The Fulcrum
Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Bush is Outsourced! [UPDATED]
Via Hesiod from the Seattle Times, who seems to think Bush has finally stepped in it so badly that it's nearly unrecoverable for our Unelectable, Miserable Failure of a pRezint.
Seems that aWol, the compassionate conservative that he is believes that... well, check this out:
Shorter BushCo to American workers: "F*** you! I got mine!"
UPDATE: I thought that regular reader Bob James' comments to this post were relevant, so I'd like to share part of them. I hope he doesn't mind.
Seems that aWol, the compassionate conservative that he is believes that... well, check this out:
"The movement of American factory jobs and white-collar work to other countries is part of a positive transformation that will enrich the U.S. economy over time, even if it causes short-term pain and dislocation, the Bush administration said yesterday.This from a politician and an economist for whom there is no chance of their jobs being "outsourced." And in fact, probably true for both of them, these are people who have never had to work hard a day in their lives to get to where they are. Theirs have been lives of privilege, of leisure, of unearned success.
The embrace of foreign "outsourcing," an accelerating trend that has contributed to U.S. job losses in recent years and has become an issue in the 2004 elections, is contained in the president's annual report to Congress on the U.S. economy.
"Outsourcing is just a new way of doing international trade," said N. Gregory Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisors, which prepared the report. "More things are tradable than were tradable in the past. And that's a good thing."
Emphasis mine.
Shorter BushCo to American workers: "F*** you! I got mine!"
UPDATE: I thought that regular reader Bob James' comments to this post were relevant, so I'd like to share part of them. I hope he doesn't mind.
It is so far removed from the realities of the situation that it's hard to formulate a response. And I'm so sick of hearing about how it's going to cause "short-term pain". What the hell do those pukes know about short-term pain? I'm hearing from colleagues who routinely add up the pros and cons of eating a bullet because they're stuck packing boxes for $6.50/hr instead of the $55K/year job they once held, and kissed goodbye to India. No one who's suffering this fate sees the pain as short-term, nor even as trivial as "pain". "Soul-killing anguish" barely covers it.As I wrote above, these are people who don't know what it's like to live paycheck-to-paycheck; or at least what it means to have a budget that you have to stick to. Every problem they've had is trivial. Anyway, I thought Bob's remarks were important.
Monday, February 09, 2004
Media Decontaminated of Ricin
If you read my previous post about the discovery of ricin in a capitol mail room, you'll know that I had a strange feeling about the whole incident. Well recent news has done nothing to relieve that odd feeling.
The major news outlets have been all but silent on the story; the odd circumstances under which the powder was found, the strangely subdued reactions by BushCo and most of all the oddly ineffective manner in which the toxin was delivered: to the only medical doctor in Congress.
In an article in The Hill ("The newspaper for and about the US Congress), the Capitol Police spokeswoman said the following:
The major news outlets have been all but silent on the story; the odd circumstances under which the powder was found, the strangely subdued reactions by BushCo and most of all the oddly ineffective manner in which the toxin was delivered: to the only medical doctor in Congress.
In an article in The Hill ("The newspaper for and about the US Congress), the Capitol Police spokeswoman said the following:
Mail delivery to the Capitol complex is still suspended indefinitely, Capitol Police spokeswoman Contricia Sellers-Ford said yesterday.But more interesting than that, Capitol Police haven't even decided what they are going to do to start investigating this.
Although police have confiscated all unopened mail from congressional offices, Sellers-Ford said the department still hasn't "pinpointed” its testing procedures or decided if mail will be returned.That odd feeling in the back of my mind is not going away.
The police notice said that mail removed during cleanup was “wrapped in protective packaging, catalogued and sealed inside protective containers and will be cleaned,” adding that “every effort is being made to safely return mail.”
Sellers-Ford said “nothing has tested positive.”
New in the Blogroll
Mac-a-ro-nies. I've read her blog before, and have been remiss in not getting her onto my blogroll; don't you be remiss in not reading some of the best written commentary on a small blog. My only complaint is that she has no commenting system set up. (The fact that she uses a Mac also prejudices me towards her!)
I highly recommend this post on "gay marriage." This is time well spent.
I know I don't always post about adding people to my blogroll. If you read my blog and think you fit in with the other folks there, leave me a comment or an e-mail. I'll be glad to add you in. If you're a regular reader and commenter, and you're not there, I promise it's only because of an unintentional oversight. Let me know.
I highly recommend this post on "gay marriage." This is time well spent.
I know I don't always post about adding people to my blogroll. If you read my blog and think you fit in with the other folks there, leave me a comment or an e-mail. I'll be glad to add you in. If you're a regular reader and commenter, and you're not there, I promise it's only because of an unintentional oversight. Let me know.
Ipecac for the Mind
I didn't want, to; but I made myself. I read the entire transcript of Preznit aWol's interview on Meet the Press. While I was reading, I kept wanting to skim over just about everything Bush said. Reading his remarks is nearly as bad as listening to them. Has there ever been a more illiterate sounding president?
Lots of folks have done a great job dissecting this whole thing, especially I have to recommend the folks over at Corente, and NTodd over at Dohiyi Mir. But go visit most any of your favorite bloggers - there is plenty of really great reaction and analysis out there.
I just want to list a few of my reactions:
This is really starting to get me down.
Lots of folks have done a great job dissecting this whole thing, especially I have to recommend the folks over at Corente, and NTodd over at Dohiyi Mir. But go visit most any of your favorite bloggers - there is plenty of really great reaction and analysis out there.
I just want to list a few of my reactions:
1. I didn't bother to count, but there had to be a dozen references to 9/11 in various guises regardless of whether there was reason to link the topic being discussed with the terrorist attacks of 2001. This has been a staple in every public utterance by aWol.That's more than enough. I could go on, but, really, what's the point. The interview is done, there are some rumblings on the Right that this was a disaster for aWol, but the press has not really shown an interest in holding Shrubby to the same standards as they've held other presidents and the current crop of Democratic candidates. So what's the point?
2. I know I mentioned it in my remarks above, but reading his remarks is like reading the ramblings of a 10 year old. His noun-verb agreement problems make me cringe. His remarks bounce erratically from point to point and topic to topic all within what should be a short, easy answer.
3. Bush's verbal "placeholders" and acknowledgments of statements would have gotten me - and most likely him - slapped as a kid. They consisted of "Yeah" and "Uh-huh" and other figurative verbal tics that are impolite at best and uneducated at worst in "polite conversation." Coming from a supposedly well educated man occupying the most powerful seat in the world, they are atrocious. They are not the sign of a common man, aWol is anything but common in his patrician and very privileged rearing and education.
4. He outright lied in several places. This point is well covered in lots of analysis of the interview, and I won't lay out the specifics here, it's been done better on other blogs (see above).
This is really starting to get me down.
What I Didn't' Miss This Weekend
Another weekend is in the history books. Amazing how quickly they go by, isn't it?
It was a great weekend; some of which I blogged about: CATS downtown on Saturday and a wine tasting afternoon on Sunday. We didn't get any snow this weekend and we actually saw the sun both days - or at least that's what I think that bright ball in the sky was... it's been so long. I watched the Grammys last night. It was actually quite enjoyable, but then I'm a huge music fan and no matter how often I say that I'll just watch the red carpet show, I always get sucked in. And I always love it. Finally, a movie recommendation: for a night when you want a semi-light, funny, family kind of movie that's just odd enough to be different, I highly recommend "Secondhand Lions." Robert Duval, Michael Cain and Haley Joel Osment; all three are excellent. Rent it, you won't be disappointed.
So, I did miss a few things in the literal sense, but honestly, after paying such close attention to politics and news lately, I really didn't miss taking this past weekend completely off. I did read the papers, I can't help that - it's a very old habit. But I didn't watch aWol's interview, although I will read the transcripts today. I didn't watch any news shows, I did very little blog reading - sorry all of you.
Of course that's all to say that I have some catching up to do. I haven't done a Liberal Coalition blog about in a while, there are a couple of subjects I'd really like to write about and of course, there's this thing called "work."
So I guess I'd better get at it. It's a new week!
It was a great weekend; some of which I blogged about: CATS downtown on Saturday and a wine tasting afternoon on Sunday. We didn't get any snow this weekend and we actually saw the sun both days - or at least that's what I think that bright ball in the sky was... it's been so long. I watched the Grammys last night. It was actually quite enjoyable, but then I'm a huge music fan and no matter how often I say that I'll just watch the red carpet show, I always get sucked in. And I always love it. Finally, a movie recommendation: for a night when you want a semi-light, funny, family kind of movie that's just odd enough to be different, I highly recommend "Secondhand Lions." Robert Duval, Michael Cain and Haley Joel Osment; all three are excellent. Rent it, you won't be disappointed.
So, I did miss a few things in the literal sense, but honestly, after paying such close attention to politics and news lately, I really didn't miss taking this past weekend completely off. I did read the papers, I can't help that - it's a very old habit. But I didn't watch aWol's interview, although I will read the transcripts today. I didn't watch any news shows, I did very little blog reading - sorry all of you.
Of course that's all to say that I have some catching up to do. I haven't done a Liberal Coalition blog about in a while, there are a couple of subjects I'd really like to write about and of course, there's this thing called "work."
So I guess I'd better get at it. It's a new week!
Sunday, February 08, 2004
Languid Sunday
Sometimes, there's just nothing like a lazy Sunday to end the week - to end the weekend.
This morning we slept in a little late and didn't get out of bed until after 8:30. Then it was hot, light, homemade pancakes to start the day; lots of butter and real maple syrup. Well, real syrup for me, my wife doesn't like real maple so it's Mrs. Butterworth for her. Coffee, tea and, for me, a quick blog entry.
Then we're off to a nearby winery that's having a celebration of their ice wines. There will be sleigh rides through the vineyards, ice wine, chocolate, desserts of all kinds, live music and some friends. It should be a wonderful day. It could be warmer... right now it's only 21 degrees. But there's a light snow, a little sunshine and it should be absolutely beautiful. I think I'll be taking my camera - and if I get any good shots, I'll post a couple.
So, whatever it is that makes your Sunday relaxing and enjoyable and gets you recharged for another week, I hope you get it in spades today.
Sometimes, life is just perfect!
This morning we slept in a little late and didn't get out of bed until after 8:30. Then it was hot, light, homemade pancakes to start the day; lots of butter and real maple syrup. Well, real syrup for me, my wife doesn't like real maple so it's Mrs. Butterworth for her. Coffee, tea and, for me, a quick blog entry.
Then we're off to a nearby winery that's having a celebration of their ice wines. There will be sleigh rides through the vineyards, ice wine, chocolate, desserts of all kinds, live music and some friends. It should be a wonderful day. It could be warmer... right now it's only 21 degrees. But there's a light snow, a little sunshine and it should be absolutely beautiful. I think I'll be taking my camera - and if I get any good shots, I'll post a couple.
So, whatever it is that makes your Sunday relaxing and enjoyable and gets you recharged for another week, I hope you get it in spades today.
Sometimes, life is just perfect!
Saturday, February 07, 2004
If Only Canadians Could Vote
Those of you who've read this blog long enough know that my wife is Canadian. In general, I've found the Canadians I know to be very progressive folks; live and let live. While generally they like Americans - as people, it is seen as the kiss of death for any of their politicians to be seen as caving to a U.S. politician. Even our most liberal ones. And despite seeming to many of us here in the US as "the 51st State," you're likely to get a punch in the nose if you suggest any such thing to a Canadian. After which they would apologize profusely and buy you a beer (a good beer, not the pond water US breweries get away with selling). They are an unfailingly polite people.
Anyway...
It's no wonder that according to a MacLean's poll, only 15% of Canadians would vote for our stuffed flight suit pResident. If you've never read MacLean's, I highly recommend it. I would say it's close to Time Magazine, but better written, better edited and it will give you a very different point of view than the rest of our American, corporate, SCLM. There's a great article this month about how Canadians have a visceral dislike of aWol - and I recommend it - but the best part of this issue was the cover which I've lifted from the MacLean's site.
I think you'll appreciate this:

Anyway...
It's no wonder that according to a MacLean's poll, only 15% of Canadians would vote for our stuffed flight suit pResident. If you've never read MacLean's, I highly recommend it. I would say it's close to Time Magazine, but better written, better edited and it will give you a very different point of view than the rest of our American, corporate, SCLM. There's a great article this month about how Canadians have a visceral dislike of aWol - and I recommend it - but the best part of this issue was the cover which I've lifted from the MacLean's site.
I think you'll appreciate this:
Friday, February 06, 2004
Wishful Thinking Dog Blog
It's been a long, cold, snowy winter here in Western New York. And it's only February. Spring time seems a long time away. Before I moved up here, friends used to tell me that the weather here wasn't bad: "nine months of winter and three months of bad sledding." Oh well.
In light of the long winter, the long wait for spring and not having seen the grass here in months, I bring you this edition of Friday Dog Blogging here at The Fulcrum.

In light of the long winter, the long wait for spring and not having seen the grass here in months, I bring you this edition of Friday Dog Blogging here at The Fulcrum.
Google This!
Via Blah3 comes this latest Google Bomb. Not since Miserable Failure has there been a more apt attempt to game Google. Help point those looking for "Bush Military Record" in the right direction.
Go check it out!
It's in my right side bar, it's in this post: add it to your blog.
Go check it out!
It's in my right side bar, it's in this post: add it to your blog.
George W. Orwell
Paul Krugman hits one out of the park in today's New York Times opinion piece.
This is an important piece. Not because it says things that haven't been said, but because it says them so succinctly, so well and all in one place. This is something you could easily print out and wave in the face of the next freeper who drones on about one of these talking points.
One more reason this piece is important - a somewhat parochial reason: Krugman credits a blogger, Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo with reminding him of all these historical rewrites.
Lastly, Krugman closes his article sounding a lot like myself and other progressive/liberal bloggers:
Right now America is going through an Orwellian moment. On both the foreign policy and the fiscal fronts, the Bush administration is trying to rewrite history, to explain away its current embarrassments.Krugman reminds us of the real history of the intelligence problems prior to the Iraq war and of the seemingly never-ending budget deficits. He also shows how those following BushCo's talking points are sticking to their stories - no matter how poorly backed up by facts - and, unfortunately, how most of the media appears to be swallowing those points hook, line and sinker.
This is an important piece. Not because it says things that haven't been said, but because it says them so succinctly, so well and all in one place. This is something you could easily print out and wave in the face of the next freeper who drones on about one of these talking points.
One more reason this piece is important - a somewhat parochial reason: Krugman credits a blogger, Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo with reminding him of all these historical rewrites.
Lastly, Krugman closes his article sounding a lot like myself and other progressive/liberal bloggers:
I'd like to think that the administration's crass efforts to rewrite history will backfire, that the media and the informed public won't let officials get away with this. Have we finally had enough?
Thursday, February 05, 2004
Sometimes You Just Get it Right
It seems I may have been on the right track with my post from yesterday about Abdul Qadeer Khan. I predicted that nothing would happen to Khan, Musharraf or our relationship with Pakistan. From the article in today's NYT, I think this is shaping up just like I thought it would:
The president of Pakistan, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, granted a full pardon today to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the founder of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, who admitted sharing nuclear technology with other countries in a contrite television appearance on Wednesday night.And of course the crickets have been deafening as far as the White House goes on this. Yep, everything is just fine. Nothing to see here. Oh, look, ricin over in Congress!!
[snip]
Speaking to journalists after the news conference, General Musharraf said Dr. Khan would be under close supervision to prevent him from carrying out any more proliferation, but he added that there would be no further investigation.
The tone of his comments indicated that he wished to put the scandal behind him.
Emphasis is mine
Separate is Rarely, if Ever, Equal
The Massachusetts Supreme Court got it exactly right (WSJ) yesterday. And it was wonderful to hear - finally - a high court use the language of the civil rights movement in discussing this issue.
Whatever you call the legal union of two people, the rights of that couple should not be different based on; race, color, creed, national origin or sexual orientation. We've done the whole "separate but equal" thing before. You'd think we'd have learned our lesson.
Are equal rights for women "special rights?" Are equal rights for non-whites "special rights?"
Whatever you call the legal union of two people, the rights of that couple should not be different based on; race, color, creed, national origin or sexual orientation. We've done the whole "separate but equal" thing before. You'd think we'd have learned our lesson.
In Wednesday's opinion, the majority, led by Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, wrote that while the state couldn't force religions to perform or recognize gay marriages, "neither may the government, under the guise of protecting 'traditional' values, even if they be the traditional values of the majority, enshrine in law an invidious discrimination that our constitution... forbids."Whenever anyone finds themselves saying anything about "gay rights," they should instead, substitute - before opening their mouths - women or blacks or Hispanics in their statement. If that makes you hesitate to say it, then you shouldn't say it with the word gay or homosexual, either.
Are equal rights for women "special rights?" Are equal rights for non-whites "special rights?"
Bad Moon a' Ricin
Something about this whole ricin "attack" on Senator Frist's mailroom isn't adding up.
I'm not sure exactly what it is about the whole thing that seems like an itch in the back of my mind. And like everyone else, I'll just have to see how it all plays out. But something just isn't right.
There is no known antidote for the toxin, derived from castor beans in a relatively straightforward manner. It was initially thought that because the powder showed up in a mailroom that it had arrived, like anthrax before, in the mail. But postal inspectors are starting to doubt that (WSJ, subscription required).
Stories of an earlier letter with ricin in it from someone connected with the trucking industry now sound like a red herring; but from what are they distracting us? I'm treading dangerously close to tin foil hat territory here, so I'll go no further; I'm just raising some interesting points. We're not likely to hear anything remotely resembling the truth from BushCo., so watching the press and interpreting administration releases of information will have to suffice.
But something just doesn't add up in all of this.
I'm not sure exactly what it is about the whole thing that seems like an itch in the back of my mind. And like everyone else, I'll just have to see how it all plays out. But something just isn't right.
There is no known antidote for the toxin, derived from castor beans in a relatively straightforward manner. It was initially thought that because the powder showed up in a mailroom that it had arrived, like anthrax before, in the mail. But postal inspectors are starting to doubt that (WSJ, subscription required).
Investigators assume the poison, in the form of a white powder, was sent through the mail. But U.S. Postal Inspectors, who police the mail system, reported no success finding suspect packages after spending Wednesday combing Senate buildings and letter-sorting facilities trying to find a letter or a trail that would link the ricin to the mail system.So if it didn't arrive by mail how did it get there? Investigators can find no obvious trail. And the Department of Homeland Security has no plans to issue any alerts about ricin attacks.
"We normally would expect to find a bulging envelope with powder, but there isn't any yet and to be honest I am not optimistic we will find one," said Postal Inspector Daniel Mihalko.
Stories of an earlier letter with ricin in it from someone connected with the trucking industry now sound like a red herring; but from what are they distracting us? I'm treading dangerously close to tin foil hat territory here, so I'll go no further; I'm just raising some interesting points. We're not likely to hear anything remotely resembling the truth from BushCo., so watching the press and interpreting administration releases of information will have to suffice.
But something just doesn't add up in all of this.
Wednesday, February 04, 2004
Find the Real Boob
If you haven't read any of Spade's posts over at HAMMERDOWN, you should give him a visit. Especially funny is this post about "half-time-gate," the ensuing investigation and 9/11. Believe me, there's a connection there.
The Wrath of Khan
The man who created what is known in his country as the "Islamic Nuclear Bomb" has confessed to selling or giving away the secrets to recreating his work to some of the most wretched dictators in the world. Abdul Qadeer Khan, widely revered in Pakistan for building, likely from black market information, the first nuclear weapon in his country. This development "balanced" the development a couple years prior of a nuclear weapon in India.
In selling plans and knowledge of how to build a nuclear weapon - a true "weapon of mass destruction" - to Iran, Libya and North Korea, Abdul Khan is likely deserving of being sent before the Hague for crimes against humanity. And yet, because his country is, if not in deed then in word, an ally of BushCo's imperial adventures, you can be sure that the U.S. will officially accept his "apology" and require no more of Pakistan's Pervez Musharraf.
Khan made an abject apology on Pakistani TV saying that nobody in the government knew what was going on - over the course of two decades. On the face of it, this seems absolutely ludicrous. It is likely that nothing goes on in Pakistan without the military knowing about it. And Musharraf is the head of the military. The odds of him not knowing what his chief nuclear weapons scientist was doing are infinitesimal.
But aWol has looked Pervez Musharraf in the eyes and found him to be an honorable man and a worthy ally. Therefore, he is to be taken at his word. Nothing will happen to Khan. Nothing will happen to Musharraf. Nothing will happen to our relationship with Pakistan.
If the Democrats don't take this as another bludgeon in their attacks on Shrubby's international policies they are fools. They have an almost unlimited arsenal in such an attack. They should hammer him. Mercilessly.
John Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards, Wes Clark... we're waiting.
In selling plans and knowledge of how to build a nuclear weapon - a true "weapon of mass destruction" - to Iran, Libya and North Korea, Abdul Khan is likely deserving of being sent before the Hague for crimes against humanity. And yet, because his country is, if not in deed then in word, an ally of BushCo's imperial adventures, you can be sure that the U.S. will officially accept his "apology" and require no more of Pakistan's Pervez Musharraf.
Khan made an abject apology on Pakistani TV saying that nobody in the government knew what was going on - over the course of two decades. On the face of it, this seems absolutely ludicrous. It is likely that nothing goes on in Pakistan without the military knowing about it. And Musharraf is the head of the military. The odds of him not knowing what his chief nuclear weapons scientist was doing are infinitesimal.
But aWol has looked Pervez Musharraf in the eyes and found him to be an honorable man and a worthy ally. Therefore, he is to be taken at his word. Nothing will happen to Khan. Nothing will happen to Musharraf. Nothing will happen to our relationship with Pakistan.
If the Democrats don't take this as another bludgeon in their attacks on Shrubby's international policies they are fools. They have an almost unlimited arsenal in such an attack. They should hammer him. Mercilessly.
John Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards, Wes Clark... we're waiting.
Lord, I Was Born a Ramblin' Man...
I guess you could say I've been around. Most of my travels were with the Army, but a fair bit was done as a sales rep. as well.
Via BlogAmY:

Create your own visited states map
or write about it on the open travel guide.
Via BlogAmY:
Create your own visited states map
or write about it on the open travel guide.
I Was Starting to Feel Better
Thank you to everyone who sent me good wishes; I'm feeling much better today.
I would probably feeling a whole lot better had Dr. Dean done better last night, but since he did kind of blow off all seven states holding primaries and caucuses yesterday, I suppose it could have been worse. Kerry, besides winning big yesterday on a state count, also moved into first place in delegates; but there are plenty more to be won in the coming weeks. I do think, however, that Dean's showing yesterday does not position him well for the remaining 41 states to be won. Dr. Dean and Roy Neel have a lot of work before them.
There are two good pieces of news out of all of this: 1) The longer the fight for the democratic nomination goes on, the more press it gets, the more oxygen it steals from anything BushCo might have up their sleeves; 2) In three different polls, John Kerry is beating Shrubby head to head.
So, today it's back to work and hopefully back to a little blogging.
I would probably feeling a whole lot better had Dr. Dean done better last night, but since he did kind of blow off all seven states holding primaries and caucuses yesterday, I suppose it could have been worse. Kerry, besides winning big yesterday on a state count, also moved into first place in delegates; but there are plenty more to be won in the coming weeks. I do think, however, that Dean's showing yesterday does not position him well for the remaining 41 states to be won. Dr. Dean and Roy Neel have a lot of work before them.
There are two good pieces of news out of all of this: 1) The longer the fight for the democratic nomination goes on, the more press it gets, the more oxygen it steals from anything BushCo might have up their sleeves; 2) In three different polls, John Kerry is beating Shrubby head to head.
So, today it's back to work and hopefully back to a little blogging.
Tuesday, February 03, 2004
Bleh...
I've been fighting off some kind of bug the last couple of days and I'm still not feeling 100% so expect light blogging - at least for today.
Go check out everyone in the Liberal Coalition blogroll and my regular blogroll on the left. They are all good and they'll have plenty to say about the bombing in Irbil this weekend, the discovery of ricin in some congressional buildings, the seven primaries tonight and of course, the most important thing going on right now: Janet Jackson's breast.
I'll try to get something up today, but no promises.
Go check out everyone in the Liberal Coalition blogroll and my regular blogroll on the left. They are all good and they'll have plenty to say about the bombing in Irbil this weekend, the discovery of ricin in some congressional buildings, the seven primaries tonight and of course, the most important thing going on right now: Janet Jackson's breast.
I'll try to get something up today, but no promises.
Friday, January 30, 2004
Friday Dog Blog
If you've seen any national weather lately, you know that here in upstate New York we've gotten pounded lately with snow. A town I regularly drive through on the way to my in-laws got over 70 inches since Wednesday. We didn't get quite that much, but so far in January, we've gotten nearly 50 inches.
So for this Friday's edition of dog blogging on The Fulcrum here's yours truly and Baylea enjoying what we've got the most of... snow.

So for this Friday's edition of dog blogging on The Fulcrum here's yours truly and Baylea enjoying what we've got the most of... snow.
Dean's Dollar Doldrums?
There seems to be a mix of hope and despair among those supporting Dr. Dean for the Democratic nomination. Hope: that he will be able to continue to bring his message of change and to inspire the intense grass-roots devotion that has brought him this far. Despair: that he will have enough money to do so.
From the comments of an earlier post, Steven Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat had this to say:
Unfortunately, money plays such a huge part in just staying in the game, much less actually crossing the finish line. But that's the subject of an entirely different post.
I'm with Steve on this one; "I'm hoping for a miracle, and I'm with Dean to the end..."
From the comments of an earlier post, Steven Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat had this to say:
Sorry to spoil the fun, but if Dean is truly out of money, it may well be all over, whatever the delegate count.Yesterday I heard - and I can't remember where - that all of the people who had given to Dr. Dean couldn't afford "another $75." I think, no, I hope that particular talking head was underestimating the depth of support for Dean and the depth of their pockets. And there are likely still people out there who saw that Dean's fund raising was going so well that they didn't give the first time around.
Dean's money was, to all evidence, raised in a virtuous way, compared not only to other Dem candidates (though Kucinich also took the small-donations route) but to every candidate in recent prior presidential elections. But there's no getting around the fact that campaigns run on money. I'm hoping for a miracle, and I'm with Dean to the end (election or withdrawal), but I'm afraid it may take a miracle.
Unfortunately, money plays such a huge part in just staying in the game, much less actually crossing the finish line. But that's the subject of an entirely different post.
I'm with Steve on this one; "I'm hoping for a miracle, and I'm with Dean to the end..."
Thursday, January 29, 2004
Thanks for the Memories...
Via Rubber Hose, comes this video.
It is simple. It is powerful.
Whoever gets the Democratic nomination should purchase this video and run it as a commercial 24/7 for the duration of the campaign. Or maybe George Soros should do so.
Now there's an idea...
It is simple. It is powerful.
Whoever gets the Democratic nomination should purchase this video and run it as a commercial 24/7 for the duration of the campaign. Or maybe George Soros should do so.
Now there's an idea...
Trippi to Neel Before Dean
Joe Trippi's out in the Dean campaign. Roy Neel is in.
I heard this last night and haven't been able to figure out whether this is a good thing or not. Whether it's a smart move or a sign of desperation.
Neel was appointed to Al Gore's transition team when Gore was the presumptive - and actual - winner of the 2000 election and had pledged to join Dr. Dean's campaign after his ex-boss threw his support behind Dean.
Trippi did an excellent job propelling Dr. Dean to the forefront and to the front-runner position before the Iowa Caucuses. It remains to Roy Neel to bring him back to the front. He has his work cut out for him - I really hope he's up for the task.
By the way; still no mention in the press - anywhere - that Dean remains in the lead by delegate count.
I heard this last night and haven't been able to figure out whether this is a good thing or not. Whether it's a smart move or a sign of desperation.
Neel was appointed to Al Gore's transition team when Gore was the presumptive - and actual - winner of the 2000 election and had pledged to join Dr. Dean's campaign after his ex-boss threw his support behind Dean.
Trippi did an excellent job propelling Dr. Dean to the forefront and to the front-runner position before the Iowa Caucuses. It remains to Roy Neel to bring him back to the front. He has his work cut out for him - I really hope he's up for the task.
By the way; still no mention in the press - anywhere - that Dean remains in the lead by delegate count.
Shorter Condi: "Screw the American people."
There was part of an interview on Good Morning America today; Diane Sawyer was speaking with Condoleeza Rice about the David Kay testimony before Congress. She straight out asked Condi if Kay's assertions are found to be correct, would the President or someone in the administration admit to the people that they were wrong in asserting that Iraq had massive quantities of WMD that were a gathering/imminent threat to the US. Condi went off on the usual BushCo tangent about the world being a safer place without Saddam.
Much to my surprise - I almost choked on my breakfast - Diane actually followed up and repeated the question, almost forcefully. "Would the administration admit that it was wrong?"
No surprise that Condi evaded the question again. But it was very clear that the question had not been answered.
What was even more clear to me - and I hope it was as clear to everyone else watching - is that BushCo are not even trying to care what we might think about their misadventure in Iraq or the deceptions that lead up to it. They are playing their usual game of bluster and misdirection in the hope that the issue will fade away into the next crisis or the next Michael Jackson revelation. The difference this time is that a reporter actually called one of them on the misdirection.
A follow up question! What's next, some real reporting?
Much to my surprise - I almost choked on my breakfast - Diane actually followed up and repeated the question, almost forcefully. "Would the administration admit that it was wrong?"
No surprise that Condi evaded the question again. But it was very clear that the question had not been answered.
What was even more clear to me - and I hope it was as clear to everyone else watching - is that BushCo are not even trying to care what we might think about their misadventure in Iraq or the deceptions that lead up to it. They are playing their usual game of bluster and misdirection in the hope that the issue will fade away into the next crisis or the next Michael Jackson revelation. The difference this time is that a reporter actually called one of them on the misdirection.
A follow up question! What's next, some real reporting?
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
I'll See Your $477 Billion and Raise You $23 Billion!
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the 2004 budget deficit to be a record breaking $477 billion. Record breaking, budget breaking and back breaking for all those middle class people (like me!) who are forced to carry the tax burden and for our children and grandchildren whose economies will be burdened with paying off this debt.
Not wanting, apparently, to be outdone, the White House released its estimate: $500 billion - or more.
Here's an interesting take on it from the WSJ:
Not wanting, apparently, to be outdone, the White House released its estimate: $500 billion - or more.
Here's an interesting take on it from the WSJ:
The higher deficit estimate, to be reported in the president's 2005 budget request Monday, could give the White House political headaches in the short run, drawing further attention to the nose dive the government's finances have taken on President Bush's watch. But some analysts have suggested that the $500 billion estimate -- which White House officials have floated periodically since last summer -- could actually help Mr. Bush's cause if the fiscal year ends Sept. 30 with a deficit that is less than $500 billion. That could help Mr. Bush persuade voters that his policies have begun to turn around the deficit problem.Turning around the deficit problem. Right.
Playing With Air Safety
BushCo is continuing its policy of promise now to pay later - but only after we're safely gone. This time however it's not a Mars mission or AIDS assistance or even our children's' education. This time it's air safety. You know, one of those things that aWol specifically promised to fix even before September 11, 2001. From this morning's Wall Street Journal:
So, there's the cut, the part you knew was coming. Where's the promise?
There's the now-classic set up. We're going to do something so wonderful - just you wait and see! But it won't be finished for quite a while. Sure we'll be long gone, but you'll have a nice, shiny new [insert promise here]. Then, under the cover of the latest announcement or emergency, they cut funding for their brand new whatever. They've gotten quite good at it. But they've done it so often, you'd think the public would have caught on by now.
What? A new mission to Mars? Wow...
Now, what was I saying?
The Bush administration plans to propose a 16% cut in spending on air-traffic-control equipment and facilities, saving nearly half a billion dollars a year but postponing or scaling back projects aimed at making air travel more efficient.Don't be fooled by the word "efficient." When it comes to air traffic control, that means SAFETY. Efficiency in air traffic control means that planes don't have to be stacked up quite so closely when queued up for landing or takeoff. That gives controllers and pilots more time to react should something out of the ordinary happen.
So, there's the cut, the part you knew was coming. Where's the promise?
Speaking Tuesday to an aviation-industry group, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta made no mention of the budget plan but said the administration is working to triple the capacity of the nation's aviation system over the next 15 to 20 years.
There's the now-classic set up. We're going to do something so wonderful - just you wait and see! But it won't be finished for quite a while. Sure we'll be long gone, but you'll have a nice, shiny new [insert promise here]. Then, under the cover of the latest announcement or emergency, they cut funding for their brand new whatever. They've gotten quite good at it. But they've done it so often, you'd think the public would have caught on by now.
What? A new mission to Mars? Wow...
Now, what was I saying?
Tuesday, January 27, 2004
Hey, Big Spender...
"Tax and Spend." We all know that when someone uses that phrase, they are usually talking about Democrats.
Not any more. The chart below, comes from an article in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) and shows just why some "paleo-conservatives" are not too happy with BushCo. It also puts to rest that damned quote above - at least as far as it applies to Democrats.
Here's the arch-conservative WSJ on the matter of Shrubby's spending spree:
So, does all this mean that the so-called paleo-conservatives will vote for the Democratic nominee? Probably not. But it might mean that some of them will vote for somebody other than Shrubby; some independent. And that could be enough for the Democrat to clinch the election.
Not any more. The chart below, comes from an article in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) and shows just why some "paleo-conservatives" are not too happy with BushCo. It also puts to rest that damned quote above - at least as far as it applies to Democrats.
Here's the arch-conservative WSJ on the matter of Shrubby's spending spree:
But if the gap between revenues and outlays is of small concern in any single year -- and especially during recession and war -- it does not follow that there should be no worry over rapidly rising levels of federal spending. The much delayed omnibus appropriations bill for 2004, scheduled for a vote in the Senate this afternoon, looks set to cap the first term of the most profligate Administration since the 1960s.
[snip]
GOP leaders would have us believe this all adds up to one of the leanest spending plans in years -- an increase in federal discretionary spending of only 3%, compared with 13% and 12% in each of the previous two years. But Brian Riedl of the Heritage Foundation points out that it's really more like a 9% increase, and that's assuming there will be no supplemental appropriations as in previous years.
The 3% vs. 9% discrepancy results from the difference between budget authority and actual outlays. The increase in budget authority looks smaller only because a lot of money that will actually be spent in 2004 was assigned to 2003. That's true most importantly of the Iraq war supplemental. But the drive for the appearance of fiscal sanity has also reduced our representatives to gimmicks such as moving the authority for $2.2 billion in education spending back into 2003, after previously voting to push it forward to 2004. When corporations tried accounting like this, Congress gave us Sarbanes-Oxley.
[snip]
Amazing as it may sound, the ostensibly small-government GOP seems totally oblivious to the fact that all this spending puts its future economic agenda in jeopardy. Appropriations do mean taxes after all, even if they're deferred taxes.
All emphasis is mine.
So, does all this mean that the so-called paleo-conservatives will vote for the Democratic nominee? Probably not. But it might mean that some of them will vote for somebody other than Shrubby; some independent. And that could be enough for the Democrat to clinch the election.
Early Voting, Early Polling, Early Results
No, you won't find minute-by-minute updates on the New Hampshire primary here. But you will find this short rant about early exit poll results and early reporting.
I know that the networks have to fill up the morning news. I know that elections are now seen as part entertainment part spectacle. I also know that complaining about early reporting of results is a quadrennial sport - much like the Olympics.
But really.
The talking heads were all reporting exit poll results - and apparently real district results - after two small New Hampshire townships voted just after midnight. I won't repeat the results here; that shouldn't be done, in my opinion, until after all the results for the state are in. Honestly, can such reporting do anything but spoil the process? Anything that could potentially discourage voters from going to the polls is a bad thing. I think early reporting can do just that.
However, one thing you can count on from our friendly neighborhood media whores, is that they will bring you the circus for as long as they think you'll watch.
I know that the networks have to fill up the morning news. I know that elections are now seen as part entertainment part spectacle. I also know that complaining about early reporting of results is a quadrennial sport - much like the Olympics.
But really.
The talking heads were all reporting exit poll results - and apparently real district results - after two small New Hampshire townships voted just after midnight. I won't repeat the results here; that shouldn't be done, in my opinion, until after all the results for the state are in. Honestly, can such reporting do anything but spoil the process? Anything that could potentially discourage voters from going to the polls is a bad thing. I think early reporting can do just that.
However, one thing you can count on from our friendly neighborhood media whores, is that they will bring you the circus for as long as they think you'll watch.
Saturday, January 24, 2004
New Law Left Behind
Is there a GOP backlash against BushCo's No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law? According to the Washington Post, it seems there may be. And Democrats are gleefully piling on.
While this is just one part of BushCo's overall plan, it must be a sharp rebuke to what has seemed an unstoppable thrust to change so many aspects of our society. That even some of their staunchest supporters are starting to fight back gives some hope for November. At least it seems that way from the end of January.
The Republican-controlled Virginia House of Delegates sharply criticized President Bush's signature education program Friday, calling the No Child Left Behind Act an unfunded mandate that threatens to undermine the state's own efforts to improve students' performance.
[snip]
No Republicans voted against the resolution, a fact that House Education Committee Chairman James H. Dillard II (R-Fairfax) said is proof that "the damn law is ludicrous."
[snip]
As a result of a Republican legislative initiative in Ohio, the state commissioned a study released this month that found the federal government had significantly underfunded No Child Left Behind.
In North Dakota, a resolution sponsored by Democrats that stated the "cost to states of implementing the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is as yet unclear" was passed by both the Republican-controlled House and Senate. And the Republican legislature in Utah is considering legislation to forgo the federal money and opt out of the program entirely.
While this is just one part of BushCo's overall plan, it must be a sharp rebuke to what has seemed an unstoppable thrust to change so many aspects of our society. That even some of their staunchest supporters are starting to fight back gives some hope for November. At least it seems that way from the end of January.
Friday, January 23, 2004
Charles Duelfer
I'm not sure what the hell this means...
This after sending home the team that would have been responsible for handling any truly dangerous materials. The only thing this says to me is that BushCo has no idea what it's doing. But just about everything they do says that to me.
Any thoughts?
The CIA named a new inspector to lead the search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction Friday, choosing a veteran investigator who has expressed recent skepticism that Saddam Hussein possessed banned weapons that posed an immediate threat.From the Boston Globe on-line.
This after sending home the team that would have been responsible for handling any truly dangerous materials. The only thing this says to me is that BushCo has no idea what it's doing. But just about everything they do says that to me.
Any thoughts?
So Sad...
Bob Keeshan died today.
If you don't know that name, maybe you know this one: Captain Kangaroo.
What an amazingly sad piece of news. I haven't seen Capt. Kangaroo in probably 30 years, and yet as soon as I heard the news a flood of memories came back. Mr. Greenjeans, Bunny Rabbit, Mr. Moose, Grandfather Clock, Tom Terrific... Names that hadn't passed through my mind since I was eight or nine years old; but they were all there, like old friends.
Keeshan's show was a calm in a growing sea of chaos and violence aimed at young people. It is also one of my first memories of TV. Three generations of children grew up knowing the upbeat sound of his theme song. And now, he's gone. It may have been years - decades - since I'd seen him, but I will miss him.
If you don't know that name, maybe you know this one: Captain Kangaroo.
What an amazingly sad piece of news. I haven't seen Capt. Kangaroo in probably 30 years, and yet as soon as I heard the news a flood of memories came back. Mr. Greenjeans, Bunny Rabbit, Mr. Moose, Grandfather Clock, Tom Terrific... Names that hadn't passed through my mind since I was eight or nine years old; but they were all there, like old friends.
Keeshan's show was a calm in a growing sea of chaos and violence aimed at young people. It is also one of my first memories of TV. Three generations of children grew up knowing the upbeat sound of his theme song. And now, he's gone. It may have been years - decades - since I'd seen him, but I will miss him.
This is Justice?
Remember Congressman Bill Janklow from South Dakota? Sure you do; he ran a stop sign going 71 mph in a 55 mph zone, then hit and killed a young motorcylclist. No, wait... he was doing 71 mph in a 0 mph zone - he blasted right through that stop sign as apparently he had been seen doing before. He had dozens of speeding tickets that he got right up until he was elected for his third term when they suddenly stopped.
Rep. Janklow was tried and sentenced on December 8. According to the Wall Street Journal:
We are all equal in the eyes of the law; it's just that some of us are more equal than others.
Rep. Janklow was tried and sentenced on December 8. According to the Wall Street Journal:
Bill Janklow, who dominated South Dakota politics for three decades as governor and then congressman, was sentenced to 100 days in jail Thursday for an auto accident that killed a motorcyclist and ended Mr. Janklow's career in disgrace.I wonder how long you or I would have spent behind bars for that crime? You can be certain it would be a lot longer than 100 days with community service. But then - most likely - you and - for sure - me aren't rich, white, Republican males who likely appointed or had something to do with the appointment of the judge who would sentence us.
After 30 days behind bars, Mr. Janklow will be allowed to leave jail during the day for up to 10 hours to perform community service. After he completes his jail term, he will be on probation for three years, during which he won't be allowed to drive.
We are all equal in the eyes of the law; it's just that some of us are more equal than others.
Surprised? You Shouldn't Be.
Two Halliburton employees took kickbacks totaling up to $6 million for ensuring that a Kuwait based company was awarded a lucrative contract supplying US troops in Iraq. The Wall Street Journal reports that Halliburton reported the crime, perhaps softening the severity of potential penalties, but it brings even more scrutiny to the company. The company which was once headed by now-Vice President Dick Cheney - and which still provides him with "delayed compensation" - is already under intense scrutiny for charges that it overcharged the military for fuel deliveries by some $61 million.
Here's Tricky Dick on the subject:
Oh... Dr. Dean has it all.
For very good reason, I'd say.
Here's Tricky Dick on the subject:
Vice President Dick Cheney, who was chairman of Halliburton until he left in 2000, defended the company Wednesday in a Fox Radio Network interview. "They get unfairly maligned simply because of their past association with me," he said.And perhaps because they have gotten such a huge portion of the contracts for work in Iraq while you are the sitting VP? Here's how the WSJ put it:
KBR [Note: a subsidiary of Halliburton] is now repairing Iraqi oil fields and supplying everything from food and laundry services to housing for U.S. troops and coalition officials in Iraq under two huge contracts valued at up to $16 billion. That work has so far cost nearly $6 billion, well over twice what has gone to all of the other 40 U.S. contractors in Iraq, according to government records.How is it that this goes so relatively unnoticed? Why hasn't the Pentagon frozen all contract work by this group of thieves? Where is the outrage?
Oh... Dr. Dean has it all.
For very good reason, I'd say.
Early Friday Dog Blogging
The snow here has been incredible. So far in January, I think we've gotten over 50 inches. No kidding there are drifts in my back yard that are up to my hips. And it's been cold - just like the rest of the northeast - bitter cold with wind chills well below zero. But there's one thing that's constant (even when the temperatures are not): Dogs gotta play!
So, regardless of how the wind feels as though it could flay the skin off of our faces, we get bundled up and get Baylea out to play. And below she shows off at her favorite game: catching the ball in mid-air while executing the perfect half-reverse-flip.

So, regardless of how the wind feels as though it could flay the skin off of our faces, we get bundled up and get Baylea out to play. And below she shows off at her favorite game: catching the ball in mid-air while executing the perfect half-reverse-flip.
Thursday, January 22, 2004
Spirit, Phone Home...
Click the picture to go to the Mars Mission Site
Just when everything was going so well with NASA's latest mission.
They've lost contact with Spirit. More accurately, Spirit has stopped sending intelligible data. The radio is working, but it's no longer sending real data. In typically dry NASA-speak there is "a very serious anomaly on the vehicle."
I hope they re-establish contact. I hope the mission - and it's twin, set to land on Saturday - is a resounding success after this. But past Mars missions don't leave much hope for that.
Plame Leak Revisited
I had thought that the investigation into the leaking of CIA operative Valerie Plame was going to die a slow, silent death. But an article in today's New York Times states that a group of former intelligence officers is pressing the Justice Department to ensure the investigation does not come to a premature close.
This new wrinkle in the story gives me hope that someone will take the big perp-walk out of the White House. Wouldn't that be a nice "reverse October Surprise?"
It is unusual for former intelligence officers to petition Congress on a matter like this. The unmasking of Ms. Plame is viewed within spy circles as an unforgivable breach of secrecy that must be exhaustively investigated and prosecuted, current and former intelligence officials say. Anger over the matter is especially acute because of the suspicion, under investigation by the Justice Department, that the disclosure may have been made by someone in the White House to punish Ms. Plames's husband, former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, for opposing administration policy on Iraq.This investigation must get to the bottom of this leak. Putting American operatives into danger by revealing their identities to the press is treason, and must be punished accordingly. I believe that treason is currently a capital offense under federal laws. I'm not a fan of capital punishment, but I would like to see everyone involved in this put away for a long, long time.
This new wrinkle in the story gives me hope that someone will take the big perp-walk out of the White House. Wouldn't that be a nice "reverse October Surprise?"
Behind the State of the Union
Via Blah3, I found a great USA Today article. Like the editor at Blah3, I'm not at all a fan of this paper. I read it when I travel if it's the only thing available; and it's usually free at most hotels with lots of business travelers.
The article takes some key points from Shrubby's SOTU and then gives the reality, the context behind the points. There are no punches pulled, no candy coating.
Here's the opening salvo:
The article takes some key points from Shrubby's SOTU and then gives the reality, the context behind the points. There are no punches pulled, no candy coating.
Here's the opening salvo:
A reality check on what Bush said on key issues.I agree with Blah3's assessment: this is an example to place before your favorite SCLMW. Go check out both Blah3 and the article.
Weapons of mass destruction
What Bush said: Search teams have "identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities" in Iraq. "Had we failed to act, the dictator's weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day."
Context: The Bush administration has struggled to explain why weapons hunters have found no chemical or biological weapons in Iraq in 10 months of searching. On the eve of the war, President Bush said there was "no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised." He said terrorist groups could acquire weapons from Iraq and use them against the United States. A search effort led by CIA appointee David Kay has turned up no weapons and no evidence of any advanced weapons program, raising questions about the quality of U.S. intelligence and the Bush administration's justification for war in Iraq.
Wednesday, January 21, 2004
Blogabout
It's been a while - and it doesn't mean I haven't been reading the blogs. But here goes another Liberal Coalition Blogabout:
You just have to love a well written blog. All the wonderful content in the world won't make up for poor writing. But when there's content and writing, well that's something to get worked up about. Scout, over at And Then... has a great post about watching the SOTU with Wesley Clark. Go read about what Clark is like, how Scout feels about Clark. And for a little comic relief, read about his encounter with a couple of Larouche supporters.
Echidne of the Snakes takes a long hard look at anger. Anger in politics. Sure the Repugs are accusing Democrats of being angry, but who has practiced political hate speech for longer than those on the right. Sometimes anger is a good thing; it moves us to action - as long as it is well modulated and targeted. Go see what else Echidne has to say on anger.
At Collective Sigh, andante wonders how far Dr. Dean has to go to overcome his "angry" image, even with Democrats. Is it the media's fault? Deans? Or is something else at work here? Andante has some thoughts, but I won't ruin your trip over to read it yourself.
An annotated - with links, no less - State of the Union address awaits you at The Gotham City 13. It's only Part I, but Jesse has some interesting things to say (some snarky things, too!) and some interesting links in this dissection of aWol's SOTU. You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll shake your head more times than Ted Kennedy! Go check it out - and stand by for Part II.
You can always count on Mustang Bobby for some biting, South Florida perspectives, and a post on Jebby borrowing from Shrubby's play book is right on form. Tax cuts for the wealthy and cuts in services or continued waits for underfunded services seem to have been embedded in the Bush DNA at some point. There are lots of other great posts over at Bark Bark Woof Woof, stop by and make sure to let MB know you were there.
Finally, go read Steve Gilliard's News Blog. He's got a short post up about aWol's SOTU speech, and he's right on the money about how surreal Bush's choice of subjects were. But most of all, go welcome "Gilly" back from the hospital. He had a couple of rough days being pretty sick and it's nice to have him back.
Okay, that's enough for tonight. If you don't find something interesting in the posts I pointed to above (which is really hard to believe), check out some of the other blogs in my blogroll on the Left.
So ends another Liberal Coalition "Blogabout."
You just have to love a well written blog. All the wonderful content in the world won't make up for poor writing. But when there's content and writing, well that's something to get worked up about. Scout, over at And Then... has a great post about watching the SOTU with Wesley Clark. Go read about what Clark is like, how Scout feels about Clark. And for a little comic relief, read about his encounter with a couple of Larouche supporters.
Echidne of the Snakes takes a long hard look at anger. Anger in politics. Sure the Repugs are accusing Democrats of being angry, but who has practiced political hate speech for longer than those on the right. Sometimes anger is a good thing; it moves us to action - as long as it is well modulated and targeted. Go see what else Echidne has to say on anger.
At Collective Sigh, andante wonders how far Dr. Dean has to go to overcome his "angry" image, even with Democrats. Is it the media's fault? Deans? Or is something else at work here? Andante has some thoughts, but I won't ruin your trip over to read it yourself.
An annotated - with links, no less - State of the Union address awaits you at The Gotham City 13. It's only Part I, but Jesse has some interesting things to say (some snarky things, too!) and some interesting links in this dissection of aWol's SOTU. You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll shake your head more times than Ted Kennedy! Go check it out - and stand by for Part II.
You can always count on Mustang Bobby for some biting, South Florida perspectives, and a post on Jebby borrowing from Shrubby's play book is right on form. Tax cuts for the wealthy and cuts in services or continued waits for underfunded services seem to have been embedded in the Bush DNA at some point. There are lots of other great posts over at Bark Bark Woof Woof, stop by and make sure to let MB know you were there.
Finally, go read Steve Gilliard's News Blog. He's got a short post up about aWol's SOTU speech, and he's right on the money about how surreal Bush's choice of subjects were. But most of all, go welcome "Gilly" back from the hospital. He had a couple of rough days being pretty sick and it's nice to have him back.
Okay, that's enough for tonight. If you don't find something interesting in the posts I pointed to above (which is really hard to believe), check out some of the other blogs in my blogroll on the Left.
So ends another Liberal Coalition "Blogabout."
Iowa - And the Rest of the Campaign
I don't have much to say about the politics or results of the Iowa caucuses that hasn't already been said - and probably much better - by others. But something I did notice intrigued me. So I thought I'd wait a few days and see if I was just imagining it.
But no...
I noticed that all the talking heads on network and cable news, all the supposed pundits and reporters from the major papers, not one of them said anything more probing or insightful than I'd been reading in blogs for the months and weeks before the caucuses. If you tour most of the blogs in my blogroll of the Liberal Coalition or just about any of the "bigger" bloggers you'll find some incredibly cogent writing on the issues, on the candidates and on the outcomes. You'll also find just as many misses in calling the results. What you won't find in just about all of the blogs I read regularly and that I've grown to depend on as sounding boards and sources of analysis is the pack mentality of the SCLM. None of the blogs I truly like ever engaged in tearing down one Democratic candidate or another.
They were, in a word, more professional than the professionals.
That doesn't mean I'll be giving up the major news outlets, but it does say a lot about how far our media has fallen. And how far bloggers have risen.
But no...
I noticed that all the talking heads on network and cable news, all the supposed pundits and reporters from the major papers, not one of them said anything more probing or insightful than I'd been reading in blogs for the months and weeks before the caucuses. If you tour most of the blogs in my blogroll of the Liberal Coalition or just about any of the "bigger" bloggers you'll find some incredibly cogent writing on the issues, on the candidates and on the outcomes. You'll also find just as many misses in calling the results. What you won't find in just about all of the blogs I read regularly and that I've grown to depend on as sounding boards and sources of analysis is the pack mentality of the SCLM. None of the blogs I truly like ever engaged in tearing down one Democratic candidate or another.
They were, in a word, more professional than the professionals.
That doesn't mean I'll be giving up the major news outlets, but it does say a lot about how far our media has fallen. And how far bloggers have risen.
Tuesday, January 20, 2004
State of the Union
I'm tired and I'm going to bed. But here's my quick, over-tired take on Shrubby's SOTU:
Over promise.I really hate that smirk.
Under fund.
Appeal to the base(r) desires.
Let the shit hit the fan long after he's gone.
Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Gephardt
Totally unexpected.
Lots of real work today, so I won't get to this 'till much later.
Hmmmmm...
Lots of real work today, so I won't get to this 'till much later.
Hmmmmm...
Monday, January 19, 2004
More High-Tech Offshoring
Today's Wall Street Journal has an article on Big Blue, IBM, and offshoring. While the article does give numbers; 3,000 jobs will be moved to China, Brazil and India, it also deals with some internal documents that give a glimpse into how the company is trying to position these moves.
So what could convince IBM that decreasing the number of people in this country with jobs or who have a good opinion of IBM is a good thing? The article lays out some very interesting numbers:
In a final bit of ignominy and vast understatement, IBM's managers are given a script for how to handle these firings.
The IBM documents show that the company is acutely aware of the sensitivities involved. One memo, which advises managers how to communicate the news to affected employees, says among other things: "Do not be transparent regarding the purpose/intent" and cautions that the "Terms 'On-shore' and 'Off-shore' should never be used." The memo also suggests that anything written to employees should first be "sanitized" by human-resources and communications staffers.Notice the phrases above I've bolded: if you clear away the business speak what it says is that employees being fired because their jobs are being moved offshore should suffer one additional indignity: they should be lied to. "Do not be transparent," don't, for heaven's sake tell them why they are really being fired. "Sanitized," don't give them any clue why we are screwing them over and especially don't give them any legal recourse.
So what could convince IBM that decreasing the number of people in this country with jobs or who have a good opinion of IBM is a good thing? The article lays out some very interesting numbers:
Besides the low-level programmers billing at $12.50 an hour, the chart shows that a Chinese senior analyst or application-development manager with more than five years experience would be billed at $18 an hour. The person familiar with IBM's operations said that person would be equivalent to a U.S. "Band 7" employee billed at about $66 an hour. And a Chinese project manager with seven years experience would be billed at $24 an hour, equivalent to a U.S. "Band 8" billed at about $81 hourly.Those are very interesting numbers and even if they somewhat overstate the actual savings most companies see by offshoring they are hard to ignore. And yet they understate what would be lost besides American jobs. They completely ignore the way that companies are continuing to "recover" from the recession at the expense of their employees. Employees - or ex-employees - who will no longer be able to buy IBM products. Ex-employees who will be forced into lower paying jobs, forced to shop at Wal-Mart. All of which forces the economy into a jobless spiral and continues to push average wages lower and lower.
In a final bit of ignominy and vast understatement, IBM's managers are given a script for how to handle these firings.
In the draft script prepared for managers, IBM suggests the workers be told: "This action is a statement about the rate and pace of change in this demanding industry. ... It is in no way a comment on the excellent work you have done over the years." The script also suggests saying: "For the people whose jobs are affected by this consolidation, I understand this is difficult news."
Patriots vs Carolina
It's time for an annual tradition of mine and this is the first year I'll do it in so public a manner. Every year around this time I have to explain just why it is I don't care a bit about the "Super Bowl."
It's not just the Super Bowl. I don't watch any sports on TV. I don't follow any team in any way. There are no stats from some long forgotten game clogging my memory, no player's record stuck to some neuron in the back of my head. It's not that I never played sports; I've played, at some point in my life: football, baseball, lacrosse, soccer, volleyball, racquetball, tennis, handball, golf - and I'm sure I've forgotten some. I also run and downhill ski.
Here's how I look at it: If I have three or four hours to waste in front of the television, that's time I could be doing so many other things, including actually being active. I've always felt that way. I'd much rather be doing something rather than watching somebody else doing something.
So there'll be no Super Bowl parties at my house. If I get invited to one - and actually go - it'll be for the commercials and the half-time show (and maybe the beer). The only reason I know who's playing this year is that you can't get away from it; it's blared from every TV channel and radio station. Don't ask me who I'm rooting for; I don't know anything about the teams or the players.
I know. It makes me an odd sort of creature: an American male who doesn't watch sports. It really does take all kinds.
It's not just the Super Bowl. I don't watch any sports on TV. I don't follow any team in any way. There are no stats from some long forgotten game clogging my memory, no player's record stuck to some neuron in the back of my head. It's not that I never played sports; I've played, at some point in my life: football, baseball, lacrosse, soccer, volleyball, racquetball, tennis, handball, golf - and I'm sure I've forgotten some. I also run and downhill ski.
Here's how I look at it: If I have three or four hours to waste in front of the television, that's time I could be doing so many other things, including actually being active. I've always felt that way. I'd much rather be doing something rather than watching somebody else doing something.
So there'll be no Super Bowl parties at my house. If I get invited to one - and actually go - it'll be for the commercials and the half-time show (and maybe the beer). The only reason I know who's playing this year is that you can't get away from it; it's blared from every TV channel and radio station. Don't ask me who I'm rooting for; I don't know anything about the teams or the players.
I know. It makes me an odd sort of creature: an American male who doesn't watch sports. It really does take all kinds.
Saturday, January 17, 2004
Trading Votes for Science
It seems it's as simple as that. Shrubby's grandstanding, election year announcement that NASA will focus its energies (and hence its monies) on returning men to the moon and eventually to Mars is the death knell for one of the most important and fruitful missions ever undertaken. Because of aWol's announcement requires that all future shuttle missions be dedicated to completing ISS, NASA has canceled all future servicing missions to the Hubble Space Telescope.
Hubble has provided incredible and unprecedented views of the distant universe; into the past; closer to the "Beginning" than we had ever seen. It gave us beautiful pictures, definitely. But it also gave us insights into the most fundamental questions that a sentient race could ask: "where did we come from? what came before?"
But NASA had to cancel the last servicing mission that would have provided Hubble with updated gyroscopes, batteries and perhaps, in a future mission updated sensors. The final mission to Hubble will now be a small rocket to ensure that Hubble de-orbits in a safe manner. The budget for that mission, likely around 2007 - to kill Hubble - must come, in a final irony, from NASA's astronomy budget.
Go here to see some of the incredible images brought to mankind by Hubble.
Hubble has provided incredible and unprecedented views of the distant universe; into the past; closer to the "Beginning" than we had ever seen. It gave us beautiful pictures, definitely. But it also gave us insights into the most fundamental questions that a sentient race could ask: "where did we come from? what came before?"
But NASA had to cancel the last servicing mission that would have provided Hubble with updated gyroscopes, batteries and perhaps, in a future mission updated sensors. The final mission to Hubble will now be a small rocket to ensure that Hubble de-orbits in a safe manner. The budget for that mission, likely around 2007 - to kill Hubble - must come, in a final irony, from NASA's astronomy budget.
As the news flashed around the world by e-mail, other astronomers joined the Hubble team in their shock. Dr. David N. Spergel, an astronomer at Princeton and a member of a committee that advises NASA on space science, called it a "double whammy" for astronomy. Not only was a telescope being lost, but $200 million worth of instruments that had been built to be added in the later shuttle mission will also be left on the ground, Dr. Spergel said.If I thought that this program would actually result in the establishment of a permanent base on the moon and the landing of astronauts on Mars, I might not despair for Hubble. But for a publicity stunt, one which he has already underfunded even in its announcement, aWol has ensured the destruction of one of the finest scientific instruments ever devised by man.
Go here to see some of the incredible images brought to mankind by Hubble.
Friday, January 16, 2004
Don't Adjust Your Set
It's not your computer, it's not the strange weather, it's not the couple of frosty beverages of choice you just had. No, it's not even the CIA or the NSA or the Secret Service. It's just me rearranging my blog template.
My side bar was getting too long, I thought. So I split it up into right and left and put my posts in the middle. I'm pretty sure I like it; it keeps the place neat, clean and with a certain visual appeal, I think.
Let me know what you think.
My side bar was getting too long, I thought. So I split it up into right and left and put my posts in the middle. I'm pretty sure I like it; it keeps the place neat, clean and with a certain visual appeal, I think.
Let me know what you think.
Friday Dog Blogging - Late Edition
If you've been watching the news or the weather, you know that where I live - near Rochester, NY - it's been very snowy and cold. So this edition of Friday Dog Blogging; featuring Baylea the Wonder Lab shows Baylea in our back yard, her face covered in snow after snuffling through about 12 inches of snow looking for her favorite ball.
We were freezing, bundled up in snow pants, parkas and hats. Baylea wanted to stay out all afternoon. We compromised: Baylea played, we froze.

We were freezing, bundled up in snow pants, parkas and hats. Baylea wanted to stay out all afternoon. We compromised: Baylea played, we froze.
Why I Read Bob Herbert
And why you should too:
Herbert wrote today about Al Gore's environment speech in NYC; about his passion, about his grasp of not only BushCo's rape of the environment in the name of donor quid pro quo, but of the larger danger of Shrubby's cabal. Read the entire article here, but these two paragraphs are just so outstanding that I had to include them in this post:
Herbert wrote today about Al Gore's environment speech in NYC; about his passion, about his grasp of not only BushCo's rape of the environment in the name of donor quid pro quo, but of the larger danger of Shrubby's cabal. Read the entire article here, but these two paragraphs are just so outstanding that I had to include them in this post:
The fates dealt Mr. Gore and the United States a weird hand in 2000. He got the most votes but the other guy became president. And the country, its Treasury looted and its most pressing needs deliberately ignored, has been rolling backward ever since.
"This is insanity," said Mr. Gore, referring to the administration's handling of the environment. But his speech made it clear that he could just as easily have applied that sentiment to the full range of Bush-Cheney policies. History will not be kind to the chicanery that passes for governing in the Bush II administration.
Thursday, January 15, 2004
Upyernoz vs Safire
Head over to Rubber Hose and see Upyernoz dissect William Safire's latest lame effort at spinning BushCo's misadventures in the world as successful.
The post is long, well written and worth every minute it takes to read it. Join the commenters in asking him to send this missive into the New York Times to add a little balance.
The post is long, well written and worth every minute it takes to read it. Join the commenters in asking him to send this missive into the New York Times to add a little balance.
France vs USA
I thought I'd just keep with the World Cup feel to my headlines today.
Lots of folks have blogged about France wanting to indict VP Dick "The Puppetmaster" Cheney for his role as then-CEO of Halliburton when that company was bidding, with a French oil company for gas rights in Nigeria. There is the possibility of a sitting Vice President being indicted by a foreign country for bribery and corrupt practices while a CEO for a company from which he is still receiving delayed compensation. If indicted, he would obviously not stand trial, but then would be unable to travel to any country within the EU without being arrested and brought to trial. That would make him really useful, right?
This is huge news, right?
Nothing in the Wall Street Journal.
Nothing in the New York Times.
Washington Post? Nope.
Where can you find the story?
The UN Observer.
Le Figaro (France's largest, conservative paper), of course (archived stories must be paid for, but watch the front page for upcoming stories).
Al Jazeera.
And an article - not on the front page - from January 9th in the Dallas Morning News.
Our wonderful, So-Called Liberal Media, doing it's job. Which is, apparently, nothing.
Lots of folks have blogged about France wanting to indict VP Dick "The Puppetmaster" Cheney for his role as then-CEO of Halliburton when that company was bidding, with a French oil company for gas rights in Nigeria. There is the possibility of a sitting Vice President being indicted by a foreign country for bribery and corrupt practices while a CEO for a company from which he is still receiving delayed compensation. If indicted, he would obviously not stand trial, but then would be unable to travel to any country within the EU without being arrested and brought to trial. That would make him really useful, right?
This is huge news, right?
Nothing in the Wall Street Journal.
Nothing in the New York Times.
Washington Post? Nope.
Where can you find the story?
The UN Observer.
Le Figaro (France's largest, conservative paper), of course (archived stories must be paid for, but watch the front page for upcoming stories).
Al Jazeera.
And an article - not on the front page - from January 9th in the Dallas Morning News.
Our wonderful, So-Called Liberal Media, doing it's job. Which is, apparently, nothing.
Brazil vs USA
I'm not talking about the next World Cup match up. No, unfortunately I'm referring to the latest incident caused by Brazil's requirement that Americans visiting that country to be finger printed and photographed. That move comes in retaliation for BushCo's new requirement for visitors from a long list of countries, including Brazil, to be photographed and finger printed on entry to the U.S. Several countries have complained about the intrusive process, but Brazil has been most vocal and was the first to take a counter action.
Here's the entire AP article, reprinted from this morning's Wall Street Journal:
Here's the entire AP article, reprinted from this morning's Wall Street Journal:
Brazil's New Entry Rules
Cause Yet Another Flap
Associated Press
SAO PAULO, Brazil -- An American Airlines pilot was arrested by federal police after making an obscene gesture when being photographed at the airport as part of a newly imposed entry requirement for U.S. citizens, federal police said.
The pilot allegedly lifted his middle finger while undergoing a new fingerprinting and photographing process put in place by Brazil for U.S. citizens Jan. 1, said Francisco Baltazar da Silva, chief of Sao Paulo's federal police. The pilot has agreed to pay a fine equal to $12,750, a federal prosecutor said.
The incident is the latest flap in a growing diplomatic spat between Brazil and the U.S. Brazil began requiring Americans to be photographed and fingerprinted upon entering Brazil in response to a U.S. antiterrorism measure that requires the same from citizens of all countries who need visas to enter the U.S. The Brazilian requirement became the government's official policy Monday, citing the diplomatic concept of "reciprocity."
American Airlines spokeswoman Martha Pantin said the incident was the result of a misunderstanding under investigation by the airline, but didn't provide more details. American Airlines is owned by holding company AMR Corp.
What's New In My Sidebar?
For being so opinionated on so many other things, you've probably wondered why I haven't come out and said who I support for President this year. The wondering can stop (if any of you were...).
I have decided - at the same time as Carol Moseley Braun, apparently - to support Governor Howard Dean, M.D..
For long-time readers, you'll remember that I initially expressed interest in Gen. Clark. But after watching all the candidates over these past months, reading their positions and mulling everything over, I've made my decision. I think that Dr. Dean can defeat the unelectable fraud currently in residence in our White House. I think he's got the right policy ideas and I think that he can lead us back to a true leadership position in the world.
I have added my voice to the growing chorus for Dr. Dean. If you haven't figured out who you're going to vote for, I hope that you are actively trying to come to decision. You may make no more important decision for yourself or your children this year.
I have decided - at the same time as Carol Moseley Braun, apparently - to support Governor Howard Dean, M.D..
For long-time readers, you'll remember that I initially expressed interest in Gen. Clark. But after watching all the candidates over these past months, reading their positions and mulling everything over, I've made my decision. I think that Dr. Dean can defeat the unelectable fraud currently in residence in our White House. I think he's got the right policy ideas and I think that he can lead us back to a true leadership position in the world.
I have added my voice to the growing chorus for Dr. Dean. If you haven't figured out who you're going to vote for, I hope that you are actively trying to come to decision. You may make no more important decision for yourself or your children this year.
Wednesday, January 14, 2004
A Friend in Need...
Everyone go visit Elayne Riggs today over at Pen-Elayne. She's feeling a bit down on herself and could use some encouragement, kind words and some general support and good will.
Off with you. Go be nice to your neighbor!
Off with you. Go be nice to your neighbor!
Rumsfeldian
Another word from this administration to describe a type of lying. Maybe this one should be limited to mean only hagiographic, sycophantic lying. Here, let me show you what I mean.
This is Rumsfeld, on Shrubby, in the New York Times, refuting Paul O'Niell's assertion that aWol was like "a blind man in a room full of deaf people."
This is Rumsfeld, on Shrubby, in the New York Times, refuting Paul O'Niell's assertion that aWol was like "a blind man in a room full of deaf people."
Mr. Rumsfeld defended the president for "his brain, his engagement, his interest, his probing questions, his constructive and positive approach to issues."Describes Bush perfectly, no?
Bush Election Boondoggles Part I
The biggest election year boondoggle is already getting plenty of press; both mainstream and in the blogosphere. I want to talk about another, much smaller boondoggle.
In this environment of ever expanding federal deficits as far as the eye can see, when state and federal programs to help the truly needy are being cut everywhere, BushCo, in a nod to their fundamentalist, right-wing, wacko base are willing to blow $1.5 billion on promoting marriage.
There is some evidence that education programs that promote good communication on important marital matters really do help couples remain married. There is less evidence, but still some, that such programs aimed at people before they marry are helpful as well. All well and good. However, you just know that nothing this administration does can be for the good it can do or because sound science says it's the right thing to do. What sort of restrictions can you imagine would be in such a program that would increase it's appeal to the rabid, bible-thumpers on the right?
Well, there's the much hated 1996 "Defense of Marriage Act," which specifies that for any federal program a married couple must only be defined as... go ahead, you know the answer... a man and a woman.
There are other problems of course. Many groups worry that such programs would be de facto coercion to marry or that there would be pressure for women to remain in abusive marriages.
Beyond that, I'm concerned that such programs would provide ammunition for local and state judiciaries to roll back the gains made in divorce law over the past several decades. They could be induced to add restrictions to divorce statutes and knowing the propensity of conservatives to define everything in terms of how it can benefit males (and especially WASP males), you could expect such restrictions to fall most heavily on women.
In combination with the DMA, such programs are sure to be heralded as a move back to the "good old days" when heterosexual marriage for life was not only expected, but tacitly enforced by societal convention and by the law regardless of the toll it takes on women and children.
"Compassionate Conservatives." Makes your head hurt doesn't it?
I think the word you're looking for is "oxymoron."
In this environment of ever expanding federal deficits as far as the eye can see, when state and federal programs to help the truly needy are being cut everywhere, BushCo, in a nod to their fundamentalist, right-wing, wacko base are willing to blow $1.5 billion on promoting marriage.
There is some evidence that education programs that promote good communication on important marital matters really do help couples remain married. There is less evidence, but still some, that such programs aimed at people before they marry are helpful as well. All well and good. However, you just know that nothing this administration does can be for the good it can do or because sound science says it's the right thing to do. What sort of restrictions can you imagine would be in such a program that would increase it's appeal to the rabid, bible-thumpers on the right?
Well, there's the much hated 1996 "Defense of Marriage Act," which specifies that for any federal program a married couple must only be defined as... go ahead, you know the answer... a man and a woman.
There are other problems of course. Many groups worry that such programs would be de facto coercion to marry or that there would be pressure for women to remain in abusive marriages.
Beyond that, I'm concerned that such programs would provide ammunition for local and state judiciaries to roll back the gains made in divorce law over the past several decades. They could be induced to add restrictions to divorce statutes and knowing the propensity of conservatives to define everything in terms of how it can benefit males (and especially WASP males), you could expect such restrictions to fall most heavily on women.
In combination with the DMA, such programs are sure to be heralded as a move back to the "good old days" when heterosexual marriage for life was not only expected, but tacitly enforced by societal convention and by the law regardless of the toll it takes on women and children.
"Compassionate Conservatives." Makes your head hurt doesn't it?
I think the word you're looking for is "oxymoron."
Tuesday, January 13, 2004
A Good Night
I don't do many posts on personal subjects, but tonight was such a nice night I just thought I'd share a little of it with you.
After a long day of work (the only "not great" part of the day), my wife and I came home - we work at the same office - made a nice, quick dinner, then had a great big piece of carrot cake. Now carrot cake happens to be my favorite dessert in the whole world. I usually only get it one day of the year; my birthday. So, as you might guess, today's my birthday (I'm not telling!).
It's cold, windy, snowy and just generally miserable outside. But inside it's warm and cozy; there's an open bottle of wine and a fire. It just doesn't get any better than that.
Now, if you're wondering what the hell I'm doing blogging with all of that outside of my den: my wife's on the phone to her parents. So I thought I'd just send out a sort of reverse birthday greeting to you all. I've had a great time writing this blog. But of course without readers - especially those who leave comments - it would just be typing practice. So thank you all very much. Your comments and your blogs have been a help and an inspiration to me.
So, with all I have here at home and with all of you out there, I feel it's been a very good year. And I'm ready to start another.
After a long day of work (the only "not great" part of the day), my wife and I came home - we work at the same office - made a nice, quick dinner, then had a great big piece of carrot cake. Now carrot cake happens to be my favorite dessert in the whole world. I usually only get it one day of the year; my birthday. So, as you might guess, today's my birthday (I'm not telling!).
It's cold, windy, snowy and just generally miserable outside. But inside it's warm and cozy; there's an open bottle of wine and a fire. It just doesn't get any better than that.
Now, if you're wondering what the hell I'm doing blogging with all of that outside of my den: my wife's on the phone to her parents. So I thought I'd just send out a sort of reverse birthday greeting to you all. I've had a great time writing this blog. But of course without readers - especially those who leave comments - it would just be typing practice. So thank you all very much. Your comments and your blogs have been a help and an inspiration to me.
So, with all I have here at home and with all of you out there, I feel it's been a very good year. And I'm ready to start another.
Hubris Defined
It's been widely commented on but, not surprisingly, underreported in the media, but I just had to say something on it.
Has there ever been a president - not including Reagan, I mean that's not fair, the guy had Alzheimers - who is so out of touch with reality? That just had to be an unscripted moment; did Rove turn away for an instant?
He's not only unelectable, he's impeachable!
"No President has ever done more for human rights than I have."I wanted yesterday to go into the whole "who said this" routine, but it's been done. I wanted to write about the sheer gall of aWol, but that's been way over done. I wanted to bang my head on my desk, but I've been doing that so much lately that I have a permanent bruise on my forehead.
Has there ever been a president - not including Reagan, I mean that's not fair, the guy had Alzheimers - who is so out of touch with reality? That just had to be an unscripted moment; did Rove turn away for an instant?
He's not only unelectable, he's impeachable!
Comments
Those of you who use BlogSpeak already know, but for those who don't and are looking for my comments link... Well, here's the message up on the BlogSpeak web site as of this morning:
Damn.
UPDATE: I've set up HaloScan for my comments. I'm not sure how long BlogSpeak will be down... I hope I don't lose all the comments I'd gathered over the past months. Anyway... comment away!
BlogSpeak is currently down because the bastards that host it decided to suspend my account. I do not know as of yet when this situation will be resolved. If you don't want any JavaScript errors on your pages, take the code off for the time being. Thanks for your patience.I'm off to find a (temporary, I hope) replacement. I hope BlogSpeak comes back up. I really like the service; it works.
Damn.
UPDATE: I've set up HaloScan for my comments. I'm not sure how long BlogSpeak will be down... I hope I don't lose all the comments I'd gathered over the past months. Anyway... comment away!
Monday, January 12, 2004
Army War College Critical of War on Terror
In a further shot at aWol's "War on Terra'," the Army War College authorized the publication of a paper exceptionally critical on the current direction of the War on Terror.
It'll come as no surprise to those in the center or left side of the blogosphere, but:
This has not been a good day for the administration with the major war-fighting colleges of their own military. This is important stuff. Read the rest of this article in the Washington Post on-line here. Read the whole report at the Strategic Studies Institute, here.
UPDATE:A paragraph from the SSI report that is the perfect description of why aWol's Global War on Terror (GWOT) seems oddly detached from any discernable or achievable goal:
It'll come as no surprise to those in the center or left side of the blogosphere, but:
The report, by Jeffrey Record, a visiting professor at the Air War College at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama, warns that as a result of those mistakes, the Army is "near the breaking point."Record goes on to say that the Iraq misadventure was a dangerous distraction from the more important focus on al Qaeda.
It recommends, among other things, scaling back the scope of the "global war on terrorism" and instead focusing on the narrower threat posed by the al Qaeda terrorist network.
This has not been a good day for the administration with the major war-fighting colleges of their own military. This is important stuff. Read the rest of this article in the Washington Post on-line here. Read the whole report at the Strategic Studies Institute, here.
UPDATE:A paragraph from the SSI report that is the perfect description of why aWol's Global War on Terror (GWOT) seems oddly detached from any discernable or achievable goal:
“Terrorism” as a word and concept became associated in US
and Israeli discourse with anti-state forms of violence that were
so criminal that any method of enforcement and retaliation
was viewed as acceptable, and not subject to criticism. By so
appropriating the meaning of this infl ammatory term in such a
self-serving manner, terrorism became detached from its primary
historical association dating back to the French Revolution. In
that formative setting, the state’s own political violence against
its citizens, violence calculated to induce widespread fear and
achieve political goals, was labeled as terrorism.
Bold emphasis mine. Charles2
Comments Down
Blogspeak, the great folks who provide my comment system, are having problems today. Their website says that they hope to have the system up and operating by this evening.
If there's anything you want to let me know, or if you just have comments, send me an e-mail - see the link below. Thanks for your patience.
If there's anything you want to let me know, or if you just have comments, send me an e-mail - see the link below. Thanks for your patience.
U.S. Joins USSR, East Germany, China and North Korea
The Supreme Court today allowed the administration to withhold the names and whereabouts of hundreds of people seized in the United States by the government in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.Those other countries in my headline also allowed - or do allow - the secret arrest of citizens or residents without judicial review. Is this what BushCo's War on Terra' has brought us to? Are these the countries with whom we want the world and historians of the future to associate us?
That this vital, constitutionally important case was decided in such an egregious manner should be an affront to all citizens.
I am not - to head off the trolls - saying that the information being sought on detainees should be released without review, but such broad-based denial of rights and the lack of transparency of government actions are monstrous.
"It's the first time in history that the government has arrested people in secret," said Kate Martin, who represented the Center for National Security studies in challenging the government. "We had hoped that the court would look at the unprecedented and serious first amendment issues here . . . We have 200 years of law and tradition saying that arrests are public . . . We do not have secret arrests."Apparently we do have secret arrests now.
Congratulations to al Qaeda; you've moved our government another step closer to an oligarchic theocracy; another step closer to destroying our way of life.
NOTE: all quotes above from this article in the Washington Post on-line.
Diplomatic Might
This was an interesting letter - from an interesting source (note the signature block at the bottom). This is, perhaps a sign that the military, here in the form of a professor from the Naval War College, has had enough of the neocon acid trip of world domination through preemptive warfare.
The original was in today's on-line Wall Street Journal, here (subscription required), but I hope Prof. Stigler doesn't mind me reproducing the entire thing here:
The original was in today's on-line Wall Street Journal, here (subscription required), but I hope Prof. Stigler doesn't mind me reproducing the entire thing here:
America Still Needs Striped-Pants Brigade
It is ironic that David Frum and Richard Perle ("Beware the Soft-Line Ideologues," editorial page, Jan. 7) dismiss diplomacy while using an example that clearly indicates the risks of an assertive foreign policy. They express concern over the future of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf. Yet the assassination attempts on Mr. Musharraf must be partly caused by frustration over assertive American actions abroad and Islamabad's reluctant support of those actions.
And condemning diplomacy because it has not solved an incredibly complicated problem such as the Israeli/Palestinian dispute is ridiculous. Their shallow perspective is akin to dismissing the utility of military force following our defeat in Vietnam.
My students at the Naval War College are chiefly military officers, many of whom served in Afghanistan and Iraq. They are not "soft-line ideologues." Yet it has constantly surprised me how many of them believe that diplomacy will be a crucial weapon in the struggle against terror. Given that military force alone will never defeat the diverse forces that generate terrorism, we must avoid the narrow and dangerous perspective that Messrs. Frum and Perle offer.
Andrew L. Stigler
Associate Professor
National Security Affairs
United States Naval War College
Newport, R.I.
Anger Management
I know that several other bloggers have already written about Dr. Dean's "anger problem." But after a piece on this mornings ABC news, I just had to add my two cents worth.
ABC showed a couple of video clips with Dr. Dean "getting angry." Now, I'm normally pretty mild mannered - but I do have a temper. I know people who have hair-trigger tempers and I know people who have volcanic tempers. Dr. Dean has none of these things. He appears to get angry on occasion, he yells a bit - although none of the clips I've ever seen of him show him truly losing his temper.
So I find it odd that people say he has an anger problem.
I find Dr. Dean's anger to be refreshing. He gets upset at things that should make him upset - they make me upset. He has real reactions to real problems and situations. He's not mealy mouthed about things, he doesn't try to talk his way around things so that whatever comes out of his mouth seems tepid and somehow out of touch with the reality of things.
In other words, he reacts - he gets angry - like a real person; not like a politician.
Since I last wrote about a politician - Gen. Clark, about 3 months ago - I've done lots of thinking, but have restrained myself from coming out and really endorsing any Democrat. I did however register at the end of last year as a Democrat so I could vote in the New York primaries. Some people might be somewhat turned off by Dr. Dean's so-called "anger problem." I think his reactions are real; I think they are appropriate for where we find our country right now.
I think I'm beginning to see my candidate.
ABC showed a couple of video clips with Dr. Dean "getting angry." Now, I'm normally pretty mild mannered - but I do have a temper. I know people who have hair-trigger tempers and I know people who have volcanic tempers. Dr. Dean has none of these things. He appears to get angry on occasion, he yells a bit - although none of the clips I've ever seen of him show him truly losing his temper.
So I find it odd that people say he has an anger problem.
I find Dr. Dean's anger to be refreshing. He gets upset at things that should make him upset - they make me upset. He has real reactions to real problems and situations. He's not mealy mouthed about things, he doesn't try to talk his way around things so that whatever comes out of his mouth seems tepid and somehow out of touch with the reality of things.
In other words, he reacts - he gets angry - like a real person; not like a politician.
Since I last wrote about a politician - Gen. Clark, about 3 months ago - I've done lots of thinking, but have restrained myself from coming out and really endorsing any Democrat. I did however register at the end of last year as a Democrat so I could vote in the New York primaries. Some people might be somewhat turned off by Dr. Dean's so-called "anger problem." I think his reactions are real; I think they are appropriate for where we find our country right now.
I think I'm beginning to see my candidate.
Sunday, January 11, 2004
When You Think Your Life Sucks...
I don't know how many people saw the report several months ago about the teenage surfer who was attacked by a shark and lost her arm. She seemed like a very strong young woman, but I really did wonder how she could recover from such an injury and return to her sport. For those of you who've surfed, you know it's a sport that requires incredible balance and quick movements.
I'm not really one of those people who like stories where there's some kind of moral about how strong the human spirit is - not usually anyway, but the picture that accompanied her story on CCN.com today really amazed me.
So, here's that AP picture; I hope it amazes you, too.

I'm not really one of those people who like stories where there's some kind of moral about how strong the human spirit is - not usually anyway, but the picture that accompanied her story on CCN.com today really amazed me.
So, here's that AP picture; I hope it amazes you, too.












