Monday, January 16, 2006


What if Britain's intelligence agencies had discovered that one of the planners of the subway bombing had traveled from Britain to Canada to Manhattan? And what if they thought they knew exactly where he was going to be one Sunday evening? What if Britain decided to launch a submarine launched cruise missile to "take out" this terrorist and also took out an entire city block in the operation?

Just collateral damage in the war on terror, right?

Why would BushCo. think that such a blatant violation of an allies sovereignty as the recent strike against Ayman al-Zawahri would result in anything but what it has?

Why does it seem that everything he does in the prosecution of his so-called war on terror result in exactly the opposite of what a sane, rational person would want?

Why are there so many questions with no good answers?

No comments: