The Fulcrum

Tuesday, September 21, 2004

Bush Breaches Your Privacy 

If you flew on an American aircarrier in June of this year, you may want to call the airline:

The Transportation Security Administration proposed an order that would compel 77 airlines to provide names, addresses and other information collected through carriers' reservation systems for domestic travel during the month.

All passenger records will be compared with a newly concentrated security watch list, compiled by federal law enforcement, intelligence and security agencies.
This "security watch list" is probably the same one that caused the diversion of a flight today because Cat Stevens was on board.

I kid you not.


Bush Killed Jack Hensley 

Does Bush awake at night, the sweat dripping from his forehead, a scream dying in his throat, dreaming of the blood on his hands? Or does he sleep the sleep of the arrogant?

A posting on an Islamic Web site claimed Tuesday that an al-Qaida-linked group has slain a second American hostage in Iraq and threatened to kill a third hostage.

The claim that Jack Hensley, a civilian contractor, had been killed could not be verified immediately.


Bush is a Fabulist 

Fabulist. He lies, but he may (or may not) believe his own lies. So says Richard Cohen in today's Washington Post. And I agree:

Who'd like to be the last man to die for that? I'm looking for a show of hands. But more than that, I'm looking for someone to raise questions that go to the heart of this matter of life and death. In this sense, Iraq is fast becoming Vietnam -- only the stakes are higher. (Vietnam had no oil.) It is also Vietnam in the way the presidential campaign is handling it. Once again the GOP is playing the odious patriotism card to silence dissent. As for Bush, he talks about Iraq with the same loopy unreality as he does his National Guard service. He's a fabulist.
And in the same vein, Tony Auth's editorial cartoon in the Post puts it all into perspective. Fabulist, indeed.



Bush Still Lying About Iraq 

While this quote, from the New York Times, is from Condoleeza Rice, you can be sure that nothing passes her lips that hasn't been vetted by Bush and his brain, Karl Rove.

She [Rice] said ``there's no evidence'' that Iraq is falling into a state of civil war and said things are better than three months ago even though the Iraqi people ``are facing a very tough and daring insurgency.''
And the same can be said of Colin Powell (how low the once great general has fallen):

Secretary of State Colin Powell, interviewed Tuesday on ABC's ``Good Morning America,'' called the situation ``a difficult struggle'' but said ``to say we can't deal with it, this sort of attitude that we're on the verge of defeat is absolutely wrong.''
What f***ing universe are these two living in? Cause it's not the same universe where this is happening:

Deadline looms for American, British captives in Iraq
American contractor beheaded in Iraq
Iraq bombs cause civilian deaths
Iraq: busload of corpses discovered
Camp Pendleton Marine killed in Iraq
Ex-Michigan man killed by homemade explosive in Iraq
Senior Sunni clerics assassinated in Iraq
Had enough?


Bush Allows Iran to Build Nukes 

By bogging down the majority of our military power in Iraq (and to a much lesser extent Afghanistan), and linking so much of our policy in the remainder of the Middle East to Israel, Bush has ensured that we do not have the means to enforce demands that Iran discontinue its nuclear program.

Gholamreza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, told reporters in Vienna Iran had begun converting 37 tonnes of raw uranium into material which is fuel for nuclear centrifuges -- the machines that enrich uranium.

One nuclear expert has said that, if enriched, that would be enough material for five nuclear weapons.
Are you safer now than you were four years ago?


Bush Killed Eugene Armstrong 

Just as surely as if he'd grasped the knife in his own hands and sawed through Armstrong's neck; George W. Bush killed Eugene Armstrong.


Monday, September 20, 2004

Where Are All the Bill Moyers? 

Via Altercation, I found this wonderful speech given by Bill Moyers on the duties and the state of modern journalism.

Ed Wasserman, among others, has looked closely at the impact on journalism of this growing conglomeration of ownership. He recently wrote: "You would think that having a mightier media would strengthen their ability to assert their independence, to chart their own course, to behave in an adversarial way toward the state." Instead "they fold in a stiff breeze" - as Viacom, one of the richest media companies in the history of thought, did when it “couldn’t even go ahead and run a dim-witted movie” on Ronald Reagan because the current president’s political arm objected to anything that would interfere with the ludicrous drive to canonize Reagan and put him on Mount Rushmore. Wasserman acknowledges, as I do, that there is some world-class journalism being done all over the country today, but he went on to speak of "a palpable sense of decline, of rot, of a loss of spine, determination, gutlessness" that pervades our craft. Journalism and the news business, he concludes, aren’t playing well together. Media owners have businesses to run, and "these media-owning corporations have enormous interests of their own that impinge on an ever-widening swath of public policy" - hugely important things, ranging from campaign finance reform (who ends up with those millions of dollars spent on advertising?) to broadcast deregulation and antitrust policy, to virtually everything related to the Internet, intellectual property, globalization and free trade, even to minimum wage, affirmative action and environmental policy. "This doesn’t mean media shill mindlessly for their owners, any more than their reporters are stealth operatives for pet causes," but it does mean that in this era, when its broader and broader economic entanglements make media more dependent on state largesse, "the news business finds itself at war with journalism."
It's incredible. It's important.

Read it.

Now.


Quagmire Update 

Could this be the first shot in a Iraqi civil war?

Gunmen killed a Sunni Muslim cleric as he entered a mosque in Baghdad to perform noon prayers Monday, the second slaying of a cleric from the influential Association of Muslim Scholars in as many days, the group said.


No Blonde Jokes, Please 

If you haven't found BlondeSense yet, you're missing a true gem of the blogosphere. Three women with some serious political commentary, humor and snark, they also throw in a little feminist commentary, posts on everyday life and some damn fine Photoshop work.

BlondeSense, Patricia and Jaye will keep you informed, entertained and coming back. Go check them out. It's an every day read for me.


Louisiana Burnishes its Image 

Although you could hardly expect anything else, Louisiana voters overwhelmingly approved an amendment to their state constitution banning gay marriage.

With 95% of precincts reporting, the amendment won approval with 79% of the vote and support for it was evident statewide. Only in New Orleans, home to a politically strong gay community, did the race appear to be close, and even there the amendment was passing by a small margin.

"It's gratifying to see the people of Louisiana had an opportunity, as distinguished from judges, having the final say on the issue of whether traditional marriage will continue to be the fundamental institution in our state," said Darrell White, a retired state judge and consultant for Louisiana Family Forum, which pushed hard for the amendment.
Like most of these amendments, the gay community and civil rights activists will challenge the amendment on procedural and constitutional grounds. But the damage has been done; Louisiana has confirmed outsiders' impression of the state as backwards and bigoted.


The Shifting Sands 

It seems that BushCo. has decided that Iraq being the central front in the War on Terror is not working out so good. So, as they often have, they are working to lower expectations so that almost regardless of the outcome, they can tout it as a success. Witness this bit from this morning's Wall Street Journal (subscription):

President Bush is moving to control the Iraq debate with a weeklong effort that signals U.S. resolve to see through that country's chaotic experiment in democracy while tapping the power of incumbency for his re-election campaign.
Two things of note; 'experiment' connotes that the Iraqis are conducting this on their own. Seems to me that it's more our experiment in preemptive war. Also, 'chaotic experiment' makes it seem as though perhaps the Iraqis just aren't cleaning up after themselves in the lab.

Somehow chaotic experiment doesn't capture the horror and bloodshed of over a thousand dead American soldiers, thousands of injured soldiers, tens of thousands of dead Iraqis and a country that is slipping closer and closer to civil war. It's an experiment, alright. One that's in the process of blowing up in Bush's face.

But the effort continues of lowering expectations. One gets the feeling that by the time November 2 rolls around, if Iraq hasn't torn itself to pieces in civil war, Bush will consider it a "key victory in the War on Terror."


The End of the Weekend 

It was a beautiful, late summer weekend. The mornings were cool, the days were warm. And the evenings...



Friday, September 17, 2004

Anticlimactic 

Will any of the crap from Iraq stick to Bush? Despite clear evidence that he - at best - misled us into this quagmire, his poll numbers on Iraq remain well above 50%. From this morning's Wall Street Journal:

Drafts of a report from the top U.S. inspector in Iraq conclude there were no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, but say there were signs that fallen Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had dormant programs he hoped to revive at a later time, according to people familiar with the findings.
Of course this was only rationalization number 1 of many...


Thursday, September 16, 2004

Feel the Outrage - Again 

You must watch this.

If you've forgotten the outrage of Florida in 2000, if you've lost the passion to kick Bush's ass back to Crawford, if you have doubts about whether your vote counts... then click on the link above.

Thanks to John at AMERICAblog for the link.


Follow the Light, MoDo 

Maureen Dowd in today's NYT:

Here's how bad off the Democrats are: They're cowering behind closed doors, whispering that if it should ever turn out that Republicans are behind this, it would be so exquisitely Machiavellian, so beyond what Democrats are capable of, they should just fold and concede the election now - before the Republicans have to go to the trouble of stealing it again.

[snip]

In this vast left-wing conspiracy theory, Mr. Rove takes real evidence on W.'s shirking and transfers it to documents doomed to be exposed as phony (thereby undermining the real goods), then funnels it through third parties to Dan Rather, Bush 41's nemesis on Iran-contra. A perfect bank shot.
It's an idea that's been floating around the blogosphere for a while now, but MoDo gives it a national stage. And although presented in a somewhat tongue-in-cheek manner, there's no doubt that she considers the possibility to be very real.

The upshot?

The administration has been so dazzling in misleading the public with audacious, mendacious malarkey that the Democrats fear the Bushies are capable of any level of deceit.
The much deserved paranoia we bloggers have been feeling for so long is finally getting the national airing it deserves. However, I'd say that paranoia is the wrong word. What's the correct word when your worst fears are not baseless?


REGISTER TO VOTE! 

There are only a few days remaining to register to vote in the upcoming elections. You can bitch and moan all you like about what BushCo. have done to our economy, our military and our country, but if you don't vote it doesn't mean a damned thing.

In fact, if you don't vote, you have absolutely no right to complain at all.

From AMERICAblog: did you know that 8 of the 19 September 11 hijackers were registered to vote in the US?

Do you want an al Qaeda member's vote to go uncontested?

Register.

Vote.


Meanwhile... Back in Afghanistan 

In Afghanistan, the country that should be the central front in the War on Terror - you know, where the Taliban and Osama and al Qaeda are located - things are not a whole lot better than in Iraq.

A rocket slammed into the ground near where Afghan President Hamid Karzai's helicopter was approaching to land in an eastern city Thursday, forcing him to return to Kabul, officials said.

Karzai was headed to the city of Gardez, 60 miles south of Kabul, for a school-opening ceremony, aboard a U.S. military helicopter. Presidential spokesman Jawed Ludin said the rocket came down in a village about a mile from Gardez, while U.S. military spokesman Maj. Mark McCann said it hit 300 yards from the landing zone.
Although... now that I really look at that news report... I'm not sure that USA Today uses that font. Hmmmm...


Good Morning Viet Nam Iraq! 

FUBAR: adj. acronym: F***ed Up Beyond All Repair. Military slang; likely originated during the Korean or Viet Nam conflicts.
On the ride to work this morning, there was a brief discussion on the situation in Iraq on Morning Edition. I didn't catch who the speaker was, but he offered two scenarios for the future of Iraq: The first - and the best we could hope for - was continued violence and unrest for the foreseeable future. The second - and worst - was that the violence would spiral completely out of control into civil war. This Middle East expert didn't offer any sunnier prospects. He obviously hasn't drunk the neocon Kool-Aid yet.

Then there's this from the Wall Street Journal, this morning:

Gunmen kidnapped two Americans and one Briton in the Iraqi capital, the Iraqi Interior Ministry said Thursday.

The three were seized from their house in Baghdad's al-Mansour neighborhood at dawn Thursday, said ministry spokesman Col. Adnan Abdel-Rahman. He didn't give their identities or say who they worked for. Col. Abdel-Rahman had earlier said the three were all British nationals.

[snip]

Separately, a car bomb exploded Wednesday in a town south of Baghdad, killing two people and injuring 10, said Col. Abdel-Rahman. The car was targeting a National Guard checkpoint in Suwayrah, about 40 miles (60 kilometers) south of Baghdad, Col. Abdel-Rahman said. One national guardsman was among the dead, he said. No further details were available.

[snip]

Also Wednesday, three beheaded bodies were found on a road north of Baghdad, authorities said.
No... no quagmire here, move along, nothing to see. Look, over there, Jessica Simpson is playing Daisy Duke!

UPDATE: More on the first story in today's NYT.


Wednesday, September 15, 2004

A Question of Health Care 

Can anyone out there give me a logically and humanely defensible reason why Americans should not have universal health care?

Anyone?


Republican Senators a Little Slow on the Uptake 

The headline on this NYT article made me laugh out loud:

Senators See Budget Shift on Iraq as Sign of Trouble
A "sign of trouble?" Just a sign? You'd think that perhaps when the military death toll reached 1,000 they'd have realized that something was wrong. Or maybe the first time BushCo. came back to Congress for an additional $20 billion. Maybe all the car bombings and IEDs should have been a sign.

Where the hell have these idiots been for the past year?

Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said today that the Bush administration's request to divert more than $3 billion from reconstruction work in Iraq to security measures was a sign that the American campaign in Iraq is in serious trouble.

[snip]

Mr. Hagel went on to say that the request for reprogramming the money "does not add up, in my opinion, to a pretty picture, to a picture that shows that we're winning. But it does add up to this, an acknowledgment that we are in deep trouble."
Do they not watch TV in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee? Are they not allowed to read newspapers? Just because their president doesn't read anything - including Presidential Daily Briefs - doesn't mean they can't.

Who voted for these clowns?


If a Tree Falls in the Woods... 

If John Kerry writes an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal laying out his economic plan for his presidency will anyone read it?

Kerry's article is relatively short and lays out a pretty stark choice for WSJ readers; readers who are nominally supposed to care about the economic fundamentals of our country. They can either accept the continuation of Bush's policies which have reaped a staggering deficit with no end in sight, or they can take a chance on Kerry bringing financial sanity back to fiscal policy.

Forty-three months into his presidency, George Bush's main explanation for this dismal economic record is an assortment of blame and excuses. Yet what President Bush cannot explain is how the last 11 presidents before him -- Democrats and Republicans -- faced wars, recessions and international crises, and yet only he has presided over lost jobs, declining real exports, and the swing from a $5.6 trillion surplus to trillions of dollars of deficits.

[snip]

With the right choices on the economy, America can do better. American businesses and workers are the most resilient, productive and innovative in the world. And they deserve policies that are better for our economy. My economic plan will do the following: (1) Create good jobs, (2) cut middle-class taxes and health-care costs, (3) restore America's competitive edge, and (4) cut the deficit and restore economic confidence.
But like the tree falling in the woods with no one there to hear it, WSJ subscribers have to read this piece without prejudice in order for it to "make a sound." I hope that those who must work with facts and numbers every day have the clarity of vision to see truth across the aisle.


Tuesday, September 14, 2004

A Safe Bet 

On CNN this afternoon:

The founder of the group Texans for Truth said Tuesday that he is offering $50,000 to anyone who can prove President Bush fulfilled his service requirements, including required duties and drills, in the Alabama Air National Guard in 1972.
I'm betting they'll never have to pay.


W is for Waffle 

Lets put the whole "Kerry is a flip-flopper" thing to bed - again. John over at AMERICAblog excerpted this AP report on Bush's "reversals" over the past four years. Just print this out and keep it in your pocket. The next time you're with some Rethug, spouting the party line just take it out and have them read it.

If he is a flip-flopper, Kerry has company.

In 2000, Bush argued against new military entanglements and nation building. He's done both in Iraq.

He opposed a Homeland Security Department, then embraced it.

He opposed creation of an independent Sept. 11 commission, then supported it. He first refused to speak to its members, then agreed only if Vice President Dick Cheney came with him.

Bush argued for free trade, then imposed three-year tariffs on steel imports in 2002, only to withdraw them after 21 months.

Last month, he said he doubted the war on terror could be won, then reversed himself to say it could and would.

A week after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Bush said he wanted Osama bin Laden "dead or alive." But he told reporters six months later, "I truly am not that concerned about him." He did not mention bin Laden in his hour-long convention acceptance speech.

"I'm a war president," Bush told NBC's "Meet the Press" on Feb. 8. But in a July 20 speech in Iowa, he said: "Nobody wants to be the war president. I want to be the peace president."

Bush keeps revising his Iraq war rationale: The need to seize Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction until none were found; liberating the Iraqi people from a brutal dictator; fighting terrorists in Iraq not at home; spreading democracy throughout the Middle East. Now it's a safer America and a safer world.

"No matter how many times Senator Kerry flip-flops, we were right to make America safer by removing Saddam Hussein from power," he said last week in Missouri.

Bush has changed his positions on new Clean Air Act restrictions, protecting the Social Security surplus, tobacco subsidies, the level of assistance to help combat AIDs in Africa, campaign finance overhaul and whether to negotiate with North Korean officials....


Thanks to commenter Hephaestion at AMERICAblog for the title of this post!


Quagmire Update 

Remember all the links that were found between al Qaeda and Saddam? Remember how so many of the 9/11 hijackers were from Iraq? Remember how vital it was to invade Iraq so that we could interdict the terrorists in their training camps? Remember how the world stood beside us as we began the bombardment of Baghdad?

Me neither.

Yet we've lost over 1,000 fine young American soldiers and killed somewhere between 20,000 and 50,000 Iraqis - only some of whom could be classified as "insurgents." And every day the situation gets worse; closer and closer to where not even the most jaded (or conservative) among us can object to using the term "quagmire."

From this morning's Wall Street Journal (subscription):

A car bomb exploded near a police station in the Iraqi capital early Tuesday, as dozens were applying to join the force, killing at least 47 people and wounding nearly 114, officials said.

Separately in Baqouba, gunmen in two cars opened fire on a van carrying policemen home from work, killing 11 officers and a civilian, police and hospital officials said.

Also Tuesday, saboteurs blew up a junction where multiple oil pipelines cross the Tigris River in northern Iraq, setting off a chain reaction in electricity generating systems that left the entire country without power, officials said.
UPDATE:See also here and here.


Monday, September 13, 2004

Sixteen Miles on the Erie Canal 

I remember reading about the Erie Canal growing up, but sometimes I forget how lucky I am to live so near such an important piece of history. The canal winds its way through several of the towns near us and it always provides beautiful or interesting scenery regardless of the season.

This photo was taken just outside the town of Macedon, NY looking more or less East from the lock at Macedon. This was an incredible, late summer day - as you can see.

Enjoy; a little bit of history, from me to you!



USCIS 

That's the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service. We were in Buffalo today so that my wife could get her "permanent" Permanent Resident Card. Permanent in quotation marks because you really have to renew them every ten years. It was the usual government office. Nobody working too fast, but they were all very nice and it actually went really well.

So... I'm afraid to ask, because I haven't even had time to look at the news today, what did I miss?

More later, I hope!


Sunday, September 12, 2004

North Korea Gone Nuclear? 

Go check out AMERICAblog, and follow the links there. Is it possible that on Thursday the DPRK had its first nuclear weapons test? There were some reports of a mushroom cloud, but everyone from the Chinese to our own government is saying that it definitely was not a nuclear test.

Thursday was the 56th Anniversary of the founding of the DPRK; and the North Koreans are known to stage important events for such dates.

Is BushCo. downplaying this because it doesn't fit his "safer now" campaign theme? Will we only find out the truth when countries downwind start reporting high levels of radiation? Why do we have to be so distrustful of this administration?

This is very, very worrisome.


Saturday, September 11, 2004

Three Years On 

Where have we come in three years? How far have we traveled from that brilliant September morning? When I woke up this morning, I showered and headed for the golf course. It seemed to be just another beautiful late summer Saturday.

But on NPR they were talking about that other September morning. Nobody on the golf course talked about it. Almost as if it would somehow be wrong to speak of such horror while enjoying such a great day. On the way home the radio was still tuned to NPR and they were talking to survivors of the Pentagon attack.

Last night, on CNN, someone said something about the world being completely different after September 11, 2001. But the world only seems different if you really think about it. If you go through life without really remembering that specific day, if you squint your eyes just a little, that day almost disappears. And then you see the homemade memorial to the firefighters that appears on the same street corner every year now.

It's maddening to know that the mastermind behind the horror is still at large. And I've written a hundred times about how the current resident of the White House is culpable for his remaining free. And it would be wonderful if every so often on the evening news they could talk about the impending trial of Osama bin Laden. But they can't. And they don't.

More importantly, I think, is the journey we've all made since that day. Each journey has been different. Each has ended in a different way at a different place. Some of us have wound up staring down a sunlit fairway trying to figure out which club to pull from the bag. Others of us have ended up in a blisteringly hot desert, too far from home, staring down a sunlit street trying to figure out which weapon to grab.

I don't have a neat way to tie up this post. Mostly because I don't think we've come to a point where it's possible to tie up all we feel and think and remember about September 11 in a neat way. Thoughts spin off in a thousand different ways... splintering and shattering like glass. Maybe someday we'll be able to talk about that day like we talk about Pearl Harbor, like a day in history. Strange that three years could still be too close.

I hope you remembered today. I hope you found a little peace in your thoughts.


Friday, September 10, 2004

Dick Steps on His Cheney - Again 

If I understand his clarification of his earlier remarks about Kerry correctly, BushCo. have screwed up the War on Terror so badly that it doesn't matter who gets elected.

Vice President Dick Cheney sought to "clean up" a controversy over comments he made this week, saying that the country must brace for a potential terrorist attack no matter who is elected president.
As I look at it again, I can't see anything wrong with my analysis.

"I did not say if Kerry is elected, we will be hit by a terrorist attack," Cheney told the newspaper. "Whoever is elected president has to anticipate more attacks.
Nope, nothing wrong at all...


Another Reminder of Bush's Failure in "The War on Terror" 

Bush won't say his name, despite promising almost three years ago that we'd "smoke him out of his hole" and get him "dead or alive." But, through his number two, Osama bin Laden continues to poke his finger in America's eye, taunting us and enthusing his followers.

For the second year in a row, al-Qaida released a video tape rallying its supporters near the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, and experts were investigating if the images of the terror network's No. 2 leader were new or not.

[snip]

"The defeat of America in Iraq and Afghanistan has become a matter of time, with God's help," al-Zawahri said on the tape. "The Americans in both countries are between two fires, if they continue they bleed to death and if they withdraw they lose everything."


House Works Overtime 

Perhaps a little something (WSJ - subscription) for workers to smile about.

The House voted to bar the Bush administration from enforcing new wage rules that make it easier for employers to deny overtime pay to white-collar and administrative workers.

The White House has threatened to veto the prohibition to keep the rules in effect. But in a rare victory to organized labor, 22 Republicans broke ranks on the 223-193 vote, despite strong pressure from their party leadership.
The Senate seems to support a similar move in what could be an important defeat to Big-Business-BushCo. A key quote came in discussions yesterday from Rep. Robert Andrews, an New Jersey Democrat:

"Overtime is not a gift from America's employers. It is the right of American workers."


One Year of The Fulcrum 

In the shadow of the second anniversary of 9/11, I was feeling frustrated about where BushCo. was taking our country. I was feeling anxious about whether we might be attacked again, whether I would be called up from my Reserve status for the neo-con nightmare in the Middle East. I had been reading several blogs for years, but something about the nexus of frustration and anxiety and anger of last year drove me to create my own blog.

The last year has passed quickly, but not without pain, not without more frustration and and anxiety. Afghanistan has been quickly forgotten, Iraq is, by any definition, a quagmire, terrorism has spread and grown in response to our misbegotten foreign policies and adventures. There were personal crises to deal with as well. But through it all, the catharsis of researching and writing this blog have helped.

Thank you to everyone who's stopped by here in the past year. I hope that the past 12 months of posts have provided my few steady readers - and the occasional passerby - with some new information and a bit of humor or irony now and again. Mostly, I hope that I've managed to bring a slightly different take on events, that I have, indeed, been "tilting the world a little more to the left."


Thursday, September 09, 2004

Another Bush Flip-Flop 

New York Times headline:

Bush Now Backs Budget Powers in New Spy Post
The money paragraph:

President Bush said on Wednesday that he wanted to give a new national intelligence director "full budgetary authority," a sharp shift from an earlier position and an acquiescence to a major recommendation of the Sept. 11 commission.


Opening an Eastern Front? 

I trust Vladimir Putin as much as I trust George W. Bush. Perhaps less. That's why the thought of the Russians opening a second front on the War on Terror is so frightening. Especially given the way this paragraph from a story in the Toronto Star is worded:

It offered a $10 million (U.S.) reward for help in hunting two separatist Chechen rebels, and a top Russian general said the military will strike "terrorist bases in any region of the world" — but would refrain from using nuclear weapons.
I know that it is currently unfashionable to consider root causes of terrorism, but I have to wonder if the Russians have learned anything from our blundering about in the Middle East. And honestly, do we really need another country lumbering about the world with their outsized military trampling anyone they consider to be terrorists or terrorist supporters or anyone even contemplating terrorist related program activities?

And consider this; our military is the best trained, best equipped and - honestly - the most compassionate army in the world (in general); and we had abu Ghraib. Imagine the Russian Army, which brutalizes its own soldiers, holding prisoners in some out of the way break-away province of the Balkans or the Trans-Caucasus or elsewhere. Consider the damage that our best-in-the-world smart weapons have done to the civilian population in Iraq and Afghanistan, now imagine the less than high-tech weapons, poorly maintained by abused conscripts of the Russian Army and Air Force being unleashed in the confines of a city.

Bush's doctrine of "pre-emptive warfare" is loose upon the earth. Imagine the horror.


Well... Duh! 

I'm not sure if the editor who wrote the headline for this article in the Wall Street Journal (subscription) was being funny or ironic or if the idea had just occurred to him for the first time. Here's the headline:

Demand for Oil Could One Day Outstrip Supply
Here's what prompted what, in the military, we used to call a BFO: a Blinding Flash of the Obvious.

A respected oil-forecasting group predicted that the energy industry may be unable to produce enough oil to meet projected demand by the end of the next decade, in a study that lends support to a small chorus of analysts who warn that a peak in petroleum output is looming in the years ahead.

In a presentation yesterday, analysts from Washington-based PFC Energy warned that the world won't be able to produce more than 100 million barrels of oil a day, only some 20% more than current output of about 82 million barrels a day, and well below demand projections for the end of the next decade.

"Even production of 100 million barrels a day can only be sustained for a few years," said Roger Diwan, a PFC analyst. "Every year since the 1970s, we have been consuming much more oil than we have been discovering."
Now where have we been hearing that? Um... give me a few minutes...

Combine this "revelation" with oil companies revising their reserves downward in recent years and you get a real, live petroleum shortage. Not in a hundred years, not in fifty. Maybe in as little as 10 years. The result? Well, at first, just rising prices. But with so much of the world economy dependent on petroleum by-products, pricing will only do so much to curb consumption.

I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out what comes next. Leave your thoughts in the comments.


Bush Should Have Been Court Martialed 

Seems the feces is finally hitting the electric air movement device over Bush's so-called military service.

AMERICAblog has plenty on the story. And you should really read the Washington Post's story, too. But just look around at any of the news outlets. They are finally starting to get it.

Here are just the things that we know about that could have resulted in a court martial being convened.

  1. Disobeying a direct order.

  2. Failure to get a flight physical.

  3. Being suspended from flight duty.

  4. Adversely affecting unit readiness.

  5. Failure to attend required drill dates.

  6. Failure to attend Guard duties in Alabama.

  7. Failure to join a National Guard unit in Massachusetts.
Of course, in lieu of a court martial, his commander and the National Guard could have also discharged aWol from the Guard and transferred his commission to the Active Component. He might have even met a couple of the 150 guys he jumped over to get his cushy slot in the TANG. I'm sure they would have had a few words to say to young W.


Wednesday, September 08, 2004

Halt, Who Goes There? 

I checked out my Site Meter stats this evening, and what do I see? Instead of my average 75 hits, I've had 220!!

Whoever all those new visitors are, I wish you'd take a moment to leave a comment and let me know who you are.

Regardless: Hello! Stop by again soon.


"Poisoned Patriotism" 

Read this great Newsweek piece by Christopher Dickey. He explores, via a book by Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., the way that patriotism has been hijacked by flag-wavers and jingoists. Picking up Schlesinger's book would probably be a great idea, too; "War and the American Presidency."

But a couple of quotes from the article really caught my eye. Some I had seen, others not. Check them out:


Most disturbing of all, I’ve come across a lot of men and women who’ve grown afraid of their fellow Americans. It’s as if their patriotism has been poisoned. They say they feel their flag has been appropriated by narrow-minded zealots. Their hopes are being crushed by cynical politicians. Their sons and daughters are being sent to die in wars that seem to have no end, and anyone who questions those politicians or those wars is being branded a traitor.

Christopher Dickey
From the Article



"You don't 'prevent' anything by war except peace."

President Harry S Truman



"Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right."

Carl Schurz
Nineteenth-century immigre



...the United States should stand for freedom and independence wherever her flag is unfurled, but "she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy." By launching foreign wars of interest and intrigue, [he] predicted, the fundamental underpinnings of American policy would change "from liberty to force." America "might become the dictatress of the world: she would no longer be the ruler of her own spirit." Foreign adventures and foreign threats are, as often as not, pretexts for curtailing the freedoms Americans believe they should be fighting for.

John Quincy Adams
1821



Dick - Go Cheney Yourself 

It's official, I guess... At least to "Crashcart" Dick: Democrats are terrorist enablers. In remarks that have been roundly criticized, the VP, yesterday, claimed that if Americans vote for Kerry/Edwards in November, they'd be responsible for future attacks on the US.

U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney on Tuesday warned Americans about voting for Democratic Sen. John Kerry, saying that if the nation makes the wrong choice on Election Day it faces the threat of another terrorist attack.
Dick should return to his secure, undisclosed location. And Cheney himself.


Tuesday, September 07, 2004

1,000 

AP is reporting that the US Military deathtoll in Iraq is now 1,000. Fourteen in the past two days, alone.

W. Wrong war, wrong leader. Just wrong.


The End of Laughter and Soft Lies 

Via Atrios, we find Texans for Truth.

Check them out, give them a little turkee if you can. Their first project:

Texans for Truth, established by the 20,000-member Texas online activist group, DriveDemocracy.org, has produced a 0:30 second television advertisement, "AWOL." The ad features Robert Mintz, one of many who served in Alabama's 187th Air National Guard -- when Bush claims to have been there -- who have no memory of Bush on the base. In other words, Bush failed to fulfill his military duty while others were dying in Vietnam.


All the Children Are Insane 

In today's New York Times, David Brooks tries to have us drink the neo-con Kool-Aid on the causes of terrorism. This consists of disparaging anyone who might try to look at root causes. Because, in the conservative mind, terrorists are evil. Not just the generic evil we use in everday speech, but the theologic eveil which springs from the dark recesses of the universe and has no cause which is explicable to the human mind.

Three years after Sept. 11, too many people have become experts at averting their eyes. If you look at the editorials and public pronouncements made in response to Beslan, you see that they glide over the perpetrators of this act and search for more conventional, more easily comprehensible targets for their rage.

The Boston Globe editorial, which was typical of the American journalistic response, made two quick references to the barbarity of the terrorists, but then quickly veered off with long passages condemning Putin and various Russian policy errors.

The Dutch foreign minister, Bernard Bot, speaking on behalf of the European Union, declared: "All countries in the world need to work together to prevent tragedies like this. But we also would like to know from the Russian authorities how this tragedy could have happened."
If we are not to look too deeply at why people - over the long run - can be driven to such despicable acts (and who would deny that they are other than that?), then what hope is there that future generations will ever be able to avoid the mistakes that we have made? What hope is there that our children and grandchildren will be able to live in a world where nobody is so desperate that they would join in such a cause?

This death cult has no reason and is beyond negotiation. This is what makes it so frightening. This is what causes so many to engage in a sort of mental diversion. They don't want to confront this horror. So they rush off in search of more comprehensible things to hate.
So David Brooks would have us believe that terrorism and terrorists just arise ab nihilo. Accepting that at face value would mean that there is no reason to understand - either the person, their cause or the roots of that cause. And that makes it so much easier to sell the kind of hatred and xenophobia and depersonalization which is the first necessary step to being able to kill another human being.

That is a sure recipe for future disaster.


The Killer Awoke Before Dawn 

With one major ambush on Monday killing 7 US troops and another soldier killed today, the American death toll in Iraq reached 992.

Remember, this in a country where aWol says everything is under control. Where democracy is growing. Where many, many schools have been painted. Where US soldiers have been unable to patrol large swaths of the country since April. Where "major combat operations" ended.

You remember this, right?


Weird Scenes Inside the Gold Mine 

Seems that Dick Cheney's former and future employers just can't quite keep ahead of the impending troubles with their military contracts. Despite getting the work without a competitive bid, despite picking up a plum "Cost-Plus" type contract, despite getting lots of maneuver room because of their close ties to the VP, seems Halliburton can't quite get it right.

From this morning's WSJ (subscription):

The U.S. Army plans to move within months to break up the multibillion-dollar logistics contract that Halliburton Co. has to feed, house and look after U.S. troops in Iraq, and to put out the work for competitive bid.

The move, laid out in an internal Army memorandum, comes after more than a year in which Halliburton's work in Iraq under the contract has been plagued by accounting turmoil and accusations of overcharging. The contract, which the memo values at as much as $13 billion, has been used since early last year to provide massive support services for U.S. troops in Iraq and Kuwait, including housing, dining halls, transportation and laundry.
So what were the problems again?

Pentagon auditors said in a report last month that KBR hadn't provided satisfactory details to back up more than $1.8 billion of work in Iraq and Kuwait. The Army still is debating whether to begin withholding payment on 15% of all billings until KBR is able to resolve the accounting backlog.
Some of those "details" include charging the military for meals that were never served, charging something on the order of 5 times the market price for gasoline and assorted other discrepancies.

I wonder if this will have an effect on how much "deferred compensation" Cheney will get?


Monday, September 06, 2004

Summer's End 


Almost as if it could make us forget the awful summer weather we've had, this past weekend was absolutely incredible; sunny and warm. A perfect weekend for barbecue, beer and friends.

I hope you all had a wonderful Labor Day Weekend as well.


Sunday, September 05, 2004

October Surprise? 

From the ever well informed AMERICABlog, comes the first glimpse at the ace BushCo. may have up their collective sleeves.

The United States and its allies have moved closer to capturing Osama bin Laden in the last two months, a top U.S. counterterrorism official said in a television interview broadcast Saturday.

"If he has a watch, he should be looking at it because the clock is ticking. He will be caught," Joseph Cofer Black, the U.S. State Department coordinator for counterterrorism, told private Geo television network.
Suddenly he-who-cannot-be-named is important again? Did'nt aWol say he wasn't important any more? Wasn't the Never-Ending-War-on-Terror bigger than one man?

I hope you wouldn't put it past these guys to have Osama on ice somewhere, just waiting for the "opportune time" to parade him before the public.


Saturday, September 04, 2004

Thank You, Sir, May I Have Another? 

More "Compassionate Conservatism?"

A day after President Bush heralded his efforts to help the elderly cope with increased medical expenses, federal officials announced the largest premium increase in dollars in the Medicare program's history, raising the monthly expense by $11.60 to $78.20.


Friday, September 03, 2004

Clinton to Have By-Pass Surgery! 

Bill Clinton was admitted to a New York City hospital today:

A Democratic Party official told Reuters that Clinton, who served two terms as president from 1993 to 2001, had checked into the hospital with chest pains. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, could not confirm that Clinton would undergo bypass surgery.

The severity of Clinton's coronary problem was discovered after tests at Westchester Medical Center in Valhalla, New York, ABC News reported. His coronary results were not favorable and he was found to have multiple lesions, it said.

CBS News said doctors found a blockage.

CNN quoted a source close to the former president as saying the surgery could take place as early as Saturday.


Young Republicans Love the War 

As long as they don't have to fight it.

In more than a dozen interviews, Republicans in their teens and 20s offered a range of answers. Some have friends in the military in Iraq and are considering enlisting; others said they can better support the war by working politically in the United States; and still others said they think the military doesn't need them because the U.S. presence in Iraq is sufficient.


"Frankly, I want to be a politician. I'd like to survive to see that," said Vivian Lee, 17, a war supporter visiting the convention from Los Angeles.
I'm sure at least one or two of the nearly 1,000 dead American soldiers had plans they would have liked to survived to see, too, you little shit.


Some Speech is More Equal Than Others 

Mayor Michael Bloomberg needs a serious refresher course in American History, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. While discussing protestors, specifically those who have confronted Republican delegates in the streets, he claims that while the Republicans' speech is protected by the First Amendment, the protestors speech makes them... well let's let the Mayor tell you what he thinks it makes them:

"It is true that a handful of people have tried to destroy our city by going up and yelling at visitors here because they don't agree with their views," Mr. Bloomberg said. "Think about what that says. This is America, New York, cradle of liberty, the city for free speech if there ever was one and some people think that we shouldn't allow people to express themselves. That's exactly what the terrorists did, if you think about it, on 9/11. Now this is not the same kind of terrorism but there's no question that these anarchists are afraid to let people speak out."
That's right, if you're a Republican, speaking out makes you an American. If your not it makes you a terrorist.


Trampling the First Amendment in New York 

There is an interesting twist to the arrests of protesters in New York City during the RNC. It seems that the law requires arrestees to be processed and charged or released within 24 hours. Many had been held over 36 hours without any processing. During the same period, people arrested for other, minor infractions like shoplifting had been processed and released.

Why would the city hold the protesters so long (WSJ - subscription)?

According to Mr. Siegel, the teen's mother called Manhattan central booking to inquire about her son and was told that "all demonstrators would be held until President Bush left town." Mr. Bush makes his acceptance speech tonight at the Republican National Convention.
The judge in the case ordered the city to release 560 protesters.


Matter - Antimatter Reaction 

In his acceptance speech, aWol said that his tax cuts had created a strong economy. Anyone who actually reads the newspapers could only shake their heads at this remark. But an article in that ever-so-Liberal Wall Street Journal set my thinking straight on the issue.

Seems the tax cuts are working exactly as BushCo. wanted them to:

The back-to-school shopping season got off to a sluggish start, as midprice department stores, discounters and specialty-apparel retailers rung up disappointing sales in August, reinforcing concerns that consumers are feeling the effects of a shaky and uneven economic recovery.

Upscale shoppers helped luxury department-store chains post hefty gains. Moderate- and lower-income shoppers continued to feel the bite of higher gas and grocery bills and lackluster job growth.
So while you and I are struggling to fit ever more expensive gas and groceries into a budget that grows only on the expense side while the income side stagnates or shrinks, just what are those folks who actually benefited from the tax cuts doing with all that extra money?

Upscale department stores posted strong gains. Neiman Marcus Group Inc., Dallas, said same-store sales jumped 15% for its Neiman Marcus Stores and Bergdorf Goodman units combined, citing strength in designer handbags. Same-store sales at Nordstrom Inc., of Seattle, rose 7.2%, on brisk demand for accessories.


No Program Left Unfunded 

George W., the leader of the Party of Small Government, sure made a lot of promises to spend money last night. This is my continuing effort to unspin the Republican National Convention.

Of course W. mentioned his now widely criticized "No Child Left Behind" program, his now discounted drug discount program for seniors and, of course, his disastrous tax cuts. On top of that he pledged continued spending on the never-ending War on Terror, Social Security reform, broader job training and expanded access to health care. Don't think he forgot a bone for all his business backers either; tax cuts for corporations were thrown on the heap as well.

And - again - making his tax cuts permanent.

Nowhere in this litany of programs did he mention any way to pay for it all. Nowhere did he mention how he planned to pay down the incredible national debt he's managed to build. Nowhere did he provide any indication how he was going to finance the ever expanding quagmire in Iraq and Afghanistan.

One of his too often repeated phrases last night was "nothing will hold us back." Nothing it seems except being bogged down in interminable war and the ability to pay for your promises, George.


Fate? 

From George Pataki's speech last night (if I remember it correctly):

"...fate gave us George W. Bush for President"


Fate, Apparently, Wears a Black Robe


Thursday, September 02, 2004

Our "Friends" in Pakistan 

G.W. really knows how to pick our country's friends, no?

A new assessment of Iran's nuclear program by the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency says that, as early as 1995, Pakistan was providing Tehran with the designs for sophisticated centrifuges capable of making bomb-grade nuclear fuel. It also finds evidence that, as of the mid-August, Iran had assembled and tested the major components for 70 of the machines, which it showed to inspectors from the agency.
Are you safer now than you were four years ago?


This is Sure to Help Matters 

There are no legitimate excuses for the use of suicide bombers to kill and maim civilians. It is a breach of every known law, agreement or treaty on the conduct of warfare.

That does not, however, excuse this:

Israeli forces blew up two large apartment blocks in the Gaza Strip on Thursday, making scores of Palestinians homeless after suicide bombers killed 16 people in Israel.

The army, carrying out its biggest Gaza incursion in weeks, said the operation in the Khan Younis refugee camp targeted twin five-storey buildings used by Palestinian militants for attacks on Israeli soldiers and settlers.
How can this possibly help the problem the Israelis and Palestinians are having? This could not even be considered something so stupid as "treating the symptoms rather than the cause." This is inflaming the cause and creating further symptoms. But with both sides led by doddering old fools, holding grudges and memories from decades ago, there seems little hope in the short-run for anything else.


Headlines for the Sane 

Some might accuse us liberal bloggers of writing sensationalistic headlines and posts. But must of us would say we are just unspinning the spin. Eric Alterman seems to feel the same way and nails it with the following:

You can call me “liberal.” I am liberal. But the headlines I’ve written comport more closely with the view held by most of the civilized world. The opposite views—the ones around which our political circuses spin—are held only by a tiny minority of people. It is the world’s colossal misfortune to have this tiny minority at the helm of the world’s most powerful nation, despite their side having lost the last election by any reasonable measure.
I don't post about or refer to Alterman's Altercation often enough anymore. If you don't read him at least once a week, you really should.


More Anti-Spin 

This is from MSNBC:

As speakers at the GOP convention trumpet Bush administration successes in the war on terrorism, an NBC News analysis of Islamic terrorism since Sept. 11, 2001, shows that attacks are on the rise worldwide - dramatically.

[snip]

Moreover, the level of sophistication is increasing. Terrorism experts point in particular to the attacks apparently carried out by Chechen rebels during that 10-day period. The rebels, whose top military commanders have been Arabs, are operating at a whole different level.

"You have bombs on board planes, bombs at a train station and now a hostage taking," said Roger Cressey, a former deputy National Security Council director of counterterrorism. "This is all coordinated. These things do not happen by accident, and in fact, United States officials are frantically trying to determine if they are a forerunner of an attack aimed at the U.S."
So in a twist on the classic campaign question, I have to ask you: "Are you safer now than you were four years ago?"


The Quantum Physics of the Vice President 

What alternate universe is Dick Cheney living in? I know he's spent most of the past three years in a "secure, undisclosed location," but didn't he at least have cable? The spin he put on reality last night reminded me of the sub-atomic particle property called - appropriately enough - spin. It's a derived number related to a particle's angular momentum (both orbital and inherent), but that's a discussion for another post.

Here's part of what Tricky Dick had to say:

The vice president hailed President Bush as a "superb commander-in-chief" who has helped restore the economy and will lead the nation to victory in the war on terror. Mr. Bush "does not deal in empty threats and half measures," Mr. Cheney said in his prime-time speech to delegates and a nationwide television audience.
Let's try to nullify the spin on those two issues.

I assume that Crash-Cart Cheney was referring to a massive increase in the national debt, tax cuts for the rich, huge unfunded mandates to the states (NCLB), 1.1 million jobs lost and a sputtering recovery. Did I miss anything?

As for leading us all to "victory in the war on terror," I'm not even sure where to start. Cheney must have been referring to ignoring Afghanistan where the Taliban not only wasn't destroyed and bin Laden was never found, but they are still there and increasing their hold on the country - again. Or maybe it was the complete fabrication used to take us to war against a country that it turns out has absolutely nothing to do with the war on terror. Or maybe he was referring to the Korean peninsula where we are drawing down troops who are facing a potential enemy who actually does have nuclear weapons. Actually on this subject I could give examples for days. And really, you all know them already.

If Dick Cheney were a quantum particle - no small feat, given his increasing bulk in recent years (they must not have a treadmill in his hideout) - physicists would have to come up with a new way to measure spin.

Oh, and to return to something I said in a previous post, if Arnold and Laura and the twins were the lipstick, Dick was the pig.

UPDATE: In fact, I found a picture to support my last assertion.

Photo via AMERICABlog via Eschaton; photo editing is mine.


Wednesday, September 01, 2004

Feeling Safer? 

A little more anti-spin for you today.

Everyone and their twin daughters has been telling us that aWol has made the world a safer place with his "War on Terror." Someone should read this article to him:

Iran has announced plans to turn tons of uranium into a substance that can be used to make nuclear weapons, the U.N. atomic watchdog agency said Wednesday in a report stoking concern about Tehran's nuclear agenda.

[snip]

Another diplomat, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said that enough highly enriched uranium could be produced from the hexafluoride derived to make several explosive devices.
Makes you feel all warm inside, doesn't it?


The GOP Freak Show 

A former body builder turned actor turned politician. Two temporarily sober frat girls turned campaign tarts. And the prototypical Stepford Wife and ex-Librarian turned ignorant science advisor on stem cells. Throw in a miscellaneous mix of morons and there you have it: day two of the Republican National Convention otherwise touted as the "People of Compassion Night."

Sure.

Schwarzenegger is compassionate about any woman with a great rack - as long as she doesn't complain about being groped. The Bush Twins are compassionate about their booze - just like daddy! And Laura - what the hell is she passionate or compassionate about? She's a walking advertisement for Prozac. And all of them are fronting for the most bigoted, homophobic party platform since the Reconstruction South.

Welcome to the new GOP; where they smile to your face while they pick your pocket, molest your daughter and play Pope to our modern Galileos.


Tuesday, August 31, 2004

Secret Service Destroys First Amendment at R.N.C. 

Via Jesus' General, we learn that Secret Service Agents at the RNC were actively preventing the press from speaking with Michael Moore who was attending with press credentials from USAToday. Specifically, there is audio of Andrea Seabrook, from NPR being rousted from interviewing Moore in the press area:

[Andrea] Seabrook: Well, well I'm not...the Secret Service has blocked off that area. They're calling it a...a hazard because of the number of people who are a gathered around him. There aren't that many people, but the Secret Service won't let me around him anymore, so I think a the access to him might be cut off for a moment. We'll try to get back with him.

[snip]

Seabrook: Yes, I am in the middle of a...you might be able to hear the Secret Service yelling into my mic at the same time. There, there are a bunch of Secret Service that have surrounded Michael Moore's section. There are three or four reporters with him right now, but they are trying to kick all of the reporters and press photographers who are around him out of his area. The convention staff is also here. They're standing here telling us that we have to move from this are...they're obviously disturbed by the fact that Michael Moore is here and want as little public here as possible.
Un-F***ing-Believable. I wonder if there was any video of this... I wonder whether these guys were wearing brown shirts... I wonder when we are going to get our goddamn Constitution back from these MBSF?


Object of My Desire 

I love my iMac - I've said that many times before. But, for a computer it's starting to get a bit long in the tooth (at 3 and half years old - and it was the previous year's model when I bought it). But Apple, as they so often do, has just broken through design and computing barriers with their newest iMac. And I want one!

Feast your eyes in this:



Other than the mouse and keyboard, that's it.

Don't mind my drooling...


WTF? 

The BS about Kerry's wartime service - of which NONE of the Chickenhawks, including their Pretender-in-Chief, have any - has reached its illogical end with this (via Rising Hegemon):

Delegates to the Republican National Convention found a new way to take a jab at Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's Vietnam service record: by sporting adhesive bandages with small purple hearts on them.

Morton Blackwell, a prominent Virginia delegate, has been handing out the heart-covered bandages to delegates, who've worn them on their chins, cheeks, the backs of their hands and other places.
I have friends who were killed and others who were wounded in war; I find this disgusting and degrading. If I were to see someone with one of these bandages on, I would be hard pressed to keep myself from ripping it off in the most painful way possible and then bitch-slapping them.


Countering the Spin 

This week, rather than cover what goes on inside the Republican National Convention, I want to continue something I started last week. I will try to highlight stories that counter the cyclonic spin put on world events by the Republicans.

Yesterday delegates in NYC heard how wonderfully aWol has prosecuted the War on Terror. Today we see this:

An Iraqi militant group said it had killed 12 Nepali hostages and showed pictures on an Islamist Web site on Tuesday of one of them being beheaded.

"We have carried out the sentence of God against 12 Nepalis who came from their country to fight the Muslims and to serve the Jews and the Christians...believing in Buddhah [sic] as their God," said the statement by the military committee of the Army of Ansar al-Sunna.
Can you imagine how things would be going were he not paying attention?


A Once Great Man Laid Low 

It's sad to see John McCain prostitute himself (WSJ - subscription) in the service of George "Please Don't Send Me to War" Bush. I never would have voted for McCain had he won the Republican nomination, but I had - have - a deep respect for his service and for many of his views. But seeing him on the stage and hearing him encouraging others to vote for what is so obviously a failed administration - and knowing that he know it is as well - is just sad.

Sen. John McCain swept aside his differences with President Bush tonight and urged voters to re-elect him, heartily endorsing the Iraq and anti-terrorism policies of his 2000 rival for the White House.

[snip]

Mr. McCain said Mr. Bush has earned re-election because of his resolute actions since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 -- a key theme on the convention's opening night.
I'm not sure where the phrase got its start, but putting up John McCain (and all the other moderates that will speak) really is just "putting lipstick on the pig." Or in this case, the elephant. John McCain could do so much better.


Monday, August 30, 2004

A Manifesto for the Rest of Us 

Via And Then... comes the manifesto of PRKA (People Reluctant to Kill for an Abstraction). I'm so sorry I missed this last week. A sample:

Last Thursday, my organization, People Reluctant To Kill for an Abstraction, orchestrated an overwhelming show of force around the globe.

At precisely 9 in the morning, working with focus and stealth, our entire membership succeeded in simultaneously beheading no one. At 10, Phase II began, during which our entire membership did not force a single man to suck another man's penis. Also, none of us blew himself/herself up in a crowded public place. No civilians were literally turned inside out via our powerful explosives. In addition, at 11, in Phase III, zero (0) planes were flown into buildings.
Please, read the rest. It is precisely what we need right now. Pass it on to your friends and families.


"I'm Givin' Her All She's Got..." 

Alzheimers is slowly dimming another bright light. Not a political light, but rather one of those entertainers who will always make a true geek smile.

The five-day tribute, "Beam Me Up Scotty ... One Last Time," had been in the planning stages for more than a year before it was revealed, earlier this summer, that the 84-year-old [James] Doohan, who lives in Redmond, had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Coming so soon after the death of the similarly afflicted former president, Ronald Reagan, the family's announcement added greater urgency — and no small degree of poignancy — to preparations.

Instead of going ahead with a purely festive "retirement party" for the beloved actor, Planet XPO elected to join forces with the Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation to raise awareness of the disease. With the cooperation of Doohan's family, representatives of both groups quickly were able to refocus the event's theme, turning Saturday night's banquet into a benefit.

Doohan's final formal public appearance is expected tomorrow morning, when his star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame is unveiled, in front of the Hollywood Entertainment Museum.
Lieutenant Montgomery Scott has been a part of my life since I can remember. It appears that he will no longer remember the love of science or the love of engineering he inspired in so many children and adults. But those memories will remain, spread out like stars in the night, in the minds and imaginations of generations of Star Trek fans throughout the world.


Remember These Guys? 

Afghanistan will hold its first national elections soon. Or at least that's how the Republicans, flogging aWol's foreign policy and War on Terror accomplishments, will tell the story. Here's some more things you won't hear in NYC this week from inside the convention:

In the past year, violence has escalated across Afghanistan despite the presence of NATO forces, including 18,000 U.S. troops. Taliban insurgents, remnants of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network and others have been waging hit-and-run attacks against military and civilian targets throughout the country.

Hundreds of Afghans have been killed, and humanitarian relief workers have halted operations in many rural areas.
Didn't we "defeat" the Taliban? Weren't we going to chase the remnants of al Qaeda to "the ends of the earth?"

Can we really afford Four More Years of such success?


Quagmire - Countering the Spin 

We're likely to hear a lot this week about how well things are going in Iraq; about how great the Iraqis have it now that Saddam is gone. Here are a couple of things (WSJ - subscription) that you won't hear from any of the speakers at the Republican National Convention:

Iraqi National Guard troops are supposed to police their own hometowns and villages. But in many cases the soldiers refuse to arrest anyone for fear the insurgents will seek revenge against their families.

"I've seen insurgents put [remote-detonated roadside bombs] 100 meters from my Iraqi National Guard checkpoints," said Staff Sgt. Nicholas Fox, who oversees a company of about 90 Iraqi soldiers outside Fallujah. When Sgt. Fox asked the Iraqi soldiers why they didn't stop the insurgents, the soldiers replied that they were afraid their families would be targeted.

Two Iraqi National Guard units in al Anbar province, which encompasses Fallujah and Ramadi, were overrun earlier this month by insurgents who stormed their headquarters. The insurgents kidnapped the units' battalion commanders. The dead body of one of the commanders was found a few days later; the other man is still missing. The insurgents also took most of the two 800-soldier battalions' guns, helmets and body armor.

The police haven't performed well, either. Recently the Marines detained the police chief for the province, who is suspected of cooperating with the insurgents. His officers were guarding the provincial governor's home when it was attacked by insurgents and the governor's two sons were abducted. The police didn't fire a shot.
Just remember these incidents while you're listening to BushCo. tout its accomplishments in Iraq.


"Play Nice" 

I've been very happy to see that so far, protesters in NYC have been very well behaved. While there have, of course, been some scattered arrests, so far protests have been enthusiastic, loud, very large and very peaceful. The major networks have not focused exclusively on the fringe and even the Wall Street Journal's coverage has been balanced.

Estimates for Sunday's protest vary, naturally. But even if you split the difference (between 120,000 and 400,000), it was the largest protest against a National Convention in history. Any protests against the Democrats pale in comparison. In fact, the protests are beginning to resemble - in size - those against the Viet Nam War.

Is it too much to hope that not only will the protesters continue to "play nice," but that their message gets through the spin?


Friday, August 27, 2004

Who's Poor? 

As a follow-up to my post below about more people living in poverty, I wanted to find out just what poverty means to the government. So I Googled "federal poverty level" and followed the first link to the web site of the Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines.

I had an idea of what I'd find for one data point. On some news show I'd seen that the Federal Poverty Line for a family of four is somewhere around $18,000 per year. That floored me. I'm trying to imagine my wife and I getting by on $18K per year and it boggles my mind. For comparison, here's the entire table:



Find your family size there, then imagine trying to get by on the amount shown. Think really hard about how different your life would be; how much more difficult. Some of you may actually fall into these guidelines.

Now ask yourself again: Are you better off than you were four years ago? Is the country better off now - forget (if you can) for the moment that we are wasting lives and money on a baseless war - if more families are living in poverty than were doing so four years ago?


Bush Created "Shadowy Groups" 

As aWol makes vague motions about filing lawsuits or banning campaign ads from "shadowy" 527 groups, can we all please remember that he signed into law the legislation that created them? Secondly, why are they "shadowy?" The law very clearly lays out what they can do and what they can't in the election cycle. What's "shadowy" about that?

So the real questions to be asked are:

Did W not read the bill he signed into law?

If he did read the bill and felt that 527 groups were "shadowy," why did he sign it?

If he did read the bill and agreed with the provisions for 527 groups at the time, what has caused him to flip-flop now?

If he didn't read the bill and signed it anyway, doesn't that make him a fool who is now being hoisted by his own petard?

Just what is a petard and why would anyone get hoisted by it?
Just askin'...


How Are You Doing? 

Are you better of now than you were four years ago?

The number of Americans living in poverty rose last year, as did the number of those without health insurance, according to government data that immediately stoked debate over President Bush's economic policies.
Seems like the answer is pretty evident, no? Well, not if you're G.W.:

Mr. Bush, speaking at a campaign rally in Las Cruces, N.M., didn't mention the Census Bureau data. He focused on the economy's resilience in the face of a rash of bad news in the past three years. He also defended the role of his tax cuts, while conceding that "we have more to do to make this economy stronger."
No, actually, you don't. We've had enough of what you've done to the economy. To borrow a phrase: "You're fired."


Thursday, August 26, 2004

Quagmire 



Bush is a Coward 

Bush is afraid of a man in a wheelchair. He is afraid of a simple letter signed by nine Senators. More than anything in the world, he is afraid of the truth.

So afraid, in fact, that he had Senator Max Cleland, the Vietnam veteran who lost an arm and both legs in the war, met on the road well outside his Crawford, TX hiding place with a road block. He wouldn't show a disabled veteran the basic, Southern hospitality that demands at least a face-to-face meeting and a glass of iced tea. Instead, Max Cleland was met by the Secret Service at about the same distance from aWol's ranch as one of his infamous "Free Speech Zones." His letter was refused.

This is disgusting behavior, but I am not surprised. BushCo. has treated every soldier and veteran that gets in its way (Cleland, McCain, Kerry, Shinseki, etc.) in the same manner - and worse.

Bush is a coward.


Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Greatest Olympic Sport? 

Need I say more?


Sorry, I just couldn't resist.


That This Could be the Final Word 

A moving, yet cogent essay by Karen Spears Zacharias in this morning's New York Times, should - if the world were fair - be the final word in the Swift Boat Veterans' treachery.

Amid the confusing debate over John Kerry's Vietnam record, one thing is clear: war - particularly the trauma of war - corrodes memory.

[snip]

So, then, what about John Kerry and the Swift boat crew? Enough already. There are some things we'll never know. But there are also some things that are beyond dispute - even in the chaos of war. Mr. Kerry went. He served. Lucky for him, he got to come home and raise his daughters.
Read the rest; it will make you yearn (even more) for the end of this idiotic argument over facts that should not be in dispute.


Oh, Behave! 

Let me add my voice, however small it may be, to those imploring anyone protesting the Republican National Convention next week to be on your best behavior. The RNC has already promised to link any violence or out of control events as being directly related to the Democratic Party, regardless of the truth.

The potential for things to really get out of hand is just too large. The security will be massive and the officers and agents are going to be on edge due to the usual terrorist warnings trumpeted in the run-up to any large event lately.

An interesting note about just how massive the security will be; just one part of the RNC security force is - of course - the NYPD. How big a part?

The backbone of security is being provided by the 37,000-member New York Police Department, which has a budget larger than all but 19 of the world's standing armies.


Not So Swift 

It's bothered me that groups like the Swift Boat Veterans that have been attacking John Kerry can get away with what they do. Not from a legal standpoint but rather from an intellectual standpoint. How can they float these ads, full of information that is, at best, disingenuous - with much of it being outright contradicted by official records - and the public nods their heads as though they were making a valid point to be considered and the media regurgitates the claims in the form of "analysis" that is void of anything resembling the word?

The message is largely aimed at the Republican "base" but is also meant to place a nagging doubt in the undecideds. Yet the majority of these people are not idiots; they are literate - by a strict definition of the word. But therein lies the problem, I believe. And this problem is not strictly confined to conservatives or the shrinking pool of undecided voters; liberals and progressives of all kinds are guilty as well.

Somehow, over the past decade, the respectability of rigorous thought has declined to the point where even admitting that nuance can exist is cause for derision. From the right there has arisen the disdain for the "intelligentsia" of the left. They even adopted a Russian word in order to conflate knowledge with the still-not-dead fear of Communism. From the left - although with much less toxicity - a dismissal of all thought that seems tainted by reactionary conservatism or religion. From the masses an all sides comes a general distaste for the efforts of thought required to process the richness of information available today. The result seems to be an equivalence of opinions, regardless of how informed they may be, and an equivalence of information regardless of veracity.

This has lead to the encroachment of "on the one handedness" in our professional media and to a lack of critical thought by the majority of the public on important issues. Those who are experts in a field of discussion are derided as "nerds" or "wonks." Anyone who talks about and bases their decisions on the nuance and the shades of grey of a particular point will earn the epithet of "flip-flopper." While those who are unchanging regardless of how the world shifts beneath their feet are hailed as "steady leadership in times of change." If you learn from history you are too "sensitive" to be an effective leader. Somehow, our current president's incuriousness is seen as charming and likeable.

So this lack of critical thought in so much of the citizenry and its leadership makes it possible for the Swift Boat Veterans to toss out unfounded accusations and outright lies into the public discourse without worry that they will be exposed before they have done their surrogate dirty work. It allows Bush to conflate the Swift Boat group with progressive groups like MoveOn.Org despite the differences in their membership, methodology and the veracity of their claims. This aversion to intelligence and rationality allows those of baser instincts to poison our political discourse to their own advantage without fear that their misdeeds will be discovered, or that if they are discovered they know that no rational dissection of them need be feared. The lack of trust in experts allows the EPA and FDA to suppress scientific findings and bases for policy and replace them with religious dogma.

If America is fortunate enough that John Kerry wins in November - if the world is lucky enough - we can only hope that a new administration will restore our faith and confidence in rational thought and in those who engage in it. We can hope that a Kerry/Edwards administration will reverese the trend of filling government posts with scientific oversight with party flacks. If not, I can see a new Dark Ages descending on us all.


WSJ Off the Reservation? 

It's only a small step, to be sure, but the editors at the Wall Street Journal actually criticized aWol this morning in an unsigned editorial (subscription).

President Bush didn't tell the full story on Monday when he denounced TV ads by such "527s" as the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. But not because he didn't agree to the Kerry campaign's demand that he repudiate the specific Swift Boat ads. Our gripe is that Mr. Bush assailed the very campaign-finance system that he helped create.

[snip]

In our view, this was among the worst moments of Mr. Bush's term. Having helped to midwife the current campaign-finance system, it ill behooves him to blame others for the way this world works.
These guys have been the staunchest of BushCo. apologists, what's going on here? While there have certainly been worse moments in this disasterous term, that the Journal would point this out in such stark terms is surprising.

Is this the beginning of the end?


Tuesday, August 24, 2004

Rotten at the Top 

The responsibility for the abuse at abu Ghraib lies at all levels of command, right to the very top.

Senior Pentagon military and civilian officials share part of the blame for creating conditions that led to the prisoner abuse scandal at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison, an independent commission of U.S. defence experts has concluded.

The panel, appointed by U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and headed by former defence secretary James Schlesinger, was released on Tuesday.
Anyone who knows anything about the military knew this in their hearts, despite statements to the contrary from all involved and other commissions' results. Now the question is when will these senior officials be held accountable?

I'm hoping, but I'm not holding my breath.


GOP Will Lie 

That headline is not an exaggeration. It's been covered in several places, most especially by Josh Marshall, but it bears repeating. From the New York Times' Adam Nagourney:

Mr. Bush's advisers said they were girding for the most extensive street demonstrations at any political convention since the Democrats nominated Hubert H. Humphrey in Chicago in 1968. But in contrast to that convention, which was severely undermined by televised displays of street rioting, Republicans said they would seek to turn any disruptions to their advantage, by portraying protests by even independent activists as Democratic-sanctioned displays of disrespect for a sitting president.
Since it does bear repeating, let me pull out the lie - you have the context above, there is nothing tricky going on here...

...Republicans said they would seek to turn any disruptions to their advantage, by portraying protests by even independent activists as Democratic-sanctioned displays of disrespect for a sitting president.
Republicans have admitted it - by accident, I'm sure - they will lie to the American public about what happens at the RNC in New York. Regardless of who does what, the Republican smear machine will tell Americans that they are supported by and in league with the Democrats.

They will lie to you. They've admitted it.

Let that sink in for a minute.


I Want My TVM 

Just how ridiculous has our government's policies on Cuba become? Well... what's more ridiculous than ridiculous? Maybe this:

The Bush administration has successfully overcome Cuban jamming of U.S. government radio and television broadcasts through transmission from a military aircraft, the State Department said Monday.

Spokesman Adam Ereli said the transmissions of Miami-based Radio and TV Marti took place for several hours on Saturday from an aircraft flown by the Air National Guard.
Assuming that the Florida ANG used a specially modified C-130, the hourly cost of the operation was on the order of $50,000 (not unreasonable). And let's say that several hours means 6, just to make it a nice, round number. That would make 6 hours of radio and TV $300,000, not including the costs of producing the programming. If you throw in the support costs of aerial refueling the C-130, which means launching a KC-135 and couple of hours of flight time for that aircraft and crew, the cost could easily triple.

These crazy policies have continued years beyond any possibility that Cuba is a threat to the US, and yet we get statements like these:

"These broadcasts will give the Cuban people uncensored information about their country and the world, and will help bring about a rapid and peaceful transition to democracy," Mr. Ereli said.
Note the utter lack of irony in that statement...


A Stable and Democratic Iraq 

I'm pretty sure that this is not what C-Plus Augustus had in mind when he said - on so many occasions - that Iraq was moving toward stability and democracy.

Assailants on Tuesday targeted the convoys of the interim government's ministers of environment and education in two separate bombings in Baghdad, officials said.

Neither of the ministers was hurt, but at least five people were reported dead.

Meanwhile in Najaf, plumes of black smoke rose above the embattled city after American warplanes bombed insurgent positions overnight and supporters of a radical cleric charged that shrapnel from a U.S. attack had hit parts of the Imam Ali Shrine. The military denied the claim.
Neither is this, or this. Probably not this either.


Monday, August 23, 2004

Florida GOP 

If you had any doubts that recent incidents in Florida were purposeful attempts at suppressing the black vote, you can now put them to rest. In today's New York Times, Bob Herbert brings an interesting perspective to these activities which recently included the unprecedented act of having the Florida Highway Patrol "question" elderly, black get-out-the-vote volunteers about their activities.

So what's it really all about?

A Democrat can't win a statewide election in Florida without a high voter turnout - both at the polls and with absentee ballots - of African-Americans," said a man who is close to the Republican establishment in Florida but asked not to be identified. "It's no secret that the name of the game for Republicans is to restrain that turnout as much as possible. Black votes are Democratic votes, and there are a lot of them in Florida."
Read that again.

The next time that anyone from Florida's Republican party or from Jebbie's administration claims that these "interviews" are an innocent investigation or that the deeply and disturbingly flawed felon list was just a mistake, remember that quote, above. Then let them have it with both barrels.


BushCo. Jobs Program 

Today's Wall Street Journal reveals, for the first time, how the Bush administration plans to create more jobs in a second term. It seems that BushCo. plans to scrap old-fashioned jobs creation programs in manufacturing and the service sector. In fact, their job program is tightly integrated with their environmental programs.

Follow along with me to see what I mean. Here's how Bush plays it in his stump speeches:

On the campaign trail, Mr. Bush tends to play up the state jobs data when they are favorable. In Florida on Aug. 10, for example, he said that because of his tax cuts, "Florida has added nearly 300,000 jobs since the end of 2001."

But last Monday, in Michigan, which has lost 142,000 jobs since the end of 2001 (108,000 before Friday's data were available) and whose 6.8% unemployment rate is well above the national average, Mr. Bush only cited nationwide job data and acknowledged, "I fully understand we face challenges in some of our manufacturing communities. In some parts of Michigan, the recovery has lagged."
Pretty standard campaign fare, no doubt. But when economic analysts look at the numbers a somewhat different perspective emerges, and you can begin to see why Bush doesn't want to regulate greenhouse gas emitting industries too heavily:

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Economy.com, a West Chester, Pa., firm specializing in state and local economic analysis, said Florida's job market likely will continue to do well while Ohio's and Michigan's will remain weak between now and Election Day. Florida, he said, is about to receive a $20 billion influx of insurance money and state and federal disaster aid as a result of Hurricane Charley. Meanwhile, "Ohio and Michigan are very dependent on the domestic auto industry, which is struggling to hold onto sales and jobs."
See? All we need to add more jobs and boost the economy are a few more hurricanes. And what better way to stir up a little bad weather than to add lots of heat energy into the atmosphere? Add a little more carbon monoxide, a little more low-level ozone, pump up the particulate count. You can already imagine the glee in the White House if the National Weather Service had to extend the hurricane season by a month or two.

But we really shouldn't be too surprised at this; Republicans have been thriving on bad news and disaster for a long time.

Four more years? Hell no!


Stuff

Politics
Move On


Previous Posts

Google

Web The Fulcrum
Free Google Page Rank Checker

TTLB Ecosystem

Bloggers Parliament
Bloggers Parliament

Issues and Google Bombs
visit LIBERAL FORUM

Shopping

Directories

Site Stuff

Creative Commons License

The Fulcrum Archives

Refering Sites

Who Links to Me