latest attempt to get into banking was scuttled when "[s]mall bankers pleaded with Congress to spare them the fate of mom-and-pop hardware and variety stores, which, they said, were strangled by Wal-Mart. "

Don't think that top management is taking that defeat as a sign to slow down. Instead, they've decided to step up their lobbying efforts. The graph to the left shows the rapid increase in Wal*Mart's spending in Washington.

And with the spending of all that money, comes power where it counts - in the halls of Congress:

"Congressional allies rushed to offer advice, including Trent Lott, then Senate majority leader. Mr. Lott arrived in Bentonville in late 1999 with a simple message, according to a congressman who attended the meeting: Increase your profile and open your wallet.

So Wal-Mart executives set out to beef up their political action committee -- an account made up of voluntary employee contributions that executives use to make political donations. (Federal law prohibits direct corporate contributions to party committees and candidates.) At an August 2000 meeting attended by thousands of Wal-Mart managers, buckets were passed around for donations, as well as forms authorizing automatic paycheck deductions for the PAC."
With their newfound political power, Wal*Mart is poised to continue their expansion both inside and outside the US; they've recently won concessions from the Chinese government to open up to 35 stores there, despite a trade treaty with the US that retailers will be limited to 30 outlets. But of course like all businesses, there is only one thing in sight for Wal*Mart executives, profits. And damn everything and everyone, including - or perhaps especially - American workers. A phrase from a sentence early in the article, I think, sums it all up so neatly:

"...set out to transform itself from a company without a Washington presence to one that could bend public policy to suit its business needs."


I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to ponder the real purpose of "public policy."


Tuesday, March 23, 2004

Blue Mars? Green Mars? 

NASA will be making a "major" announcement about another Rover Opportunity finding at 2:00pm EST. They are being very tight-lipped. The last announcement was about the finding of evidence for water in the "blueberries" found all over the landing site.

NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe will be making opening remarks - something he does not typically do for scientific findings, including the water evidence. I had thought this might mean that some evidence was found of fossilized life, but one of the scientists presenting is a sedimentologist and the announcement panel - so far - does not include a biologist.

Very interesting.

UPDATE: Seems that Opportunity is sitting on an ancient beach! From Space.com:

We think Opportunity is now parked on what was once the shoreline of a salty sea on Mars," Cornell University's Steve Squyres, principal science investigator for the Mars rover mission, said in a statement provided to SPACE.com prior to a press conference today.

The rocks would be excellent preservers of biological signs, if life ever existed on Mars, Squyres said. That makes Meridiani Planum a prime target for future missions that would search for evidence of past biology.
It's not fossils, but it's wonderful news!

Wow.


9-11 Panel Showing Some Cojones? 

From the Boston Herald:

The ten-member panel had invited National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice to testify. She declined, with the White House citing concerns about separation of powers.

One panel member says that's not a good enough excuse.

Another mentioned the book written by former anti-terrorism adviser Richard Clarke, who accuses the Bush administration of downplaying the al-Qaida threat before 9/11.

Former Democratic Congressman Timothy Roemer also noted that Rice has been featured in the media disputing Clarke's claims. He suggests the debate shouldn't be played out in the media, but before the panel.
The panel members should put in some face-time on the networks and cable talking-heads shows and pound this into the public's perception: BushCo. is STONEWALLING.


Homophobic Bigots 

Defense of Marriage Coalition... yes, still a raving band of homophobic bigots.


Monday, March 22, 2004

2004: A Bush Odyssey 

There are plenty of other places to get the hard news about everything that's happened over the past couple of days and weeks. I've covered some things here - until I got so busy today. But the title of this post suggests that something more is happening now. Something that bodes ill for our country - in many ways - but, perhaps, something good as well.

If you remember the movie "2001: A Space Odyssey," you'll remember that each major turn of events in the evolution of humans was presaged by the perfect alignment of the moon, planets and that mysterious obelisk. In 2004 I think that a series of events are coming together; a series of very ominous events, strange events. The turning point, I think, was Bush's AWOL story gaining a little traction in the mainstream press; spurred on by lots of activity in the blogosphere. Then came the Madrid bombing. Yesterday (their time) was the Israeli assassination of the spiritual leader of Hamas, Sheik Ahmed Yassim. All this week, but especially today was Richard Clarke's book on how BushCo. totally bungled national security after 9-11 by monomaniacally concentrating on Iraq to the dangerous exclusion of al Qaeda.

These four events could plausibly be the beginning of the end for Bush and his neo-con cabal of puppetmasters.

The AWOL stories and the Madrid bombing have been dissected ad nauseum. But they are arrows to the heart of Bush's personal credibility and his abilities in foreign affairs. The Israeli assassination of Yassim, whether done with advanced US knowledge or not, widens the scope of potential terrorists operating against us; not exactly a stellar endorsement for his prowess in the war on terror. The Clarke story is potentially the story that brings down Bush's government.

That's no hyperbole. Bush has built his entire first term on his supposed heroic response to 9-11 and he's trying - on the backs of dead firefighters - to cinch his reelection on the same basis. Clarke, having worked for both Clinton and Bush, I think has a cachet that someone who only worked for the previous administration could never have. Some of the stories coming out of his book - at least the ones I've heard on the news - are stories that I would never have believed had they come from a blog. And yet, in retrospect, they fit so well with what we've learned about Bush and his minions since 2000. The speed and viciousness of the administration's response indicates that Clarke clearly hit a nerve.

Like the alignment of the planets in 2001 presaged a major change in human history, this alignment of events in 2004 could foreshadow the fall of the Bush empire.

My hope is that they don't also foretell of terrible events in our near future. If BushCo. bungles the events of the next couple of months as badly as they have the last couple of years, we could be in for some very bad times...


Busy, Busy, Busy... 

It's going to be one of those weeks. I just have a ton of stuff to do at work and at home so you can expect pretty light blogging for a while. I'll make an effort to post when I can.

If you really have to have all the best in liberal blogging, though just browse through my blogrolls to the left. You'll find plenty to keep you busy. In fact, the folks over at Corrente have been posting so often I can hardly keep up!

Leave me a comment, though, I still like knowing that somebody's stopped by!


Stuff

Politics
Move On


Previous Posts

Google

Web The Fulcrum
Free Google Page Rank Checker

TTLB Ecosystem

Bloggers Parliament
Bloggers Parliament

Issues and Google Bombs
visit LIBERAL FORUM

Shopping

Directories

Site Stuff

Creative Commons License

The Fulcrum Archives

Refering Sites

Who Links to Me